Author Affiliations
Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650000, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Comparison of dark pixel sparseness between blurred image and clear image. (a) Clear image; (b) blurred image; (c) dark channel image of Fig.1(a); (d) dark channel image of Fig.1(b)
Fig. 2. Target image estimation process
Fig. 3. Flowchart of PSF estimation algorithm
Fig. 4. Flowchart of MCBD algorithm
Fig. 5. “church” blurred images and restoration results. (a1)--(a3) Blurred images; (b) algorithm in Ref.[23]; (c) algorithm in Ref.[6]; (d) proposed algorithm
Fig. 6. “clock” blurred images and restoration results. (a1)--(a3) Blurred images; (b) algorithm in Ref.[23]; (c) algorithm in Ref.[6]; (d) proposed algorithm
Fig. 7. “architectural” blurred images and restoration results. (a1)--(a3) Blurred images; (b) algorithm in Ref.[23]; (c) algorithm in Ref.[6]; (d) proposed algorithm
Fig. 8. “bridge” blurred images and restoration results. (a1)--(a3) Blurred images; (b) algorithm in Ref.[23]; (c) algorithm in Ref.[6]; (d) proposed algorithm
Fig. 9. Real blurred images and restoration results. (a1)--(a3) Blurred images; (b) algorithm in Ref.[23]; (c) algorithm in Ref.[6]; (d) proposed algorithm
Fig. 10. Real blurred images and restoration results. (a1)--(a3) Blurred images; (b) algorithm in Ref.[23]; (c) algorithm in Ref.[6]; (d) proposed algorithm
Picture | Algorithm in Ref.[23] | Algorithm in Ref.[6] | Proposed algorithm |
---|
SSIM | PSNR /dB | SSIM | PSNR /dB | SSIM | PSNR /dB |
---|
“church” | 0.7492 | 26.3744 | 0.6284 | 24.4055 | 0.6988 | 25.6721 | “clock” | 0.6286 | 20.8001 | 0.5535 | 20.1290 | 0.6517 | 22.0581 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of evaluation indexes of restored images
Picture | Algorithm in Ref.[23] | Algorithm in Ref.[6] | Proposed algorithm |
---|
SSIM | PSNR /dB | SSIM | PSNR /dB | SSIM | PSNR /dB |
---|
“architectural” | 0.6158 | 25.6843 | 0.5592 | 25.1919 | 0.5706 | 31.0540 | “bridge” | 0.7718 | 27.8574 | 0.6073 | 28.1760 | 0.6090 | 28.3548 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of evaluation indexes of restored images