• Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves
  • Vol. 42, Issue 2, 250 (2023)
Guang-Hui HE1、2, Hong WANG1、2、*, Qiang FANG1、2, Yong-An ZHANG1、2, Dan-Lu ZHAO1、2, and Ya-Ping ZHANG1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Science, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
  • 2Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Modern Information Optics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2023.02.016 Cite this Article
    Guang-Hui HE, Hong WANG, Qiang FANG, Yong-An ZHANG, Dan-Lu ZHAO, Ya-Ping ZHANG. Spaceborne photon counting lidar point cloud denoising method with the adaptive mountain slope[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2023, 42(2): 250 Copy Citation Text show less
    Point cloud coarse denoising results
    Fig. 1. Point cloud coarse denoising results
    Point cloud fine removal noise process
    Fig. 2. Point cloud fine removal noise process
    Schematic diagram of slope angle calculation of point cloud data and data segmentation processing diagram,(a) the angle of the elliptical domain under different slope angles, (b) slope angle calculation, (c) data segmentation, (d) consolidation of data segments
    Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of slope angle calculation of point cloud data and data segmentation processing diagram,(a) the angle of the elliptical domain under different slope angles, (b) slope angle calculation, (c) data segmentation, (d) consolidation of data segments
    The density cluster threshold is determined
    Fig. 4. The density cluster threshold is determined
    Specific clustering removal noise process
    Fig. 5. Specific clustering removal noise process
    Point cloud data fine removal noise
    Fig. 6. Point cloud data fine removal noise
    ICESat-2 satellite transit area in the Area of Yellowstone National Park and Great Smoky Mountains Forest Park in the United States
    Fig. 7. ICESat-2 satellite transit area in the Area of Yellowstone National Park and Great Smoky Mountains Forest Park in the United States
    The spaceborne photon counting lidar matches the NEON data
    Fig. 8. The spaceborne photon counting lidar matches the NEON data
    ATLAS data matches onboard data
    Fig. 9. ATLAS data matches onboard data
    Denoising results of different denoising algorithms: (a) (d) (g) (j) the result of the algorithm of this paper processing Data1-4, (b) (e) (h) (k) the result of the LOF algorithm processing Data1-4, (c) (f) (i) (l) the result of the DBSCAN algorithm processing Data1-4
    Fig. 10. Denoising results of different denoising algorithms: (a) (d) (g) (j) the result of the algorithm of this paper processing Data1-4, (b) (e) (h) (k) the result of the LOF algorithm processing Data1-4, (c) (f) (i) (l) the result of the DBSCAN algorithm processing Data1-4
    Comparison of ground curves for different data
    Fig. 11. Comparison of ground curves for different data
    Comparison of crown curves in different data
    Fig. 12. Comparison of crown curves in different data
    The algorithm in this paper is compared with ATL08 data,(a)、(c)、(e)、(g) the results of processing and classifying Data1-4 for the algorithm herein, (b)、(d)、(f)、(h) the ATL08 data corresponding to Data1-4
    Fig. 13. The algorithm in this paper is compared with ATL08 data,(a)、(c)、(e)、(g) the results of processing and classifying Data1-4 for the algorithm herein, (b)、(d)、(f)、(h) the ATL08 data corresponding to Data1-4
    本文算法LOF算法DBSCAN算法
    PRFPRFPRF
    Data10.8780.9910.9310.66710.80.7990.9990.888
    Data20.8910.9990.9420.84810.9180.87710.934
    Data30.8510.9990.9190.84510.9160.860.9520.904
    Data40.7060.9660.8160.4290.950.5910.6380.9740.771
    Table 1. Comparison of different algorithms
    坡度角自适应的椭圆域聚类算法椭圆域聚类算法
    PRFT(s)PRFT(s)
    Data10.8780.9910.9312.5310.81710.89916.766
    Data20.8910.9990.9424.7810.8730.9990.932115.234
    Data30.8510.9990.9193.4530.84610.91752.578
    Data40.7060.9660.8164.1880.6850.980.80666.297
    Table 2. Comparison of the efficiency of elliptic area clustering algorithms and slope adaptive elliptic area clustering algorithms
    本文算法ATL08数据
    RMSE(m)R2Bias(m)RMSE(m)R2Bias(m)
    Data1地面0.358 80.999 7-0.019 90.732 30.998 70.207 5
    冠层3.744 90.968 6-1.688 717.7610.276 1-16.850 4
    Data2地面0.9180.999-0.035 21.3120.9980.079 7
    冠层4.349 10.977 7-2.593 67.259 60.936 4-5.033
    Data3地面1.732 30.993-0.365 12.833 10.976 20.912 4
    冠层4.397 40.95-0.868 65.110 40.94-0.161 4
    Data4地面2.177 50.999 4-0.568 712.121 90.980 27.887 9
    冠层5.967 80.994 7-2.415 29.627 40.9860.355 5
    Table 3. In this paper, the algorithmic processing results are compared with the ATL08 data
    Guang-Hui HE, Hong WANG, Qiang FANG, Yong-An ZHANG, Dan-Lu ZHAO, Ya-Ping ZHANG. Spaceborne photon counting lidar point cloud denoising method with the adaptive mountain slope[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2023, 42(2): 250
    Download Citation