• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 6, 0615003 (2018)
Yan Liu1、2, Qingwu Li1、2、*, Guanying Huo1、2, and Jun Xing1
Author Affiliations
  • 1 College of Internet of Things Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213022, China
  • 2 Changzhou Key Laboratory of Sensor Networks and Environmental Sensing, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213022, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.0615003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yan Liu, Qingwu Li, Guanying Huo, Jun Xing. Local Binary Description Combined with Superpixel Segmentation Refinement for Stereo Matching[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(6): 0615003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Disparity images of Cones. (a) Left view of Cones; (b) true disparity image; (c) initial disparity image; (d) mismatching test result
    Fig. 1. Disparity images of Cones. (a) Left view of Cones; (b) true disparity image; (c) initial disparity image; (d) mismatching test result
    Segmentation results for various numbers of superpixel. (a) M=800; (b) M=1600; (c) M=2400; (d) M=3200
    Fig. 2. Segmentation results for various numbers of superpixel. (a) M=800; (b) M=1600; (c) M=2400; (d) M=3200
    Comparison of initial disparity results. (a) Reference image; (b) Cencus method; (c) GD-Cencus method; (d) proposed method
    Fig. 3. Comparison of initial disparity results. (a) Reference image; (b) Cencus method; (c) GD-Cencus method; (d) proposed method
    Effect of numbers of superpixel on the (a) speed and (b) quality
    Fig. 4. Effect of numbers of superpixel on the (a) speed and (b) quality
    Mismatching test result for Cones after disparity refinement. (a) MST method; (b) WCPSP method; (c) DR method; (d) proposed method
    Fig. 5. Mismatching test result for Cones after disparity refinement. (a) MST method; (b) WCPSP method; (c) DR method; (d) proposed method
    Disparity images of non-overlapping region between reference image and match image. (a) Ground truth disparity image; (b) initial disparity image; disparity images using (c) MST method, (d) WCPSP method, (e) DR method and (f) proposed method
    Fig. 6. Disparity images of non-overlapping region between reference image and match image. (a) Ground truth disparity image; (b) initial disparity image; disparity images using (c) MST method, (d) WCPSP method, (e) DR method and (f) proposed method
    Refinement results for Tsukuba, Venus, Teddy, and Cones. (a) Ground truth disparity; (b) MST method; (b) WCPSP method; (c) DR method; (d) proposed method
    Fig. 7. Refinement results for Tsukuba, Venus, Teddy, and Cones. (a) Ground truth disparity; (b) MST method; (b) WCPSP method; (c) DR method; (d) proposed method
    Comparisons of error rates using WCPSP, BSM, ARW, and proposed method. (a) Percentage of bad pixel for non-occluded; (b) percentage of bad pixel for all
    Fig. 8. Comparisons of error rates using WCPSP, BSM, ARW, and proposed method. (a) Percentage of bad pixel for non-occluded; (b) percentage of bad pixel for all
    ItemTsukubaVenusTeddyCones
    Image resolution /(pixel×pixel)384×288434×383450×375450×375
    Disparity search range /pixel0-150-190-590-59
    MST /s1.2012.2151.1231.232
    WCPSP /s1.5132.3552.0122.356
    DR /s1.5291.3882.8552.620
    Proposed method /s0.2020.2960.4050.445
    Table 1. Running time of four methods
    ItemTsukubaVenusTeddyCones
    EnonoccEallEdiscEnonoccEallEdiscEnonoccEallEdiscEnonoccEallEdisc
    NonPost11.249.0618.404.015.6119.909.9920.8123.794.4715.6414.19
    MST11.5913.1119.224.055.6620.1810.7119.9125.285.3915.9214.84
    WCPSP3.014.0012.290.861.549.293.749.6911.163.9911.1811.80
    DR5.175.6112.861.031.697.836.4814.2016.563.468.909.99
    Proposed method4.394.669.770.811.275.246.9411.7717.502.867.978.09
    Table 2. Comparison of error rate of optimization algorithm%
    Yan Liu, Qingwu Li, Guanying Huo, Jun Xing. Local Binary Description Combined with Superpixel Segmentation Refinement for Stereo Matching[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(6): 0615003
    Download Citation