• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 14, 141016 (2020)
Jun Ouyang*, Qingwei Shi, Xinxin Wang, and Liang Wang
Author Affiliations
  • College of Software, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, Liaoning 125105, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.141016 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jun Ouyang, Qingwei Shi, Xinxin Wang, Liang Wang. Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction Based on GAN and Attention Mechanism[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(14): 141016 Copy Citation Text show less
    Overall architecture of GI-GAN model
    Fig. 1. Overall architecture of GI-GAN model
    Comparison of model training loss. (a) Generated loss; (b) discriminant loss; (c) position offset loss
    Fig. 2. Comparison of model training loss. (a) Generated loss; (b) discriminant loss; (c) position offset loss
    ADE results of models under different K values. (a) S-GAN predicting loss; (b) GI-GAN-NA predicting loss; (c) GI-GAN predicting loss
    Fig. 3. ADE results of models under different K values. (a) S-GAN predicting loss; (b) GI-GAN-NA predicting loss; (c) GI-GAN predicting loss
    Comparison of prediction trajectories of different models. (a)-(g) Correct graphs of GI-GAN model trajectory prediction; (h)(i) error graphs of GI-GAN model trajectory prediction
    Fig. 4. Comparison of prediction trajectories of different models. (a)-(g) Correct graphs of GI-GAN model trajectory prediction; (h)(i) error graphs of GI-GAN model trajectory prediction
    Multiple reasonable trajectories of GI-GAN-NA model
    Fig. 5. Multiple reasonable trajectories of GI-GAN-NA model
    Multiple reasonable trajectories of GI-GAN model
    Fig. 6. Multiple reasonable trajectories of GI-GAN model
    Multiple reasonably predicted trajectories of same scene. (a) Maintain the original speed and turn to the horizontal direction; (b) slow down and wait, then turn to horizontal direction; (c) direct turn to the left and accelerate
    Fig. 7. Multiple reasonably predicted trajectories of same scene. (a) Maintain the original speed and turn to the horizontal direction; (b) slow down and wait, then turn to horizontal direction; (c) direct turn to the left and accelerate
    K-valueADE
    S-GANGI-GAN-NAGI-GAN
    10.4760.4830.488
    200.3390.3310.310
    250.3310.3220.298
    500.3120.2970.280
    Table 1. Comparison of ADE results of three models under different K values
    ModelLinearLSTMS-LSTMS-GANS-GAN-PGI-GAN-NAGI-GAN
    ETH0.840.710.730.600.650.570.41
    Hotel0.350.550.480.310.370.330.39
    ADE /mUniv0.560.360.420.350.400.320.31
    Zara 10.410.250.270.220.230.230.25
    Zara 20.540.310.330.200.210.190.21
    AVG0.540.440.450.340.370.330.31
    ETH1.591.461.481.131.231.120.73
    Hotel0.601.171.010.570.890.590.64
    FDE /mUniv1.010.770.840.710.790.720.69
    Zara 10.730.540.550.420.430.430.46
    Zara 20.950.650.740.430.440.400.45
    AVG0.980.920.920.650.760.650.59
    Table 2. Comparison of ADE and FDE results of different models
    Jun Ouyang, Qingwei Shi, Xinxin Wang, Liang Wang. Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction Based on GAN and Attention Mechanism[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(14): 141016
    Download Citation