Author Affiliations
1Institute of Modern Optics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China2Tianjin Key Laboratory of Micro-Scale Optical Information Science and Technology, Tianjin 300350, China3Tianjin Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Sensor and Sensing Network Technology, Tianjin 300350, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Structural diagram of metagrating. (a) Structure and function; (b) structural parameters
Fig. 2. Flow chart of grating optimization based on deep learning neural network
Fig. 3. Schematic of neural network training process
Fig. 4. [in Chinese]
Fig. 4. Parameter optimization process. (a) Relationship between A and Lloss when ep=1000 and ba=2500; (b) relationship between ep and Lloss when A=300 and ba=2500
Fig. 5. Predicted diffraction spectra and actual diffraction spectra of metagratings under different conditions. (a) W1=2.23 mm, W2=1.61 mm, H1=5.21 mm, H2=0.64 mm, Hsub=1.82 mm;(b) W1=1.94 mm, W2=1.70 mm, H1=2.09 mm, H2=1.20 mm, Hsub=3.07 mm;(c) W1=1.51 mm, W2=0.80 mm, H1=
Fig. 6. Diffraction spectrum of optimal metagrating screened based on neural network
Fig. 7. Diffraction characteristics of gratings. (a) Relationship between frequency and diffraction angle; (b) relationship between diffraction angle and diffraction efficiency
Fig. 8. Near-field distributions of metagrating at different frequencies. (a) 139.7 GHz; (b) 169.3 GHz
Incident lightfrequency /GHz | Diffractionangle /(°) | Intensity |
---|
139.7 | 51.16 | 0.93 | 145.2 | 55.28 | 1.00 | 151.9 | 60.22 | 0.96 | 160.6 | 65.22 | 0.78 | 169.3 | 70.20 | 0.65 |
|
Table 1. Far field diffraction angle and intensity distributions