• Acta Physica Sinica
  • Vol. 69, Issue 9, 090303-1 (2020)
Sheng Yu1, Huan-Zhang Liu1, Sheng-Shuai Liu1、*, and Jie-Tai Jing1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • 2Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.7498/aps.69.20200040 Cite this Article
    Sheng Yu, Huan-Zhang Liu, Sheng-Shuai Liu, Jie-Tai Jing. Generation of quadripartite entanglement based on four-wave mixing process and linear beam splitter[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(9): 090303-1 Copy Citation Text show less
    A simplified diagram of quadripartite entanglement and an energy level diagram of rubidium-85: (a) C0 and C2 are vacuum states, Pr0 and Pr2 are coherent states; C1 and are the twin beams generated by the first four-wave mixing process, C3 and are the twin beams generated by the second four-wave mixing process; Pr1 and Pr3 are produced by mixing beams and through a linear beam splitter; (b) the double Λ energy level structure of D1 line in rubidium-85, Δ and δ represent one-photon detuning and two-photon detuning respectively.
    Fig. 1. A simplified diagram of quadripartite entanglement and an energy level diagram of rubidium-85: (a) C0 and C2 are vacuum states, Pr0 and Pr2 are coherent states; C1 and are the twin beams generated by the first four-wave mixing process, C3 and are the twin beams generated by the second four-wave mixing process; Pr1 and Pr3 are produced by mixing beams and through a linear beam splitter; (b) the double Λ energy level structure of D1 line in rubidium-85, Δ and δ represent one-photon detuning and two-photon detuning respectively.
    The smallest symplectic eigenvalue v of all 1 × 3 scenarios, as a function of the power gains G1 and G2: (a) C1 is partially transposed; (b) Pr1 is partially transposed; (c) Pr3 is partially transposed; (d) C3 is partially transposed.
    Fig. 2. The smallest symplectic eigenvalue v of all 1 × 3 scenarios, as a function of the power gains G1 and G2: (a) C1 is partially transposed; (b) Pr1 is partially transposed; (c) Pr3 is partially transposed; (d) C3 is partially transposed.
    The smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of all 2 × 2 scenarios, as a function of the power gains G1 and G2: (a) C1 and Pr1 arepartially transposed; (b) C1 and Pr3 are partially transposed; (c) C1 and C3 are partially transposed.
    Fig. 3. The smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of all 2 × 2 scenarios, as a function of the power gains G1 and G2: (a) C1 and Pr1 arepartially transposed; (b) C1 and Pr3 are partially transposed; (c) C1 and C3 are partially transposed.
    Effect of the transmissivity of the linear beam splitter on the quadripartite entanglement of the system: (a) C1 is partially transposed; (b) Pr1 is partially transposed; (c) Pr3 is partially transposed; (d) C3 is partially transposed; (e) C1 and Pr1 are partially transposed; (f) C1 and Pr3 are partially transposed; (g) C1 and C3 are partially transposed.
    Fig. 4. Effect of the transmissivity of the linear beam splitter on the quadripartite entanglement of the system: (a) C1 is partially transposed; (b) Pr1 is partially transposed; (c) Pr3 is partially transposed; (d) C3 is partially transposed; (e) C1 and Pr1 are partially transposed; (f) C1 and Pr3 are partially transposed; (g) C1 and C3 are partially transposed.
    The smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of all tripartite states as a function of power gains G1 and G2: (a)−(c) The smallest symplectic eigenvaluesv of tripartite state composed of C1, Pr1 and Pr3; (d)−(f) the smallest symplectic eigenvaluesv of tripartite state composed of C1, Pr1 and C3; (g)−(i) the smallest symplectic eigenvaluesv of tripartite state composed of C1, Pr3 and C3; (j)−(l) the smallest symplectic eigenvaluesv of tripartite state composed of Pr1, Pr3 and C3.
    Fig. 5. The smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of all tripartite states as a function of power gains G1 and G2: (a)−(c) The smallest symplectic eigenvaluesv of tripartite state composed of C1, Pr1 and Pr3; (d)−(f) the smallest symplectic eigenvaluesv of tripartite state composed of C1, Pr1 and C3; (g)−(i) the smallest symplectic eigenvaluesv of tripartite state composed of C1, Pr3 and C3; (j)−(l) the smallest symplectic eigenvaluesv of tripartite state composed of Pr1, Pr3 and C3.
    The smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of all bipartite states as a function of power gains G1 and G2: (a) The smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of C1 and Pr1; (b) the smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of C1 and Pr3; (c) the smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of C1 and C3; (d) the smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of Pr1 and Pr3; (e) the smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of Pr1 and C3; (f) the smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of Pr3 and C3.
    Fig. 6. The smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of all bipartite states as a function of power gains G1 and G2: (a) The smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of C1 and Pr1; (b) the smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of C1 and Pr3; (c) the smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of C1 and C3; (d) the smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of Pr1 and Pr3; (e) the smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of Pr1 and C3; (f) the smallest symplectic eigenvalues v of bipartite state composed of Pr3 and C3.
    数目二分形式数目二分形式
    11|23422|134
    33|12444|123
    512|34613|24
    714|23
    Table 1.

    Seven partitions of quadripartite state.

    四组份态的七种二分形式

    Sheng Yu, Huan-Zhang Liu, Sheng-Shuai Liu, Jie-Tai Jing. Generation of quadripartite entanglement based on four-wave mixing process and linear beam splitter[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(9): 090303-1
    Download Citation