• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 6, Issue 12, 1116 (2018)
Lin Li1, Chenliang Chang1、2、3、*, Caojin Yuan1, Shaotong Feng1, Shouping Nie1, Zhi-Cheng Ren2, Hui-Tian Wang2, and Jianping Ding2、4、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Opto-Electronic Technology, School of Physics and Technology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • 2National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 3e-mail: changchenliang@njnu.edu.cn
  • 4e-mail: jpding@nju.edu.cn
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.6.001116 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lin Li, Chenliang Chang, Caojin Yuan, Shaotong Feng, Shouping Nie, Zhi-Cheng Ren, Hui-Tian Wang, Jianping Ding. High efficiency generation of tunable ellipse perfect vector beams[J]. Photonics Research, 2018, 6(12): 1116 Copy Citation Text show less
    Reconstructed results of the ellipse beams with different topological charges [l1=2 for (a) and (b), l2=4 for (c) and (d)]. (a) and (c) are the intensity distributions. (b) and (d) are the phase distributions with differently marked topological charges.
    Fig. 1. Reconstructed results of the ellipse beams with different topological charges [l1=2 for (a) and (b), l2=4 for (c) and (d)]. (a) and (c) are the intensity distributions. (b) and (d) are the phase distributions with differently marked topological charges.
    Intensity distributions at the filtering (Fourier) plane from the phase-only CGH calculated by (a) the grating encoding method and (b) the proposed F-DCGS method. (c) Flow chart of the proposed F-DCGS algorithm.
    Fig. 2. Intensity distributions at the filtering (Fourier) plane from the phase-only CGH calculated by (a) the grating encoding method and (b) the proposed F-DCGS method. (c) Flow chart of the proposed F-DCGS algorithm.
    Schematic representation of the experiment setup for generating an EPVB. P, polarizer; BE, beam expander; SLM, spatial light modulator; L, convex lenses (f1=400 mm, f2=300 mm, and f3=100 mm); QWP, quarter-wave plate; R, Ronchi grating; CCD, charge-coupled device.
    Fig. 3. Schematic representation of the experiment setup for generating an EPVB. P, polarizer; BE, beam expander; SLM, spatial light modulator; L, convex lenses (f1=400  mm, f2=300  mm, and f3=100  mm); QWP, quarter-wave plate; R, Ronchi grating; CCD, charge-coupled device.
    Generated intensity of the EPVB from the phase-only CGH calculated (a), (b) by the grating encoding method and (c), (d) by the F-DCGS method. The arrow marks in (b) and (d) indicate the polarization direction of an analyzer before the CCD.
    Fig. 4. Generated intensity of the EPVB from the phase-only CGH calculated (a), (b) by the grating encoding method and (c), (d) by the F-DCGS method. The arrow marks in (b) and (d) indicate the polarization direction of an analyzer before the CCD.
    Experimental results of generating EPVBs under different ellipse modes and topological charges. The scaling factors are (a) a=1, b=0.5; (b) a=1, b=0.75; (c) a=1, b=1; (d) a=0.75, b=1; (e) a=0.5, b=1.
    Fig. 5. Experimental results of generating EPVBs under different ellipse modes and topological charges. The scaling factors are (a) a=1, b=0.5; (b) a=1, b=0.75; (c) a=1, b=1; (d) a=0.75, b=1; (e) a=0.5, b=1.
    Experimental intensity profiles of generating hybrid EPVBs after two analyzer directions.
    Fig. 6. Experimental intensity profiles of generating hybrid EPVBs after two analyzer directions.
    Experimental intensity patterns of the generated RPVBs. (a)–(d): RPVBs under different scaling modes of (a=1, b=0.5), (a=1, b=0.75), (a=0.75, b=1), and (a=0.5, b=1). (e) and (f) show hybrid RPVBs after two analyzer directions.
    Fig. 7. Experimental intensity patterns of the generated RPVBs. (a)–(d): RPVBs under different scaling modes of (a=1, b=0.5), (a=1, b=0.75), (a=0.75, b=1), and (a=0.5, b=1). (e) and (f) show hybrid RPVBs after two analyzer directions.
    Beam propagation in the xz and yz planes are displayed for the case of two beam shaping techniques. (a) Ellipse Bessel function method [3032" target="_self" style="display: inline;">–32]. (b) Our method. The beam intensity profiles before (z=−1 cm) and at (z=0) the focal plane are also shown in each case. (c) The one-dimensional beam intensity profile of the two methods at z=0 (red and blue color lines, respectively).
    Fig. 8. Beam propagation in the xz and yz planes are displayed for the case of two beam shaping techniques. (a) Ellipse Bessel function method [3032" target="_self" style="display: inline;">–32]. (b) Our method. The beam intensity profiles before (z=1  cm) and at (z=0) the focal plane are also shown in each case. (c) The one-dimensional beam intensity profile of the two methods at z=0 (red and blue color lines, respectively).
    Experimental results of the generated hybrid EPVBs in two different types of three-dimensional layouts under different analyzer directions.
    Fig. 9. Experimental results of the generated hybrid EPVBs in two different types of three-dimensional layouts under different analyzer directions.
    Lin Li, Chenliang Chang, Caojin Yuan, Shaotong Feng, Shouping Nie, Zhi-Cheng Ren, Hui-Tian Wang, Jianping Ding. High efficiency generation of tunable ellipse perfect vector beams[J]. Photonics Research, 2018, 6(12): 1116
    Download Citation