• High Power Laser and Particle Beams
  • Vol. 34, Issue 2, 026006 (2022)
Zhiyuan Feng, Kaiwen Li, Hao Luo, and Kan Wang
Author Affiliations
  • Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210309 Cite this Article
    Zhiyuan Feng, Kaiwen Li, Hao Luo, Kan Wang. Micro cross-section parameterization based on RMC code[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(2): 026006 Copy Citation Text show less
    Multi-physical conditions calculation process
    Fig. 1. Multi-physical conditions calculation process
    Burnable poison assembly geometry
    Fig. 2. Burnable poison assembly geometry
    Radial model of core
    Fig. 3. Radial model of core
    Comparison of multigroup RMC and continues energy RMC under 550 K
    Fig. 4. Comparison of multigroup RMC and continues energy RMC under 550 K
    Relative difference in radial power distribution under 0.05 MWD/tHM burnup
    Fig. 5. Relative difference in radial power distribution under 0.05 MWD/tHM burnup
    Relative difference in radial power distribution under 2.5 MWD/tHM burnup
    Fig. 6. Relative difference in radial power distribution under 2.5 MWD/tHM burnup
    Relative difference in radial power distribution under 11.5 MWD/tHM burnup
    Fig. 7. Relative difference in radial power distribution under 11.5 MWD/tHM burnup
    steptime/dayburnup(MWD/kgHM)
    00.000.00
    11.440.05
    22.880.10
    35.760.20
    48.640.30
    514.410.50
    621.610.75
    728.811.00
    843.221.50
    972.032.50
    10100.853.50
    11129.664.50
    12158.475.50
    13187.296.50
    14216.107.50
    15244.918.50
    16273.739.50
    17302.5410.50
    18331.3511.50
    Table 1. Setting of burnup
    step RMCContinuous energymulti-grouprelative error /pcm
    01.1798811.178647123.4
    11.1494561.14957511.9
    21.1666611.16565101.1
    31.1655311.164513101.8
    41.1642281.16365257.6
    51.1623471.161281106.6
    61.160691.16016952.1
    71.1590951.157965113
    81.1565141.154763175.1
    91.144951.14442252.8
    101.139641.138056158.4
    111.1353961.13471967.7
    121.1308321.13040942.3
    131.1264721.1263314.2
    141.1221241.12131680.8
    151.1178461.11747337.3
    161.1133751.11288149.4
    171.1086621.109897123.5
    181.1045641.10441115.3
    Table 2. Comparison of keff of multigroup RMC and continues energy RMC under 550 K
    Zhiyuan Feng, Kaiwen Li, Hao Luo, Kan Wang. Micro cross-section parameterization based on RMC code[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(2): 026006
    Download Citation