Author Affiliations
1National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Space and Optoelectronics Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China2Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of laser communication terminal device
Fig. 2. Scheme of mirror subassembly
Fig. 3. Diagrams of two kinds of flexible support structure
Fig. 4. Main parameters of flexible support structure
Fig. 5. Relationship between the center angle of grooved circle θ, RMS of surface shape and dynamic stiffness of assembly
Fig. 6. Schematic diagram of flexible support structure
Fig. 7. Finite element model of mirror subassembly
Fig. 8. Modal analysis nephogram
Fig. 9. Mirror subassembly object and assembly drawing of the whole machine
Fig. 10. System for mirror subassembly surface shape testing
Fig. 11. Results of mirror subassembly surface shape testing at different temperatures
Fig. 12. Sweep sine response test site of mirror subassembly
Fig. 13. Sweep sine response curve under Z vibration
Part | Material | ρ/g·cm−3 | E/GPa
| μ | α/℃
| Mirror | Zerodur | 2.53 | 90.6 | 0.23 | 0.05×10−6 | Support | 4J32 | 8.02 | 145 | 0.26 | 0.3×10−6 | Plate | TC4 | 4.44 | 109 | 0.29 | 8.9×10−6 |
|
Table 1. Material properties of reflector components
Level | Factors | △R/mm
| θ/(°)
| B/mm
| R2/mm
| r/mm
| 1 | 2.5 | 15 | 1 | 27 | 0.25 | 2 | 3 | 30 | 1.5 | 27.5 | 0.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 45 | 2 | 28 | 0.75 | 4 | 4 | 60 | 2.5 | 28.5 | 1 |
|
Table 2. Level table of parameter factors for flexible support structures
No. | △R | θ | B | R2 | r | P | 1 | 2.5 | 15 | 1 | 27 | 0.25 | 15.38 | 2 | 2.5 | 30 | 1.5 | 27.5 | 0.5 | 16.13 | 3 | 2.5 | 45 | 2 | 28 | 0.7.5 | 20.04 | 4 | 2.5 | 60 | 2.5 | 28.5 | 1 | 27.26 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 1.5 | 28 | 1 | 14.71 | 6 | 3 | 30 | 1 | 28.5 | 0.75 | 9.54 | 7 | 3 | 45 | 2.5 | 27 | 0.5 | 18.88 | 8 | 3 | 60 | 2 | 27.5 | 0.25 | 20.17 | 9 | 3.5 | 15 | 2 | 28.5 | 0.5 | 9.34 | 10 | 3.5 | 30 | 2.5 | 28 | 0.25 | 12.79 | 11 | 3.5 | 45 | 1 | 27.5 | 1 | 8.08 | 12 | 3.5 | 60 | 1.5 | 27 | 0.75 | 12.66 | 13 | 4 | 15 | 2.5 | 27.5 | 0.75 | 22.35 | 14 | 4 | 30 | 2 | 27 | 1 | 10.73 | 15 | 4 | 45 | 1.5 | 28.5 | 0.25 | 13.28 | 16 | 4 | 60 | 1 | 28 | 0.5 | 19.54 |
|
Table 3. Orthogonal test scheme
Number | A | B | C | D | E | Factors | △R | θ | B | R2 | r | N1 | 19.7 | 15.45 | 13.14 | 14.41 | 15.4 | N2 | 15.83 | 12.29 | 14.19 | 16.68 | 15.97 | N2 | 10.72 | 15.07 | 15.07 | 16.77 | 16.15 | N4 | 16.48 | 19.41 | 19.82 | 14.86 | 15.19 | R | 8.98 | 7.12 | 6.68 | 2.36 | 0.96 |
|
Table 4. Range analysis of factors
Order | Fz/Hz
| Mode of vibration | 1 | 352.61 | Around X axis direction
| 2 | 486.29 | Around Y axis direction
| 3 | 488.98 | Around Y axis direction
|
|
Table 5. Results of modal analysis of mirror subassembly
Load case direction | Temperature rise | | Temperature reduction | PV | RMS | PV | RMS | X | λ/10.84
| λ/58.27
| | λ/10.69
| λ/57.84
| Y | λ/10.76
| λ/58.11
| λ/10.84
| λ/57.79
| Z | λ/10.14
| λ/54.97
| λ/11.4
| λ/60.61
|
|
Table 6. Analysis results of mirror surface error under 10 ℃ uniform temperature rise(reduction) and 1 g gravity(Unit: nm)
Temperature/℃ | PV | RMS | 10 | λ/6.62
| λ/43
| 20 | λ/6.94
| λ/52
| 30 | λ/6.9
| λ/50
|
|
Table 7. Results of mirror subassembly surface shape testing(Unit: nm)