Author Affiliations
1 Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China2 Institutes for Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China4 Key Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Process, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China5 Faculty of Robot Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Illustration of satellite self-rotation and precession
Fig. 2. Flow chart of satellite motion parameter identification algorithm
Fig. 3. Diagram of circle fitting
Fig. 4. Diagram of relationship among motion parameters
Fig. 5. Function introduction of simulation software. (a) Size of satellite model and initial azimuth information of sensor model;(b)-(d) parameters of camera model, setting interface of motion parameters, and data acquisition interface in simulation software
Fig. 6. Illustration of satellite data. (a) Color image; (b) depth image; (c) 3D point cloud
Fig. 7. Registration error between two adjacent point clouds. (a) α; (b) β; (c) γ; (d) tx; (e) ty; (f) tz
Fig. 8. Comparison between two adjacent point clouds before and after registration. (a) Before registration; (b) after registration
Fig. 9. Results of circle fitting under different Gaussian noise. (a) σ=0.01 m; (b) σ=0.02 m; (c) σ=0.03 m; (d) σ=0.04 m; (e) σ=0.05 m; (f) σ=0.06 m; (g) σ=0.07 m; (h) σ=0.08 m; (i) σ=0.09 m
Fig. 10. Errors of center of circle, radius and normal angle of fitting circle under different level of noise.(a) Center of circle; (b) radius; (c) normal vector
Fig. 11. Estimated error of each group of three estimated parameters. (a) Angular velocity of precession; (b) angular velocity of spin; (c) angle of nutation
Fig. 12. Parameter identification error changes with point cloud noise intensity. (a) Angular velocity of precession; (b) angular velocity of spin; (c) angle of nutation
Fig. 13. Illustration of satellite data. (a) Color image; (b) depth image; (c) 3D point cloud
Fig. 14. Intermediate results of parameter identification. (a) Point cloud of satellite; (b) motion track of point on satellite; (c) distribution of estimated speed of self-rotation
Group | Ground truth | Estimated value |
---|
ωs /[(°)∙s-1] | ωm /[(°)∙s-1] | θ /(°) | ωs /[(°)∙s-1] | ωm /[(°)∙s-1] | θ /(°) |
---|
G1 | 100 | 30 | 20 | 99.8 | 30.6 | 19.7 | G2 | 120 | 30 | 40 | 119.6 | 30.0 | 40.0 | G3 | 90 | 30 | 40 | 93.4 | 30.1 | 39.8 | G4 | 70 | 20 | 20 | 71.5 | 19.1 | 20.3 | G5 | 50 | 20 | 20 | 51.1 | 19.1 | 18.4 | G6 | 120 | 30 | 20 | 107.4 | 26.3 | 19.4 | G7 | 100 | 30 | 20 | 98.4 | 31.1 | 26.1 | G8 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 66.2 | 30.8 | 30.6 | G9 | 80 | 30 | 20 | 79.7 | 29.4 | 21.4 | G10 | 50 | 10 | 30 | 45.3 | 10.9 | 31.1 | G11 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 60.1 | 29.5 | 29.8 | G12 | 100 | 20 | 30 | 99.6 | 20.0 | 30.1 | G13 | 100 | 40 | 10 | 95.8 | 40.8 | 10.4 | G14 | 80 | 30 | 30 | 80.0 | 29.7 | 30.4 | G15 | 50 | 10 | 20 | 50.1 | 10.1 | 19.2 |
|
Table 1. Identification results under 15 different groups of motion parameters by our method