• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 44, Issue 7, 0734001 (2024)
Jin Zhao1、3, Chenglong Wang2、*, and Hong Yu1、2、3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory for Quantum Optics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2Zhangjiang Laboratory, Shanghai 201210, China
  • 3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS231923 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jin Zhao, Chenglong Wang, Hong Yu. Cosmic Ray Rejection in Small Angle X-Ray Scattering[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(7): 0734001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of small-angle X-ray scattering measurement
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of small-angle X-ray scattering measurement
    Schematic diagram of process for removing cosmic ray in SAXS measurement pattern
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of process for removing cosmic ray in SAXS measurement pattern
    Numerical simulation results of SAXS measuring periodic nanostructure. (a) Simulated long exposure SAXS measuring pattern; (b) simulated short exposure SAXS measuring pattern; (c) calibrate level of each spot in simulated long exposure SAXS measurement pattern; (d) mask for cosmic ray rejection by proposed method; (e) simulated long exposure SAXS measuring pattern after cosmic ray rejection by proposed method with ROI mask
    Fig. 3. Numerical simulation results of SAXS measuring periodic nanostructure. (a) Simulated long exposure SAXS measuring pattern; (b) simulated short exposure SAXS measuring pattern; (c) calibrate level of each spot in simulated long exposure SAXS measurement pattern; (d) mask for cosmic ray rejection by proposed method; (e) simulated long exposure SAXS measuring pattern after cosmic ray rejection by proposed method with ROI mask
    Confusion matrix of detection results of proposed method
    Fig. 4. Confusion matrix of detection results of proposed method
    SAXS measuring patterns before and after denoising by three methods respectively under ROI mask. (a) Before denosing; (b) denoised by Laplacian edge detection; (c) denoised by multi-frame median pixel rejection; (d) denoised by proposed method
    Fig. 5. SAXS measuring patterns before and after denoising by three methods respectively under ROI mask. (a) Before denosing; (b) denoised by Laplacian edge detection; (c) denoised by multi-frame median pixel rejection; (d) denoised by proposed method
    Relationship between RPSN and FS of patterns before and after denoising by three methods respectively
    Fig. 6. Relationship between RPSN and FS of patterns before and after denoising by three methods respectively
    IndexEMSRPSN /dBSS /%
    Before denoising5.49×10-432.6097.62
    Denoised by Laplacian edge detection6.41×10-431.9397.08
    Denoised by multi-frame median pixel rejection2.92×10-435.3498.59
    Denoised by proposed method1.53×10-438.1599.34
    Table 1. Evaluation indexes of denoised patterns before and after denoising by three methods respectively
    Jin Zhao, Chenglong Wang, Hong Yu. Cosmic Ray Rejection in Small Angle X-Ray Scattering[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(7): 0734001
    Download Citation