• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 21, 2114005 (2021)
Dewei Deng1、2, Qinghua Fan1, Xianglu Zhao1, Yushan Ma3, Zhiye Huang2, Qi Sun2, Shuhua Yang2, and Yong Zhang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Solidification Control and Digital Preparation Technology(Liaoning Province), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian , Liaoning 116024, China
  • 2Shenyang Blower Works Group Corporation, Shenyang , Liaoning 110869, China
  • 3Wuzhong Instrument Co., Ltd., Wuzhong , Ningxia 751100, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.2114005 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Dewei Deng, Qinghua Fan, Xianglu Zhao, Yushan Ma, Zhiye Huang, Qi Sun, Shuhua Yang, Yong Zhang. Influence of Processing Parameters on Surface Roughness for Laser Cleaning of FV520B Steel Oxide Layer[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(21): 2114005 Copy Citation Text show less
    Laser cleaning equipment
    Fig. 1. Laser cleaning equipment
    Schematic of laser scanning path and spot overlap
    Fig. 2. Schematic of laser scanning path and spot overlap
    XPS full spectrum of FV520B steel oxide layer sample
    Fig. 3. XPS full spectrum of FV520B steel oxide layer sample
    Element contents of FV520B steel oxide layer sample prepared by polishing
    Fig. 4. Element contents of FV520B steel oxide layer sample prepared by polishing
    Roughness of prepared FV520B steel samples with and without oxide layer for different abrasive papers
    Fig. 5. Roughness of prepared FV520B steel samples with and without oxide layer for different abrasive papers
    Roughness of FV520B steel oxide layer sample after cleaning when frequency is 20 kHz
    Fig. 6. Roughness of FV520B steel oxide layer sample after cleaning when frequency is 20 kHz
    Surface morphologies of FV520B steel oxide layer samples before and after laser cleaning for different powers. (a) Before cleaning; (b) cleaning with power of 40 W; (c) cleaning with power of 80 W; (d) cleaning with power of 120 W; (e) cleaning with power of 160 W; (f) cleaning with power of 200 W
    Fig. 7. Surface morphologies of FV520B steel oxide layer samples before and after laser cleaning for different powers. (a) Before cleaning; (b) cleaning with power of 40 W; (c) cleaning with power of 80 W; (d) cleaning with power of 120 W; (e) cleaning with power of 160 W; (f) cleaning with power of 200 W
    SEM images of FV520B steel oxide layer samples after laser cleaning with different laser powers when pulse frequency is 20 kHz. (a) 40 W; (b) 80 W; (c) 120 W; (d) 160 W; (e) 200 W
    Fig. 8. SEM images of FV520B steel oxide layer samples after laser cleaning with different laser powers when pulse frequency is 20 kHz. (a) 40 W; (b) 80 W; (c) 120 W; (d) 160 W; (e) 200 W
    Surface morphologies of FV520B steel oxide layer samples after one time laser cleaning at different frequencies when laser power is 120 W. (a) 20 kHz; (b) 30 kHz;(c) 40 kHz; (d) 50 kHz
    Fig. 9. Surface morphologies of FV520B steel oxide layer samples after one time laser cleaning at different frequencies when laser power is 120 W. (a) 20 kHz; (b) 30 kHz;(c) 40 kHz; (d) 50 kHz
    Roughness of FV520B steel oxide layer sample after one time laser cleaning at different frequencies when laser power is 120 W
    Fig. 10. Roughness of FV520B steel oxide layer sample after one time laser cleaning at different frequencies when laser power is 120 W
    Roughness of FV520B steel oxide layer sample after laser cleaning for different cleaning times when laser power is 120 W and pulse frequency is 20 kHz
    Fig. 11. Roughness of FV520B steel oxide layer sample after laser cleaning for different cleaning times when laser power is 120 W and pulse frequency is 20 kHz
    SEM images of oxide layer samples after laser cleaning with laser power of 120 W and pulse frequency of 20 kHz for different cleaning times. (a) One time; (b) two times; (c) three times; (d) four times; (e) five times; (f) ten times; (g) locally magnified region in dotted box of Fig.12 (b)
    Fig. 12. SEM images of oxide layer samples after laser cleaning with laser power of 120 W and pulse frequency of 20 kHz for different cleaning times. (a) One time; (b) two times; (c) three times; (d) four times; (e) five times; (f) ten times; (g) locally magnified region in dotted box of Fig.12 (b)
    Schematic of laser cleaning for FV520B steel oxide layer sample with laser power of 120 W and pulse frequency of 20 kHz
    Fig. 13. Schematic of laser cleaning for FV520B steel oxide layer sample with laser power of 120 W and pulse frequency of 20 kHz
    Roughness histograms of oxide layer samples prepared after polishing with different grades of abrasive papers and after laser cleaning with laser power of 120 W and pulse frequency of 20 kHz for one time or two times
    Fig. 14. Roughness histograms of oxide layer samples prepared after polishing with different grades of abrasive papers and after laser cleaning with laser power of 120 W and pulse frequency of 20 kHz for one time or two times
    Surface morphologies of oxide layer samples prepared after polishing with different grades of abrasive papers and after one time laser cleaning with 120 W/20 kHz. (a) 200#; (b) 400#; (c) 600#; (d) 800#
    Fig. 15. Surface morphologies of oxide layer samples prepared after polishing with different grades of abrasive papers and after one time laser cleaning with 120 W/20 kHz. (a) 200#; (b) 400#; (c) 600#; (d) 800#
    ParameterContent
    LaserPulsed fiber laser
    Wavelength /nm1064
    Laser spot size /(μm×μm)(400±20)×(400±20)
    Focal length /mm140
    Laser scanning width /mm100
    Pulse duration /ns100±10
    Maximum power /W200
    Maximum pulse frequency /kHz50
    Table 1. Device parameters
    ElementCCrNiCuTiVMoSiMnPSFe
    Mass fraction /%0.0513.725.651.710.010.051.440.360.520.0270.027Bal.
    Table 2. Element contents of FV520B steel plate
    Investigation factorAbrasive grade for grinding pretreatment /#

    Laser power

    P /W

    Pulse frequency

    f /kHz

    Cleaning time
    Power20040,80,120,160,200201
    Frequency20012020,30,40,501
    Cleaning time200120201,2,3,4,5,10
    Initial roughness of substrate200,400,600,800120201,2
    Table 3. Experimental parameters
    Dewei Deng, Qinghua Fan, Xianglu Zhao, Yushan Ma, Zhiye Huang, Qi Sun, Shuhua Yang, Yong Zhang. Influence of Processing Parameters on Surface Roughness for Laser Cleaning of FV520B Steel Oxide Layer[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(21): 2114005
    Download Citation