Author Affiliations
1Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei23003,China2Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei23003,China3Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei23003,Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Flow chart of FWA
Fig. 2. Convergence process of FWA (a) fitness, (b) explosion amplitude
Fig. 3. Fusion results of “ground” infrared-polarization image (a) infrared-intensity image, (b) infrared-polarization image, (c) FWA, (d) LP, (e) GP, (f) PCA, (g) MP, (h) DWT, (i) SIDWT
Fig. 4. Fusion results of “truck” infrared-polarization image (a) infrared-intensity image, (b) infrared-polarization image, (c) FWA, (d) LP, (e) GP, (f) PCA, (g) MP, (h) DWT, (i) SIDWT
Fig. 5. Fusion results of “car” infrared-polarization image (a) infrared-intensity image, (b) infrared-polarization image, (c) FWA, (d) LP, (e) GP, (f) PCA, (g) MP, (h) DWT, (i) SIDWT
火花生成算法伪代码 |
---|
1: for to do | 2: | 3: 随机选择个维度, | 4: | 5: for to do | 6: | 7: end for | 8: end for |
|
Table 1. 规则火花生成伪代码
火花生成算法伪代码 |
---|
1: for to do | 2: | 3: 随机选择个维度, | 4: | 5: for to do | 6: | 7: end for | 8: end for |
|
Table 2. 变异火花生成伪代码
Algorithm | Algorithm setting |
---|
FWA | Dim=4, Seed Num=10, Son Num=30, Maximum Iterations=500 | LP | Level=4, Highpass combination: choose max, Lowpass combination: average | GP | Level=4, Highpass combination: choose max, Lowpass combination: average | PCA | | MP | Level=4, Highpass combination: choose max, Lowpass combination: average | DWT | Level=4, Highpass combination: choose max, Lowpass combination: average | SIDWT | Level=4, Highpass combination: choose max, Lowpass combination: average |
|
Table 3. 实验所用融合算法设置
Metrics | RE | FSSIM | FMI |
---|
FWA | 0.7774 | 1.4149 | 1.5462 | LP | 1.2245 | 1.3532 | 1.0964 | GP | 1.7645 | 1.4090 | 1.2368 | PCA | 1.6119 | 1.1061 | 1.7559 | MP | 0.9401 | 1.2618 | 1.0168 | DWT | 1.2921 | 1.3124 | 1.0137 | SIDWT | 1.2953 | 1.3649 | 1.0908 |
|
Table 4. “ground”的红外强度和偏振度图融合结果客观评价
Metrics | RE | FSSIM | FMI |
---|
FWA | 0.3253 | 1.7744 | 3.3937 | LP | 0.3798 | 1.7211 | 2.1439 | GP | 0.4080 | 1.7701 | 2.2947 | PCA | 0.3385 | 1.7955 | 2.7763 | MP | 0.3947 | 1.6492 | 1.9312 | DWT | 0.3915 | 1.6893 | 2.1045 | SIDWT | 0.3871 | 1.7409 | 2.1856 |
|
Table 5. “truck”的红外强度和偏振度图融合结果客观评价
Metrics | RE | FSSIM | FMI |
---|
FWA | 2.2053 | 1.2559 | 2.3473 | LP | 2.9673 | 1.1467 | 1.3457 | GP | 3.0748 | 1.2267 | 1.5746 | PCA | 2.6545 | 1.1711 | 3.3017 | MP | 2.9885 | 1.0695 | 1.2487 | DWT | 2.9697 | 1.1477 | 1.2587 | SIDWT | 2.9647 | 1.1764 | 1.3705 |
|
Table 6. “car”的红外强度和偏振度图融合结果客观评价
Metrics | MI (2a,2f) | MI (2b,2f) | MI (3a,3f) | MI (3b,3f) | MI (4a,4f) | MI (4b,4f) |
---|
MI | 0.2669 | 1.4890 | 1.9571 | 0.8192 | 2.9449 | 0.3568 |
|
Table 7. 互信息计算结果
| ground | truck | car |
---|
RE | FWA>MP>LP>DWT>SIDWT>GP | FWA>LP>SIDWT>DWT>MP>GP | FWA>SIDWT>LP>DWT>MP>GP | FSSIM | FWA>GP>SIDWT>LP>DWT>MP | FWA>GP>SIDWT>LP>DWT>MP | FWA>GP>SIDWT>DWT>LP>MP | FMI | FWA>GP>LP>SIDWT>MP>DWT | FWA>GP>SIDWT>LP>DWT>MP | FWA>GP>SIDWT>LP>DWT>MP |
|
Table 8. 算法性能排序