• Progress in Geography
  • Vol. 39, Issue 7, 1095 (2020)
Yujuan GE1, Yuluan ZHAO1、2、*, and Xiubin LI2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
  • 2Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.07.003 Cite this Article
    Yujuan GE, Yuluan ZHAO, Xiubin LI. Farmland fragmentation and land use intensity in mountain areas: A case study of Yayu Village, Guizhou Province[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(7): 1095 Copy Citation Text show less
    研究区概况Fig.1
    Fig. 1. 研究区概况Fig.1
    6种情景的通勤距离描述Fig.2
    Fig. 2. 6种情景的通勤距离描述Fig.2
    基于6种情景的农户耕地细碎化指数比较Fig.3
    Fig. 3. 基于6种情景的农户耕地细碎化指数比较Fig.3
    农户耕地细碎化程度分布情况Fig.4
    Fig. 4. 农户耕地细碎化程度分布情况Fig.4
    农户耕地细碎化与劳动力投入之间的关系Fig.5
    Fig. 5. 农户耕地细碎化与劳动力投入之间的关系Fig.5
    农户耕地细碎化与资本投入之间的关系Fig.6
    Fig. 6. 农户耕地细碎化与资本投入之间的关系Fig.6
    农户耕地细碎化对增产性投入与省工性投入的影响Fig.7
    Fig. 7. 农户耕地细碎化对增产性投入与省工性投入的影响Fig.7
    农户耕地细碎化与单位面积作物产值之间的关系Fig.8
    Fig. 8. 农户耕地细碎化与单位面积作物产值之间的关系Fig.8
    农户耕地细碎化指数与耕地撂荒之间的关系Fig.9
    Fig. 9. 农户耕地细碎化指数与耕地撂荒之间的关系Fig.9
    农户类型农业收入比重/%农户数量/户农户比例/%
    纯农户70~1002914.872
    兼业户30~7012966.154
    非农户0~303718.974
    Table 1.

    亚鱼村样本农户基本特征

    调查项目最小值最大值均值标准差变异系数/%
    地块层面(2484块)
    地块面积/hm20.0010.5650.0430.045104.651
    地块周长/m10.0586.895.354.557.264
    农户层面(195户)
    农户耕作距离/m36.7121281.38204.911233.4136.911
    农户耕作地块数/块14612.7387.37357.882
    农户耕地总面积/hm20.0082.0340.5480.33761.496
    农户人均耕地面积/hm20.0021.2900.1520.162106.579
    农户平均地块面积/hm20.0080.1870.0460.02350.000
    Table 2.

    亚鱼村样本农户耕作地块特征描述性统计结果

    耕地利用情况播种撂荒流转
    耕地面积/hm238.45562.6085.865
    耕地地块数/块8401519125
    占全部耕地面积的比例/%35.96358.5525.485
    Table 3.

    亚鱼村样本农户耕地利用情况

    种植作物种植农户/户种植面积/hm2种植地块数/块占总种植面积的比例/%
    水稻14322.24838057.855
    玉米11112.77537233.221
    辣椒70.34070.885
    红薯60.300110.780
    油菜50.687231.789
    花生40.24080.625
    大豆30.14240.369
    黄桃40.556111.446
    西瓜20.43161.120
    葡萄10.329130.856
    桂花树20.21730.565
    车厘子10.19010.496
    Table 4.

    亚鱼村样本农户农作物种植结构

    不同通勤距离情景指数最小值最大值均值标准差
    农户耕地细碎化指数LFI_A28.981315.147119.40042.264
    农户耕地细碎化指数LFI_A′28.981960.559175.595118.734
    农户耕地细碎化指数LFI_B52.5871222.198304.263203.327
    农户耕地细碎化指数LFI_B′56.2491536.221370.227250.510
    农户耕地细碎化指数LFI_C29.1641307.378179.293161.664
    农户耕地细碎化指数LFI_C′29.4221643.830213.640207.732
    Table 5.

    基于6种情景的农户耕地细碎化程度评价结果

    最小值最大值均值标准差变异系数/%
    劳动力投入/(d/hm2)60.9656.2169.088.352.275
    资本投入/(元/hm2)1244.417591.95942.93241.154.537
    增产性投入/(元/hm2)1244.410372.03782.51827.948.326
    省工性投入/(元/hm2)09218.12160.52090.696.765
    单位面积作物产值/(元/hm2)4684.020395.311228.82987.426.605
    Table 6.

    样本农户土地集约利用情况

    农户耕地细碎化等级户数/户耕地细碎化指数平均值劳动力投入/(d/hm2)资本投入/(元/hm2)单位面积作物产值/(元/hm2)
    总量增产性投入省工性投入
    微度1479.499256.98212.84799.33413.514194.8
    轻度56129.189167.26667.93940.22727.611330.8
    中度40171.161171.75362.33610.81751.510993.2
    较重度16221.713141.14830.73507.01323.710675.0
    重度11266.180150.14647.63336.41311.310261.7
    极重度12435.002119.94517.13208.11308.99702.8
    Table 7.

    亚鱼村不同农户耕地细碎化水平下耕地利用情况

    Yujuan GE, Yuluan ZHAO, Xiubin LI. Farmland fragmentation and land use intensity in mountain areas: A case study of Yayu Village, Guizhou Province[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(7): 1095
    Download Citation