• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 9, 0929001 (2020)
Jin Xu1、2, Yangning Guo2, Ningning Luo2, Shujing Li2, Jiulin Shi1、2、*, and Xingdao He1、2、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Nondestructive Test, Ministry of Education, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330063, China
  • 2Jiangxi Engineering Laboratory for Optoelectronics Testing Technology, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330063, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.0929001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jin Xu, Yangning Guo, Ningning Luo, Shujing Li, Jiulin Shi, Xingdao He. Influence of Water Temperature on Temporal Coherence of Stimulated Brillouin Scattering[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 0929001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of experimental measurement
    Fig. 1. Schematic of experimental measurement
    SBS interference images under different optical path differences. (a) 0 m; (b) 0.2 m; (c) 0.4 m; (d) 0.6 m
    Fig. 2. SBS interference images under different optical path differences. (a) 0 m; (b) 0.2 m; (c) 0.4 m; (d) 0.6 m
    Fringe visibility under different optical path differences
    Fig. 3. Fringe visibility under different optical path differences
    SBS interference images under different temperatures. (a) 30 ℃; (b) 20 ℃; (c) 10 ℃; (d) 5 ℃
    Fig. 4. SBS interference images under different temperatures. (a) 30 ℃; (b) 20 ℃; (c) 10 ℃; (d) 5 ℃
    Pulse waveforms after SBS interference under different temperatures. (a) 30 ℃; (b) 5 ℃
    Fig. 5. Pulse waveforms after SBS interference under different temperatures. (a) 30 ℃; (b) 5 ℃
    Fringe visibility versus temperature
    Fig. 6. Fringe visibility versus temperature
    Pulse duration of SBS versus temperature
    Fig. 7. Pulse duration of SBS versus temperature
    Interference images and pulse waveforms under different optical path differences when T is 10 ℃. (a) Interference image at 0.1 m; (b) pulse waveform at 0.1 m; (c) interference image at 0.4 m; (d) pulse waveform at 0.4 m
    Fig. 8. Interference images and pulse waveforms under different optical path differences when T is 10 ℃. (a) Interference image at 0.1 m; (b) pulse waveform at 0.1 m; (c) interference image at 0.4 m; (d) pulse waveform at 0.4 m
    Interference images and pulse waveforms under different optical path differences when T is 20 ℃. (a) Interference image at 0.1 m; (b) pulse waveform at 0.1 m; (c) interference image at 0.4 m; (d) pulse waveform at 0.4 m
    Fig. 9. Interference images and pulse waveforms under different optical path differences when T is 20 ℃. (a) Interference image at 0.1 m; (b) pulse waveform at 0.1 m; (c) interference image at 0.4 m; (d) pulse waveform at 0.4 m
    T /℃51015202530
    Complex degree of coherence0.050.160.210.410.650.66
    Table 1. Complex degree of coherence at different temperatures when Δ is 0.3 m
    Δ /m00.10.20.30.4
    Complex degree of coherence1.000.750.270.210.12
    Table 2. Complex degree of coherence at different optical path differences when T is 15 ℃
    Jin Xu, Yangning Guo, Ningning Luo, Shujing Li, Jiulin Shi, Xingdao He. Influence of Water Temperature on Temporal Coherence of Stimulated Brillouin Scattering[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 0929001
    Download Citation