Fig. 1. A flow chart of the retrieval of cloud macro-physical parameters using Ka-MMCR measurements
Fig. 2. Retrieval results for cumulonimbus and stratocumulus clouds on August 31, 2015, (a) and (b) are radar reflectivity before and after sidelobe removal, (c) and (d) are radar-retrieved CBHs and CTHs for previous and our methods, 1st and 2nd denote the first-layer and second-layer clouds
Fig. 3. Comparisons of MMCR- and CL31 derived CBHs (a), and comparisons of MMCR- and HW8- derived CTHs (b); the black and red crosses indicate non-precipitating and precipitating cases, respectively, and the black dashed lines denote the equal lines
Fig. 4. Deviations between the MMCR- and CL31- derived CBHs () and between the MMCR- and HW8- derived CTHs (), (a) and (b) represent non-precipitating clouds, (c) and (d) represent precipitating clouds, the case number N, the average , and the standard deviation σ for deviations are shown in each panel
Fig. 5. Occurrences of the MMCR-retrieved CBHs (a), CTHs (b), and CTKs (c) at different height levels during the observation period, and comparisons of the retrievals of CLNs (d), CBHs (e), and CTHs (f) derived by the MMCR, CL31, and HW8
Fig. 6. Diurnal variations of the MMCR-derived CBH (a), CTH (b), CTK (c), and CF (d); each hour corresponds to a boxplot, in which the bottom and top edges of the box indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, the central cross-bar indicates the median, the upper and lower dotted line extend to the maximum and minimum; the solid lines with circles represent the averages; (e) is the statistical comparison of CBHs between MMCR and CL31; (f) is the statistical comparison of CTHs between MMCR and HW8
Fig. 7. Radar reflectivities of mixed precipitating clouds observed by the CWR (a) and MMCR (b) at Yangjiang of Guangdong on June 10, 2014; (c) and (d) are radar-derived CTHs and corresponding ground minutely rain rate R
Fig. 8. Radar reflectivities of CWR (a), MMCR before (b) and after (c) sidelobe removal for convective clouds and precipitation that happened at Yangjiang of Guangdong on April 15, 2014
Fig. 9. Frequency distributions of CBH and CTH retrieved biases for 50 simulated cloud profiles
Fig. 10. (a)10 Minimum reflectivities at different height levels observed by the MMCR during the observational period, and(b) probability distribution functions of radar reflectivities corresponding to the retrieved CBHs and CTHs
云宏观参数 反演误差 | 云类 | 误差统计量 /km |
---|
5th | 25th | 50th | 75th | 95th | 平均数 | 标准差 |
---|
ΔCBH | AC | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.33 | 0.60 | 1.17 | 0.45 | 0.53 | LC | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.23 | 0.21 | MC | 0.03 | 0.21 | 0.51 | 0.69 | 1.08 | 0.49 | 0.35 | HC | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 1.74 | 0.65 | 0.93 | ΔCTH | AC | -2.22 | -1.05 | -0.60 | -0.18 | -0.03 | -0.96 | 1.37 | LC | -2.01 | -1.02 | -0.63 | -0.24 | -0.03 | -0.97 | 1.36 | MC | -2.37 | -1.08 | -0.51 | -0.12 | -0.03 | -1.01 | 1.47 | HC | -1.83 | -0.99 | -0.18 | -0.03 | -0.03 | -0.64 | 0.89 | ΔCTK | AC | -2.1 | -1.02 | -0.57 | -0.21 | -0.03 | -0.79 | 0.97 | LC | -1.86 | -0.96 | -0.48 | -0.15 | -0.03 | -0.79 | 1.15 | MC | -1.95 | -1.08 | -0.57 | -0.21 | -0.03 | -0.85 | 1.07 | HC | -1.23 | -0.57 | -0.27 | -0.06 | -0.03 | -0.43 | 0.57 |
|
Table 1. Statistical results of ΔCBH, ΔCTH and ΔCTK for different cloud types after sidelobe removal