• Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
  • Vol. 41, Issue 12, 3815 (2021)
Wen-bao JIA1、*, Xin-ru TANG1、1;, Xin-lei ZHANG1、1;, Jin-fa SHAO2、2;, Gen-chao XIONG1、1;, Yong-sheng LING1、1;, Dai-qian HEI3、3;, and Qing SHAN1、1; *;
Author Affiliations
  • 11. Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, College of Materials Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
  • 22. Key Laboratory of Ray Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • 33. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2021)12-3815-07 Cite this Article
    Wen-bao JIA, Xin-ru TANG, Xin-lei ZHANG, Jin-fa SHAO, Gen-chao XIONG, Yong-sheng LING, Dai-qian HEI, Qing SHAN. Study on Sample Preparation Method of Plant Powder Samples for Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(12): 3815 Copy Citation Text show less
    Contribution of instrument and sample preparation uncertainties to the global precision of the TXRF results
    Fig. 1. Contribution of instrument and sample preparation uncertainties to the global precision of the TXRF results
    Effect of sample amount on net counts
    Fig. 2. Effect of sample amount on net counts
    Influence of sample amount on relative standard deviation
    Fig. 3. Influence of sample amount on relative standard deviation
    Influence of sample amount on limits of detection
    Fig. 4. Influence of sample amount on limits of detection
    Effect of particle distribution size on net counts
    Fig. 5. Effect of particle distribution size on net counts
    Influence of particle size distribution on TXRF measurement result
    Fig. 6. Influence of particle size distribution on TXRF measurement result
    Influence of particle size distribution on average uncertainty
    Fig. 7. Influence of particle size distribution on average uncertainty
    元素认证结果/
    (mg·kg-1)
    测量值/
    (mg·kg-1)
    检出限/
    (mg·kg-1)
    RSD/
    %
    回收
    率/%
    P2 250±1202 518±3260.24011.60119.93
    S1 930±1202 212±2490.15011.10114.66
    K7 000±4008 296±790.2118.62118.53
    Ca4 560±1804 859±1 1170.14412.43106.56
    Fe1 130±701 026±1950.0556.2390.79
    Table 1. The certified and measured values of standard samples, detection limits of elements and relative standard deviations under the measurement condition
    元素ICP认证结果
    /(mg·kg-1)
    TXRF(1% Triton X-100)TXRF(H2O)
    测量值/(mg·kg-1)RSD/%回收率/%测量值/(mg·kg-1)RSD/%回收率/%
    P3 733±143 040±51216.8481.432 699±2469.1272.29
    S2 633±112 453±45918.7393.172 186±25411.6483.01
    K22 440±10222 717±2 0479.01101.2319 148±7603.9785.33
    Ca4 576±233 740±80821.6081.743 841±942.4583.95
    Mn575.5±18492.6±438.7585.68501.5±183.6587.22
    Table 2. De-ionized water, and Triton X-100 (1%) as disperser agents compared with ICP
    Wen-bao JIA, Xin-ru TANG, Xin-lei ZHANG, Jin-fa SHAO, Gen-chao XIONG, Yong-sheng LING, Dai-qian HEI, Qing SHAN. Study on Sample Preparation Method of Plant Powder Samples for Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(12): 3815
    Download Citation