• Matter and Radiation at Extremes
  • Vol. 4, Issue 1, 014401 (2019)
Xing-Long Zhu1,2, Min Chen1,2, Tong-Pu Yu3, Su-Ming Weng1,2..., Feng He1,2 and Zheng-Ming Sheng1,2,4,5,a)|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory for Laser Plasmas (MoE), School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 2Collaborative Innovation Center of IFSA, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 3Department of Physics, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
  • 4SUPA, Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0NG, UK
  • 5Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1063/1.5083914 Cite this Article
    Xing-Long Zhu, Min Chen, Tong-Pu Yu, Su-Ming Weng, Feng He, Zheng-Ming Sheng. Collimated GeV attosecond electron–positron bunches from a plasma channel driven by 10 PW lasers[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2019, 4(1): 014401 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Schematic of the generation of collimated GeV positron jets by the interaction of two 10 PW laser pulses with a plasma channel filled with NCD plasma. The drive pulse (laser #1) and probe pulse (laser #2) are incident from the left and right sides, respectively. Two cases are considered: (b) a plasma channel with a radially symmetric density profile and (c) a uniform plasma slab.
    Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of the generation of collimated GeV positron jets by the interaction of two 10 PW laser pulses with a plasma channel filled with NCD plasma. The drive pulse (laser #1) and probe pulse (laser #2) are incident from the left and right sides, respectively. Two cases are considered: (b) a plasma channel with a radially symmetric density profile and (c) a uniform plasma slab.
    (a) Energy spectra of electrons at t=58T0. (b) Transverse electric fields along the laser propagation axis. The insets in (a) and (b) show the distributions of the trapped electron energy density and laser transverse electric field, respectively, in the case of a plasma channel (top) and a uniform plasma slab (bottom). (c) and (d) show the distributions of the parameter η along the x axis in the case of a plasma channel and a uniform plasma slab, respectively.
    Fig. 2. (a) Energy spectra of electrons at t=58T0. (b) Transverse electric fields along the laser propagation axis. The insets in (a) and (b) show the distributions of the trapped electron energy density and laser transverse electric field, respectively, in the case of a plasma channel (top) and a uniform plasma slab (bottom). (c) and (d) show the distributions of the parameter η along the x axis in the case of a plasma channel and a uniform plasma slab, respectively.
    (a) Energy spectra of γ rays at t=68T0. The insets show the energy density distribution of the γ-ray emission with a plasma channel (top) and a uniform plasma slab (bottom). (b) and (c) show the angular energy distributions of the emitted γ rays in the plasma channel and uniform plasma, respectively.
    Fig. 3. (a) Energy spectra of γ rays at t=68T0. The insets show the energy density distribution of the γ-ray emission with a plasma channel (top) and a uniform plasma slab (bottom). (b) and (c) show the angular energy distributions of the emitted γ rays in the plasma channel and uniform plasma, respectively.
    (a) Energy spectra of positrons from a plasma channel (red curve) and a uniform plasma slab (black curve), where the inset shows the positron angular divergence. (b) Evolution of total yield and energy of positrons with the interaction time, where the solid curves are for a plasma channel and the dashed curves are for a uniform plasma slab. (c) and (d) show the energy density distributions of positrons generated from a plasma channel and from a uniform plasma slab, respectively. The insets present the density profiles of positrons in the x–y cross section.
    Fig. 4. (a) Energy spectra of positrons from a plasma channel (red curve) and a uniform plasma slab (black curve), where the inset shows the positron angular divergence. (b) Evolution of total yield and energy of positrons with the interaction time, where the solid curves are for a plasma channel and the dashed curves are for a uniform plasma slab. (c) and (d) show the energy density distributions of positrons generated from a plasma channel and from a uniform plasma slab, respectively. The insets present the density profiles of positrons in the x–y cross section.
    Yield Ne+, energy conversion efficiency ρe+, and cutoff energy Ee+ of positrons as functions of (a) laser amplitude a0 and (b) plasma channel length L.
    Fig. 5. Yield Ne+, energy conversion efficiency ρe+, and cutoff energy Ee+ of positrons as functions of (a) laser amplitude a0 and (b) plasma channel length L.
    Xing-Long Zhu, Min Chen, Tong-Pu Yu, Su-Ming Weng, Feng He, Zheng-Ming Sheng. Collimated GeV attosecond electron–positron bunches from a plasma channel driven by 10 PW lasers[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2019, 4(1): 014401
    Download Citation