• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 16, 161506 (2020)
Guoliang Yang, Dingling Yu*, and Zhendong Lai
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.161506 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Guoliang Yang, Dingling Yu, Zhendong Lai. Video Denoising and Object Detection Based on RPCA Model with l1-TV Regularization Constraints[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(16): 161506 Copy Citation Text show less
    Framework of proposed method
    Fig. 1. Framework of proposed method
    Gaussian noise detection results. (a)(b) Static background; (c)(d) dynamic background sequence; (e) turbulent environment sequence; (f) camera shake sequence; (g) high frame rate sequence
    Fig. 2. Gaussian noise detection results. (a)(b) Static background; (c)(d) dynamic background sequence; (e) turbulent environment sequence; (f) camera shake sequence; (g) high frame rate sequence
    Gaussian noise detection results with different variances.(a) 1969 frame and (b) 2000 frame in dynamic background; (c) 1689 frame and (d) 1969 frame in static background
    Fig. 3. Gaussian noise detection results with different variances.(a) 1969 frame and (b) 2000 frame in dynamic background; (c) 1689 frame and (d) 1969 frame in static background
    Algorithm 1:Video denoising and object detection based on RPCA model with l1-TV regularization constraints
    Input: Original Video V∈Rm×n×p, then add noise to the video to form a noisy video. Stack the noisy video frames to form O∈Rmn×p;Initialization: L0, S0, E0, F0, X0, Y0=0∈Rmn×p, k=0, μmax=1.25/‖YF, λ123>0,μ0=10-2,ρ=1.5;Output: Optimal solution(Fk, Kk)1. While not converged do2. Update Lk+1 via Eq. (12); Update Sk+1 via Eq. (15); Update Ek+1 via Eq. (17);3. Update Fk+1 via Eq. (23); Update Xk+1 via Eq. (24); Update Yk+1 via Eq. (25);4. Update μk+1=min(ρμk,μmax);5. K=K+1;6. Check the convergence condition:O-Lk-FkF2≤10-8OF2;7. End
    Table 1. Flow of proposed algorithm
    ImageDECOLORTVRPCAIBTLR l1 TVProposed
    PRFPRFPRFPRFPRF
    Fig. 2(a)0.320.540.440.830.570.690.650.510.570.460.700.630.730.890.80
    Fig. 2(b)0.840.450.590.790.450.570.500.630.560.720.800.760.880.720.79
    Fig. 2(c)0.900.510.650.900.830.860.630.650.640.460.600.510.900.860.88
    Fig. 2(d)0.700.690.690.820.510.660.620.310.540.730.870.800.700.930.85
    Fig. 2(e)0.220.650.320.780.710.750.720.800.760.730.860.790.830.870.85
    Fig. 2(f)0.850.530.680.820.780.800.530.270.360.750.850.800.890.940.91
    Fig.2(g)0.890.510.640.900.430.580.690.650.670.630.660.640.660.660.66
    Table 2. Measurement values of three indicators of different algorithms
    MethodFig. 2(a)Fig. 2(b)Fig. 2(c)Fig. 2(d)Fig. 2(e)Fig. 2(f)Fig. 2(g)
    Proposed20.0424.3129.9515.3018.2313.6718.19
    DECOLOR30.8329.1237.9025.9817.9823.9537.63
    IBT57.4448.6492.5687.6376.5489.6377.98
    TVRPCA55.2343.5663.7278.0363.8374.3876.93
    LRl1TV31.3221.4230.4324.7810.5120.6621.58
    Table 3. Comparison of running time of five algorithmss
    Guoliang Yang, Dingling Yu, Zhendong Lai. Video Denoising and Object Detection Based on RPCA Model with l1-TV Regularization Constraints[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(16): 161506
    Download Citation