• Matter and Radiation at Extremes
  • Vol. 7, Issue 1, 014401 (2022)
Ya-Nan Dai1, Bai-Fei Shen1、2, Jian-Xing Li3, Rashid Shaisultanov4、5, Karen Z. Hatsagortsyan4, Christoph H. Keitel4, and Yue-Yue Chen1、a)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics (SIOM), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shanghai 201800, China
  • 3School of Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
  • 4Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
  • 5Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1063/5.0063633 Cite this Article
    Ya-Nan Dai, Bai-Fei Shen, Jian-Xing Li, Rashid Shaisultanov, Karen Z. Hatsagortsyan, Christoph H. Keitel, Yue-Yue Chen. Photon polarization effects in polarized electron–positron pair production in a strong laser field[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2022, 7(1): 014401 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Photon emission probability log10 Wi (arbitrary units) and (b) Stokes parameter ξ3i (i ∈ ↑, ↓) vs emitted photon energy δe = ωγ/εi for χe = 10. i denotes the electron spin before the emission with respect to the magnetic field direction.
    Fig. 1. (a) Photon emission probability log10Wi (arbitrary units) and (b) Stokes parameter ξ3i (i ∈ ↑, ↓) vs emitted photon energy δe = ωγ/εi for χe = 10. i denotes the electron spin before the emission with respect to the magnetic field direction.
    (a) and (b) Pair production probability dWζ−ζ+ for a polarized photon with (a) ξ1 = ξ2 = 0, ξ3 = 1 and (b) ξ3 = −1. (c) Positron polarization ζ+=∑ζ−dWζ−↑−dWζ−↓dWζ−↑+dWζ−↓ vs ξ3 and δ+. In (a)–(c), χγ = 3. (d) Ratio of the photon-polarization-resolved and averaged pair production probabilities dWp(ξ)−dWp(0)dWp(ξ)+dWp(0) vs ξ3 and δ+. (e) ζ¯+=∑iζ+(δi)dWp(δi)∑idWp(δi) vs ξ3 for χγ = 0.1 (blue solid curve), 1 (red dashed curve), and 10 (magenta dotted curve). (f) Relative differences ΔN = [N(0) − N(ξ)]/N(ξ) (solid curve) and Δζy=[ζy+(0)−ζy+(ξ)]/ζy+(ξ) (dashed curve) vs χγ for ξ3 = 0.5.
    Fig. 2. (a) and (b) Pair production probability dWζζ+ for a polarized photon with (a) ξ1 = ξ2 = 0, ξ3 = 1 and (b) ξ3 = −1. (c) Positron polarization ζ+=ζdWζdWζdWζ+dWζ vs ξ3 and δ+. In (a)–(c), χγ = 3. (d) Ratio of the photon-polarization-resolved and averaged pair production probabilities dWp(ξ)dWp(0)dWp(ξ)+dWp(0) vs ξ3 and δ+. (e) ζ¯+=iζ+(δi)dWp(δi)idWp(δi) vs ξ3 for χγ = 0.1 (blue solid curve), 1 (red dashed curve), and 10 (magenta dotted curve). (f) Relative differences ΔN = [N(0) − N(ξ)]/N(ξ) (solid curve) and Δζy=[ζy+(0)ζy+(ξ)]/ζy+(ξ) (dashed curve) vs χγ for ξ3 = 0.5.
    Scheme for producing polarized positrons via nonlinear Compton scattering of an initially transversely polarized electron off a strong elliptically polarized laser pulse. The energetic gamma photons in the region θyγ<0 have high polarizations up to ξ3 = 1, resulting in a reduction in or even reversal of polarization of positrons as θy+ decreases.
    Fig. 3. Scheme for producing polarized positrons via nonlinear Compton scattering of an initially transversely polarized electron off a strong elliptically polarized laser pulse. The energetic gamma photons in the region θyγ<0 have high polarizations up to ξ3 = 1, resulting in a reduction in or even reversal of polarization of positrons as θy+ decreases.
    (a) Polarized positron density distribution d2N+/dθx+dθy+ (rad−2) and (b) averaged polarization degree of y component ζ̄y vs θx+=px/pz (rad) and θy+=py/pz (rad) for photon-polarization-unresolved pair production. (c) and (d) Corresponding plots for photon-polarization-resolved pair production. (e) Polarized positron density distribution dN/dθy (rad−1) vs θy+ (rad) for unresolved (solid curve) and resolved (dashed curve) photon polarization. (f) Averaged polarization degree ζ̄y vs θy+ (rad) for unresolved (solid curve) and resolved (dashed curve) photon polarization.
    Fig. 4. (a) Polarized positron density distribution d2N+/dθx+dθy+ (rad−2) and (b) averaged polarization degree of y component ζ̄y vs θx+=px/pz (rad) and θy+=py/pz (rad) for photon-polarization-unresolved pair production. (c) and (d) Corresponding plots for photon-polarization-resolved pair production. (e) Polarized positron density distribution dN/y (rad−1) vs θy+ (rad) for unresolved (solid curve) and resolved (dashed curve) photon polarization. (f) Averaged polarization degree ζ̄y vs θy+ (rad) for unresolved (solid curve) and resolved (dashed curve) photon polarization.
    (a) and (b) log10 dNγ/dωγ and averaged Stokes parameter ξ̄3, respectively, of gamma photons emitted in θyγ>0 (solid line) and θyγ<0 (dashed line) vs photon energy ωγ in |θx|, |θy| d2Nγ/dθxγdθyγ (rad−2) and ξ̄3, respectively, vs θxγ=kx/kz and θyγ=ky/kz. (e) and (f) Angular distributions of d2Nγ/dθxγdθyγ (rad−2) and ξ̄3, respectively, for photons with energy ε > 7.5 GeV [shaded red in (b)].
    Fig. 5. (a) and (b) log10dNγ/γ and averaged Stokes parameter ξ̄3, respectively, of gamma photons emitted in θyγ>0 (solid line) and θyγ<0 (dashed line) vs photon energy ωγ in |θx|, |θy| < 10 mrad. (c) and (d) Angular distributions of d2Nγ/dθxγdθyγ (rad−2) and ξ̄3, respectively, vs θxγ=kx/kz and θyγ=ky/kz. (e) and (f) Angular distributions of d2Nγ/dθxγdθyγ (rad−2) and ξ̄3, respectively, for photons with energy ε > 7.5 GeV [shaded red in (b)].
    (a) Polarized positron density distribution dN/dθy+ (rad−1) and (b) averaged polarization degree ζ̄y vs positron polar angle θy+ (rad) for positrons produced by photons with θyγ>0 (solid curves) and θyγ<0 (dashed curves).
    Fig. 6. (a) Polarized positron density distribution dN/dθy+ (rad−1) and (b) averaged polarization degree ζ̄y vs positron polar angle θy+ (rad) for positrons produced by photons with θyγ>0 (solid curves) and θyγ<0 (dashed curves).
    (a) and (b) log10 dNγ/dωγ and averaged Stokes parameter ξ̄3, respectively, of gamma photons emitted in θyγ>0 (solid curves) and θyγ<0 (dashed curves) vs photon energy ωγ in |θx|, |θy| dN/dθy (mrad−1) and averaged polarization degree ζ̄y, respectively, vs θy (mrad) for unresolved (dashed curves) and resolved (solid curves) photon polarization.
    Fig. 7. (a) and (b) log10dNγ/γ and averaged Stokes parameter ξ̄3, respectively, of gamma photons emitted in θyγ>0 (solid curves) and θyγ<0 (dashed curves) vs photon energy ωγ in |θx|, |θy| < 10 mrad. (c) and (d) Polarized positron density distribution dN/y (mrad−1) and averaged polarization degree ζ̄y, respectively, vs θy (mrad) for unresolved (dashed curves) and resolved (solid curves) photon polarization.
    (a) and (c) Positron number N+ in the case of unresolved photon polarization (dashed lines) and in the resolved case (solid lines) and their relative difference ΔN (dotted lines) vs laser intensity a0 (at a0 = 50, 100, and 150) and laser pulse duration tp (at tp = 3, 5, and 8 T), respectively. (b) and (d) Positron polarization ζ¯y in the case of unresolved photon polarization (dashed lines) and in the resolved case (solid lines) and their relative difference Δζ¯y (dotted lines) vs laser intensity a0 (at a0 = 50, 100, and 150) and laser pulse duration tp (at tp = 3, 5, and 8 T), respectively. Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 4.
    Fig. 8. (a) and (c) Positron number N+ in the case of unresolved photon polarization (dashed lines) and in the resolved case (solid lines) and their relative difference ΔN (dotted lines) vs laser intensity a0 (at a0 = 50, 100, and 150) and laser pulse duration tp (at tp = 3, 5, and 8 T), respectively. (b) and (d) Positron polarization ζ¯y in the case of unresolved photon polarization (dashed lines) and in the resolved case (solid lines) and their relative difference Δζ¯y (dotted lines) vs laser intensity a0 (at a0 = 50, 100, and 150) and laser pulse duration tp (at tp = 3, 5, and 8 T), respectively. Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 4.
    Ya-Nan Dai, Bai-Fei Shen, Jian-Xing Li, Rashid Shaisultanov, Karen Z. Hatsagortsyan, Christoph H. Keitel, Yue-Yue Chen. Photon polarization effects in polarized electron–positron pair production in a strong laser field[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2022, 7(1): 014401
    Download Citation