• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 51, Issue 4, 20210376 (2022)
Mingqi Pang1、2、3、4, Haizheng Liu2、3、4, Daijun Zhang2、3、4, and Zelin Shi1、2、3、4
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Automation, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Processing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
  • 3Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
  • 4Institutes for Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110169, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20210376 Cite this Article
    Mingqi Pang, Haizheng Liu, Daijun Zhang, Zelin Shi. A numerical study of carbon dioxide radiation and transmission property in high temperature shock layer[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(4): 20210376 Copy Citation Text show less
    Radiation transport in the shock layer
    Fig. 1. Radiation transport in the shock layer
    Radiation flux received by photosensitive surface of detector
    Fig. 2. Radiation flux received by photosensitive surface of detector
    Flow field simulation results in the shock layers at Ma=3, h=1 km. (a) Pressure; (b) Temperature; (c) Flow field approximation
    Fig. 3. Flow field simulation results in the shock layers at Ma=3, h=1 km. (a) Pressure; (b) Temperature; (c) Flow field approximation
    Flow field simulation results in the shock layers atMa=4, h=1 km. (a) Pressure; (b) Temperature; (c) Flow field approximation
    Fig. 4. Flow field simulation results in the shock layers atMa=4, h=1 km. (a) Pressure; (b) Temperature; (c) Flow field approximation
    Flow field simulation results in the shock layers atMa=5, h=1 km. (a) Pressure; (b) Temperature; (c) Flow field approximation
    Fig. 5. Flow field simulation results in the shock layers atMa=5, h=1 km. (a) Pressure; (b) Temperature; (c) Flow field approximation
    (a) 2.5-3 μm transmissibity; (b) 4.1-4.8 μm transmissibity; (c) 2.5-3 μm spectral radiance; (d) 4.1-4.8 μm spectral radiance; (e) 2.5-3 μm spectral radiant emittance; (f) 4.1-4.8 μm spectral radiant emittance of carbon dioxide in shock layer at h=1 km, Ma=3, 4, 5 respectively
    Fig. 6. (a) 2.5-3 μm transmissibity; (b) 4.1-4.8 μm transmissibity; (c) 2.5-3 μm spectral radiance; (d) 4.1-4.8 μm spectral radiance; (e) 2.5-3 μm spectral radiant emittance; (f) 4.1-4.8 μm spectral radiant emittance of carbon dioxide in shock layer at h=1 km, Ma=3, 4, 5 respectively
    Proportion of different radiation sources in mid-wave infrared
    Fig. 7. Proportion of different radiation sources in mid-wave infrared
    ConditionsProportionWavelength/μm
    4.2-4.44.4-4.6
    Ma=3 h=1 km `ηt0.120.72
    s0.860.17
    w0.020.11
    Ma=4 h=1 km t0.030.30
    s0.960.65
    w0.010.05
    Ma=5 h=1 km tsw0.02 0.98 0.00 0.06 0.92 0.02
    Table 1. Proportion of target, shock layers and window radiation in mid-wave band
    Mingqi Pang, Haizheng Liu, Daijun Zhang, Zelin Shi. A numerical study of carbon dioxide radiation and transmission property in high temperature shock layer[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(4): 20210376
    Download Citation