• Acta Physica Sinica
  • Vol. 69, Issue 5, 050701-1 (2020)
Zheng-Wei Zhang, Gui-Lin Wang*, Shao-Long Zhang, Qi-Zhi Sun, Wei Liu, Xiao-Ming Zhao, Yue-Song Jia, and Wei-Ping Xie
Author Affiliations
  • Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.7498/aps.69.20191690 Cite this Article
    Zheng-Wei Zhang, Gui-Lin Wang, Shao-Long Zhang, Qi-Zhi Sun, Wei Liu, Xiao-Ming Zhao, Yue-Song Jia, Wei-Ping Xie. Application of electrical action to design and analysis of magnetically driven solid liner implosion[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(5): 050701-1 Copy Citation Text show less
    The sketch for solid liner implosion.
    Fig. 1. The sketch for solid liner implosion.
    (a) The relationship between outer surface velocity and electrical action with various liner thicknesses; (b) the change of outer surface velocity with the liner thickness for initial outer radius R0 = 15.5 mm.
    Fig. 2. (a) The relationship between outer surface velocity and electrical action with various liner thicknesses; (b) the change of outer surface velocity with the liner thickness for initial outer radius R0 = 15.5 mm.
    Change of (a) the maximum momentum and (b) the maximum kinetic energy vs. thickness and electrical action.
    Fig. 3. Change of (a) the maximum momentum and (b) the maximum kinetic energy vs. thickness and electrical action.
    The optimal velocity and thickness of liner vs. initial outer radius.
    Fig. 4. The optimal velocity and thickness of liner vs. initial outer radius.
    (a) The configration of impact experiment liner; (b) the layout of PDV probe.
    Fig. 5. (a) The configration of impact experiment liner; (b) the layout of PDV probe.
    (a) The measurement velocity profile comparing with the calculated results; (b) the velocity profile of 1D-simulation and formula (3) via electrical action.
    Fig. 6. (a) The measurement velocity profile comparing with the calculated results; (b) the velocity profile of 1D-simulation and formula (3) via electrical action.
    The comparison of experiment and simulation: (a) The velocity profile; (b) the pressure and density profile.
    Fig. 7. The comparison of experiment and simulation: (a) The velocity profile; (b) the pressure and density profile.
    物态电作用量Q/1016A2·s·m–4
    Qmb2.52
    Qme3.20
    Qv4.86
    Qb6.58
    Table 1. Electrical action constants for aluminum
    材料电阻率η/μΩ·cm 密度ρ/g·cm–3爆炸电作用量Qb/1016A2·s·m–4(Qb/ρ)/1010A2·s·g–1·m–1
    铝(Aluminum)2.822.706.582.44
    铜(Copper)1.778.9517.301.93
    金(Gold)2.4419.308.300.43
    铀(Uranium)28.0018.703.500.19
    Table 2.

    The material constants for typical metals.

    典型金属的材料特性数据

    铝靶PI/GPa 铜靶PI/GPa 金靶PI/GPa 铀靶PI/GPa
    铝飞层(2.44 km/s)23.534.440.439.6
    铜飞层(1.93 km/s)26.146.460.459.3
    金飞层(0.43 km/s)5.510.31412.9
    铀飞层(0.19 km/s)2.24.05.34.8
    Table 3.

    The impact pressure of typical metals.

    典型金属的碰撞压力

    Zheng-Wei Zhang, Gui-Lin Wang, Shao-Long Zhang, Qi-Zhi Sun, Wei Liu, Xiao-Ming Zhao, Yue-Song Jia, Wei-Ping Xie. Application of electrical action to design and analysis of magnetically driven solid liner implosion[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(5): 050701-1
    Download Citation