• Opto-Electronic Advances
  • Vol. 6, Issue 11, 230094 (2023)
Mingrui Shao1, Chang Ji1, Jibing Tan1, Baoqiang Du1, Xiaofei Zhao1, Jing Yu1, Baoyuan Man1, Kaichen Xu2、*, Chao Zhang1、**, and Zhen Li1、***
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Materials and Clean Energy, School of Physics and Electronics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.29026/oea.2023.230094 Cite this Article
    Mingrui Shao, Chang Ji, Jibing Tan, Baoqiang Du, Xiaofei Zhao, Jing Yu, Baoyuan Man, Kaichen Xu, Chao Zhang, Zhen Li. Ferroelectrically modulate the Fermi level of graphene oxide to enhance SERS response[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2023, 6(11): 230094 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) SERS performance of Al2O3@GO, PMN-PT@GO (Ps+) and PMN-PT@GO(Ps−) by employing R6G as the probe molecule under excitation of 532 nm laser. (b) Raman shift of G band of GO in Al2O3@GO, PMN-PT@GO (Ps+) and PMN-PT@GO(Ps−). (c) UV-vis spectra of the GO and R6G/GO. (d-f) Schematic diagram of GO doping when adsorbed on different surfaces of PMN-PT. (g-i) Contact potential differences (VCPD) between Au probe and GO in (g) Al2O3@GO, (h) PMN-PT@GO (Ps+) and (i) PMN-PT@GO(Ps−) measured by a KPFM system. (j–l) Modulation mechanism of SERS enhancement of (j) Al2O3@GO, (k) PMN-PT@GO (Ps+) and (l) PMN-PT@GO(Ps−).
    Fig. 1. (a) SERS performance of Al2O3@GO, PMN-PT@GO (Ps+) and PMN-PT@GO(Ps) by employing R6G as the probe molecule under excitation of 532 nm laser. (b) Raman shift of G band of GO in Al2O3@GO, PMN-PT@GO (Ps+) and PMN-PT@GO(Ps). (c) UV-vis spectra of the GO and R6G/GO. (d-f) Schematic diagram of GO doping when adsorbed on different surfaces of PMN-PT. (g-i) Contact potential differences (VCPD) between Au probe and GO in (g) Al2O3@GO, (h) PMN-PT@GO (Ps+) and (i) PMN-PT@GO(Ps) measured by a KPFM system. (jl) Modulation mechanism of SERS enhancement of (j) Al2O3@GO, (k) PMN-PT@GO (Ps+) and (l) PMN-PT@GO(Ps).
    Atomic structure of (a) intrinsic graphene, (b) graphene on up-polarized (Ps+) PMN-PT surface, (c) graphene on down-polarized (Ps−) PMN-PT surface for DFT calculation. The electronic band structure of (d) intrinsic graphene, (e) graphene on up-polarized (Ps+) PMN-PT surface, (f) graphene on down-polarized (Ps−) PMN-PT surface.
    Fig. 2. Atomic structure of (a) intrinsic graphene, (b) graphene on up-polarized (Ps+) PMN-PT surface, (c) graphene on down-polarized (Ps) PMN-PT surface for DFT calculation. The electronic band structure of (d) intrinsic graphene, (e) graphene on up-polarized (Ps+) PMN-PT surface, (f) graphene on down-polarized (Ps) PMN-PT surface.
    (a, d) The temperature-dependent SERS spectra of R6G by employing (a) PMN-PT@GO(Ps−), (d) Al2O3@GO as a SERS substrate. (b) Schematic diagram of doping level of GO affected by PMN-PT@GO(Ps−) temperature. (c) Schematic illustration of the energy band structure of PMN-PT@GO(Ps−)/R6G and the electron transition process under 532 nm excitation laser. (e, f) SERS spectra of R6G with different concentrations on PMN-PT@GO(Ps−) at (e) 20 °C, (f) 0 °C. (g) SERS spectra of R6G with different concentrations on Al2O3@GO at different temperature.
    Fig. 3. (a, d) The temperature-dependent SERS spectra of R6G by employing (a) PMN-PT@GO(Ps), (d) Al2O3@GO as a SERS substrate. (b) Schematic diagram of doping level of GO affected by PMN-PT@GO(Ps) temperature. (c) Schematic illustration of the energy band structure of PMN-PT@GO(Ps)/R6G and the electron transition process under 532 nm excitation laser. (e, f) SERS spectra of R6G with different concentrations on PMN-PT@GO(Ps) at (e) 20 °C, (f) 0 °C. (g) SERS spectra of R6G with different concentrations on Al2O3@GO at different temperature.
    (a) SERS spectra of CV on PMN-PT@GO(Ps−) under excitation of 532 and 633 nm laser. (b) Schematic diagram of doping level of GO affected by PMN-PT@GO(Ps−) temperature. (c, d) Schematic illustration of the energy band structure of PMN-PT@GO(Ps−)/CV and the electron transition process under (c) 532 nm, (d) 633 nm excitation laser. (e, f) SERS spectra of CV on PMN-PT@GO(Ps−) under excitation of (e) 532 nm, (f) 633 nm laser at different temperature.
    Fig. 4. (a) SERS spectra of CV on PMN-PT@GO(Ps) under excitation of 532 and 633 nm laser. (b) Schematic diagram of doping level of GO affected by PMN-PT@GO(Ps) temperature. (c, d) Schematic illustration of the energy band structure of PMN-PT@GO(Ps)/CV and the electron transition process under (c) 532 nm, (d) 633 nm excitation laser. (e, f) SERS spectra of CV on PMN-PT@GO(Ps) under excitation of (e) 532 nm, (f) 633 nm laser at different temperature.
    (a, b) SERS spectra of PNTP on PMN-PT@GO(Ps−) under excitation of (a) 532 nm, (b) 633 nm laser at different temperature. (c) Schematic diagram of doping level of GO affected by PMN-PT@GO(Ps−) temperature. (d, e) Schematic illustration of the energy band structure of PMN-PT@GO(Ps−)/PNTP and the electron transition process under (d) 532 nm, (e) 633 nm excitation laser.
    Fig. 5. (a, b) SERS spectra of PNTP on PMN-PT@GO(Ps) under excitation of (a) 532 nm, (b) 633 nm laser at different temperature. (c) Schematic diagram of doping level of GO affected by PMN-PT@GO(Ps) temperature. (d, e) Schematic illustration of the energy band structure of PMN-PT@GO(Ps)/PNTP and the electron transition process under (d) 532 nm, (e) 633 nm excitation laser.
    Mingrui Shao, Chang Ji, Jibing Tan, Baoqiang Du, Xiaofei Zhao, Jing Yu, Baoyuan Man, Kaichen Xu, Chao Zhang, Zhen Li. Ferroelectrically modulate the Fermi level of graphene oxide to enhance SERS response[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2023, 6(11): 230094
    Download Citation