• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 21, 2128001 (2020)
Yongji Wang1, Yanfang Ming1、*, Tianchen Liang1, Xueying Zhou2, Chen Jia1, and Quan Wang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China
  • 2School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.2128001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yongji Wang, Yanfang Ming, Tianchen Liang, Xueying Zhou, Chen Jia, Quan Wang. GF-6 WFV Data Cloud Detection Based on Improved LCCD Algorithm[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(21): 2128001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Surface reflectance characteristics of non-spatiotemporal series. (a) Water; (b) wetland; (c) bareland; (d) impervious surface
    Fig. 1. Surface reflectance characteristics of non-spatiotemporal series. (a) Water; (b) wetland; (c) bareland; (d) impervious surface
    Surface reflectance characteristics of spatiotemporal series. (a) Forest; (b) grassland; (c) shrubland
    Fig. 2. Surface reflectance characteristics of spatiotemporal series. (a) Forest; (b) grassland; (c) shrubland
    Flow chart of cloud detection
    Fig. 3. Flow chart of cloud detection
    Cloud detection results above water. (a) Thick cloud; (b) broken cloud; (c) thin cloud
    Fig. 4. Cloud detection results above water. (a) Thick cloud; (b) broken cloud; (c) thin cloud
    Cloud detection results above vegetation. (a) Thick cloud; (b) thin cloud; (c) broken cloud
    Fig. 5. Cloud detection results above vegetation. (a) Thick cloud; (b) thin cloud; (c) broken cloud
    Cloud detection results above bright surfaces. (a) Thin cloud; (b) thick cloud; (c) broken cloud
    Fig. 6. Cloud detection results above bright surfaces. (a) Thin cloud; (b) thick cloud; (c) broken cloud
    Landsat8 cloud detection results above bright surfaces. (a) Broken cloud; (b) thick cloud; (c) thin cloud
    Fig. 7. Landsat8 cloud detection results above bright surfaces. (a) Broken cloud; (b) thick cloud; (c) thin cloud
    Accuracy index for each sample. (a) βCRT; (b) βCRC; (c) βCRS
    Fig. 8. Accuracy index for each sample. (a) βCRT; (b) βCRC; (c) βCRS
    Error rate index of each sample. (a) βCER; (b) βOER
    Fig. 9. Error rate index of each sample. (a) βCER; (b) βOER
    Band numberSpectral range /μmSpatial resolution /m
    B010.45-0.5216
    B020.52-0.5916
    B030.63-0.6916
    B040.77-0.8916
    B050.69-0.7316
    B060.73-0.7716
    B070.40-0.4516
    B080.59-0.6316
    Table 1. Introduction of GF-6 WFV data
    ParameterForestBarelandTropicalFrigid zoneTemperate zone
    SpringSummerAutumnWinter
    Ns/Nf0.1/0.90.3/0.70.6/0.40.1/0.90.4/0.60.9/0.1
    TB0.120.180.1260.1380.1560.1260.1440.174
    TG0.180.200.1820.1860.1920.1820.1880.198
    TR0.130.250.1420.1660.2020.1420.1780.238
    ParameterGrasslandBarelandTropicalFrigid zoneTemperate zone
    SpringSummerAutumnWinter
    Ns/Ng0.1/0.90.7/0.30.6/0.40.1/0.90.4/0.60.9/0.1
    TB0.200.180.1980.1860.1880.1980.1920.182
    TG0.230.200.2270.2090.2120.2270.2180.203
    TR0.300.250.2950.2650.2700.2950.2800.255
    ParameterShrublandBarelandTropicalFrigid zoneTemperate zone
    SpringSummerAutumnWinter
    Ns/Nb0.1/0.90.4/0.60.6/0.40.1/0.90.4/0.60.9/0.1
    TB0.160.180.1620.1680.1720.1620.1680.178
    TG0.180.200.1820.1880.1920.1820.1880.198
    Table 2. Thresholds of forests, grasslands and shrublands
    AccuracyVegetationWaterBright surfaceAverage
    βCRT /%96.3696.4394.0195.60
    βCRC /%93.0995.6088.7092.46
    βCRS /%97.3896.3596.6796.80
    βCER /%2.593.462.722.92
    βOER /%6.913.7710.797.16
    Table 3. Overall accuracy evaluation of cloud detection
    Yongji Wang, Yanfang Ming, Tianchen Liang, Xueying Zhou, Chen Jia, Quan Wang. GF-6 WFV Data Cloud Detection Based on Improved LCCD Algorithm[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(21): 2128001
    Download Citation