• Matter and Radiation at Extremes
  • Vol. 7, Issue 5, 055701 (2022)
Ke Lana)
Author Affiliations
  • Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094, China and HEDPS, Center for Applied Physics and Technology, and College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1063/5.0103362 Cite this Article
    Ke Lan. Dream fusion in octahedral spherical hohlraum[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2022, 7(5): 055701 Copy Citation Text show less
    Dream fusion in an octahedral spherical hohlraum. An octahedral hohlraum has six LEHs of the same size, with one at each pole and four along the equator, injected with lasers in an ideal arrangement. For the sake of illustration, as shown in Fig. 2, we number the LEHs centered on the positive and negative z axes (denoted by +z and −z) as I and VI, respectively, those on +x and −x as II and IV, respectively, and those on +y and −y as III and V, respectively. The laser beams are clustered in quads, characterized by the incidence angle θL formed with the respective LEH axis and the azimuthal angle ϕL around that axis. In the ideal laser arrangement, all LEHs have the same quad number NQ, all quads have the same θL ranging from 50° to 60°, and the quads of each LEH are aligned evenly in azimuth at ϕL = ϕL0 + k × 360°/NQ (k = 1, …, NQ) with 0° ϕL0 ϕLM and ϕLM = 360°/2NQ. Here, ϕL0 is the initial azimuthal angle deviating from +x and −x in the xy plane for LEH I and VI, respectively, from +y and −y in the yz plane for II and IV, respectively, and from +z and −z in the zx plane for III and V, respectively. Cylindrical LEHs are used to improve the laser beam propagation inside the spherical hohlraum. Also, the use of LEH shields can be considered, with the aim of decreasing radiation loss via the six LEHs and increasing the radiation asymmetry.
    Fig. 1. Dream fusion in an octahedral spherical hohlraum. An octahedral hohlraum has six LEHs of the same size, with one at each pole and four along the equator, injected with lasers in an ideal arrangement. For the sake of illustration, as shown in Fig. 2, we number the LEHs centered on the positive and negative z axes (denoted by +z and −z) as I and VI, respectively, those on +x and −x as II and IV, respectively, and those on +y and −y as III and V, respectively. The laser beams are clustered in quads, characterized by the incidence angle θL formed with the respective LEH axis and the azimuthal angle ϕL around that axis. In the ideal laser arrangement, all LEHs have the same quad number NQ, all quads have the same θL ranging from 50° to 60°, and the quads of each LEH are aligned evenly in azimuth at ϕL = ϕL0 + k × 360°/NQ (k = 1, …, NQ) with 0° < ϕL0 < ϕLM and ϕLM = 360°/2NQ. Here, ϕL0 is the initial azimuthal angle deviating from +x and −x in the xy plane for LEH I and VI, respectively, from +y and −y in the yz plane for II and IV, respectively, and from +z and −z in the zx plane for III and V, respectively. Cylindrical LEHs are used to improve the laser beam propagation inside the spherical hohlraum. Also, the use of LEH shields can be considered, with the aim of decreasing radiation loss via the six LEHs and increasing the radiation asymmetry.
    Elevation of octahedral spherical hohlraum with its characteristic regions of hot laser spots, cool re-emitting wall, and cooler closing LEHs (gray). The LEHs are numbered, and the laser spots are colored according to these numbers. In this model, there are 48 laser quads with θL = 55° and ϕL0 = 11.25°. The hohlraum radius is RH = 5.5 mm, the LEH radius is RLEH = 1 mm, and the radius of the focal laser waist at the LEH is RQ = 0.6 mm. LEH VI and the other 24 laser spots are on the opposite side.
    Fig. 2. Elevation of octahedral spherical hohlraum with its characteristic regions of hot laser spots, cool re-emitting wall, and cooler closing LEHs (gray). The LEHs are numbered, and the laser spots are colored according to these numbers. In this model, there are 48 laser quads with θL = 55° and ϕL0 = 11.25°. The hohlraum radius is RH = 5.5 mm, the LEH radius is RLEH = 1 mm, and the radius of the focal laser waist at the LEH is RQ = 0.6 mm. LEH VI and the other 24 laser spots are on the opposite side.
    AH/AC vs RH/RC for a cylindrical hohlraum (red line) and an octahedral hohlraum (blue line). Here, RH,cyl/RC (red numbers) and RH,oct/RC (blue numbers) are the hohlraum-to-capsule radius ratios of the cylindrical and octahedral hohlraums, respectively. The length-to-diameter ratio of the cylindrical hohlraum is taken as 1.75.
    Fig. 3. AH/AC vs RH/RC for a cylindrical hohlraum (red line) and an octahedral hohlraum (blue line). Here, RH,cyl/RC (red numbers) and RH,oct/RC (blue numbers) are the hohlraum-to-capsule radius ratios of the cylindrical and octahedral hohlraums, respectively. The length-to-diameter ratio of the cylindrical hohlraum is taken as 1.75.
    Variations of Clm (symbol) and ηLoss (dashed line, connected with the light green curve) with number of LEHs for spherical hohlraum of radius RH = 4RC (upper) and RH = 5RC (lower). Here, ηLoss is the energy loss efficiency via LEHs, defined as ηLoss = AL/[(1 − αW)AW + (1 − αC)AC + AL]. We take RL/RC = 1.732 for the 2-LEH spherical hohlraum, RL/RC = 1.22 for the 4-LEH hohlraum, and RL/RC = 1 for the 6-, 8-, 12-, and 20-LEH hohlraums. Thus, we take the same AL for the spherical hohlraums with six and fewer LEHs, but the same RL for the spherical hohlraums with six and more LEHs. Note that we take larger LEHs for the spherical hohlraums with two and four LEHs, because they both need lasers at multiple incident angles for symmetry tuning. A 4-LEH spherical hohlraum is usually called a tetrahedral hohlraum.29,56,85,86 With the same AL, ηLoss is the same for the 2-, 4-, and 6-LEH hohlraums. For the hohlraums with more than six LEHs, ηLoss increases with increasing number of LEHs. The dominant Clm’s of the spherical hohlraums with different numbers of LEHs are indicated on the figure and connected by the magenta curve. C2m appears only for the 2-LEH hohlraum, and C3m appears only for the 4-LEH hohlraum. For RH = 4RC, both 6- and 8-LEH spherical hohlraums are dominated by C40 ∼ 3.5 × 10−3, but the 8-LEH has a remarkable higher ηLoss. For RH = 5RC, the 6-LEH spherical hohlraum is at its golden hohlraum-to-capsule radius ratio, dominated by C80 ∼ 1.1 × 10−4, and its asymmetry is the lowest among all these hohlraums.
    Fig. 4. Variations of Clm (symbol) and ηLoss (dashed line, connected with the light green curve) with number of LEHs for spherical hohlraum of radius RH = 4RC (upper) and RH = 5RC (lower). Here, ηLoss is the energy loss efficiency via LEHs, defined as ηLoss = AL/[(1 − αW)AW + (1 − αC)AC + AL]. We take RL/RC = 1.732 for the 2-LEH spherical hohlraum, RL/RC = 1.22 for the 4-LEH hohlraum, and RL/RC = 1 for the 6-, 8-, 12-, and 20-LEH hohlraums. Thus, we take the same AL for the spherical hohlraums with six and fewer LEHs, but the same RL for the spherical hohlraums with six and more LEHs. Note that we take larger LEHs for the spherical hohlraums with two and four LEHs, because they both need lasers at multiple incident angles for symmetry tuning. A 4-LEH spherical hohlraum is usually called a tetrahedral hohlraum.29,56,85,86 With the same AL, ηLoss is the same for the 2-, 4-, and 6-LEH hohlraums. For the hohlraums with more than six LEHs, ηLoss increases with increasing number of LEHs. The dominant Clm’s of the spherical hohlraums with different numbers of LEHs are indicated on the figure and connected by the magenta curve. C2m appears only for the 2-LEH hohlraum, and C3m appears only for the 4-LEH hohlraum. For RH = 4RC, both 6- and 8-LEH spherical hohlraums are dominated by C40 ∼ 3.5 × 10−3, but the 8-LEH has a remarkable higher ηLoss. For RH = 5RC, the 6-LEH spherical hohlraum is at its golden hohlraum-to-capsule radius ratio, dominated by C80 ∼ 1.1 × 10−4, and its asymmetry is the lowest among all these hohlraums.
    Design island (surrounded by gray and black regions) of an octahedral spherical hohlraum in the plane of RH/RC and RL/RC. In the blue region, C40 ≤ 0.1%. The golden line corresponds to the golden radius ratio RH/RC ∼ 5 with C4m = 0. Outside the design island, C40 > 0.8% at t = 0 (dark gray region), C40 > 0.8% at RC*/RC = 0.25 (black region), ηHC RL/RC < 0.8 (transparent gray region).
    Fig. 5. Design island (surrounded by gray and black regions) of an octahedral spherical hohlraum in the plane of RH/RC and RL/RC. In the blue region, C40 ≤ 0.1%. The golden line corresponds to the golden radius ratio RH/RC ∼ 5 with C4m = 0. Outside the design island, C40 > 0.8% at t = 0 (dark gray region), C40 > 0.8% at RC*/RC = 0.25 (black region), ηHC < 10% (light gray region), and RL/RC < 0.8 (transparent gray region).
    Ke Lan. Dream fusion in octahedral spherical hohlraum[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2022, 7(5): 055701
    Download Citation