• Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
  • Vol. 41, Issue 2, 618 (2021)
Tan-ping LI* and Ai-yang LI
Author Affiliations
  • New Building Materials Academy, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang 421002, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2021)02-0618-06 Cite this Article
    Tan-ping LI, Ai-yang LI. Analysis of Ultra-Trace Metal Impurity Elements in Proprylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Tandem Mass Spectrometry[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(2): 618 Copy Citation Text show less
    Optimization of the NH3/He reaction gas flow rate(a): On-mass method; (b): Mass shift method
    Fig. 1. Optimization of the NH3/He reaction gas flow rate
    (a): On-mass method; (b): Mass shift method
    ParameterSetting
    RF power/W1 550
    Carrier gas flow/(L·min-1)1.05
    Make up gas flow/(L·min-1)0.25
    Sampling depth/mm8
    Cell gasNH3/He/H2(10% NH3 in He)
    Cell gas flow rate/(mL·min-1)NH3/He: 2.8; H2=2.0
    ORS bias voltage/V-18
    KED voltage/V-8
    Table 1. ICP-MS/MS operating parameters
    IsotopePotential interferencesBEC/(ng·L-1)
    SQ modeMS/MS mode
    no gasHeNH3/HeNH3/He/H2
    24Mg12C2, 23Na1H, 7Li17O, 48Ti++, 48Ca++2 97041129.831.2
    27Al12C15N, 12C14NH86020277.375.4
    39K38ArH, 23Na16O189 00065 30012684.3
    48Ti32S16O, 34S14N, 33S15N, 14N16O18O, 36Ar12C1 56087.421.016.7
    51V35Cl16O, 36Ar14NH, 34Ar16OH, 36Ar13C, 36Ar15N47915.38.165.04
    52Cr40Ar12C, 35Cl16OH, 36Ar16O, 38Ar14N, 36Ar15N1H2 17073.641.435.8
    56Fe40Ar16O, 40Ca16O, 40Ar15N1H, 38Ar18O, 112Cd++1 81042512294.1
    60Ni23Na36ArH, 23Na37Cl, 44Ca16O, 59CoH31649.721.817.6
    63Cu23Na40Ar, 23Na40Ca, 12C16O35Cl, 12C14N37Cl, 46Ca16OH17751.340.534.4
    66Zn34S16O2, 48Ti18O, 48Ca18O, 32S17O2, 33S17O16O, 32S34S22314811689.5
    Table 2. Background equivalent concentrations (BEC) of analytes in different analysis modes
    AnalyteInterferenceRecovery/%
    Added interferentInterfering ionNo gas modeNH3/He/H2 reaction mode
    24MgC (Ethanol)12C2+307101.3
    27AlC (Ethanol)12C15N+, 12C14NH+22399.1
    39K/38ArH+85198.6
    48TiS (SO42-)32S16O+, 34S14N+1 260102.5
    51VCl (Cl-)35Cl16O+208100.7
    52CrC (Euhanol)40Ar12C+715101.6
    56Fe/40Ar16O+1 07097.5
    60NiNa (Na+)23Na36ArH+32299.1
    63CuNa (Na+)23Na40Ar+450103.4
    66ZnS (SO42-)34S16O2+, 32S17O2+27998.9
    Table 3. Recovery of interference removal experiment in different modes
    ElementLinear range
    /(μg·L-1)
    Coefficient
    (r)
    LOD
    /(ng·L-1)
    ElementLinear range
    /(μg·L-1)
    Coefficient
    (r)
    LOD
    /(ng·L-1)
    Mg0~1000.999 915.1Cr0~1001.000 02.18
    Al0~1001.000 017.2Fe0~1000.999 835.3
    K0~1000.999 861.5Ni0~1001.000 09.75
    Ti0~1000.999 73.84Cu0~1000.999 95.81
    V0~1001.000 00.52Zn0~1000.999 840.6
    Table 4. Calibration data and instrumental limits of detection (LOD)
    ElementSpiked
    /(μg·L-1)
    Found by ICP-MS/MS
    /(μg·L-1)
    RSD
    /%
    Recovery
    /%
    Found by SF-ICP-MS
    /(μg·L-1)
    t test
    Mg5.005.12±0.234.5102.45.08±0.19p=0.37
    Al5.004.91±0.112.298.24.85±0.12p=0.15
    K5.004.88±0.102.097.64.94±0.15p=0.21
    Ti5.005.09±0.152.9101.85.16±0.21p=0.26
    V5.005.17±0.193.7103.45.05±0.24p=0.18
    Cr5.004.83±0.142.996.64.74±0.18p=0.11
    Fe5.005.21±0.203.8104.25.13±0.16p=0.23
    Ni5.004.78±0.081.795.64.82±0.12p=0.26
    Cu5.004.81±0.214.496.24.85±0.09p=0.33
    Zn5.005.19±0.142.7103.85.07±0.10p=0.06
    Table 5. The accuracy and precisions of method (n=6)
    ElementSample 1Sample 2Sample 3
    ICP-MS/MSSF-ICP-MSICP-MS/MSSF-ICP-MSICP-MS/MSSF-ICP-MS
    Mg2.56±0.032.34±0.041.87±0.031.92±0.022.15±0.042.20±0.05
    Al1.36±0.021.41±0.022.05±0.022.09±0.033.61±0.053.53±0.04
    K2.23±0.012.19±0.034.59±0.054.66±0.081.20±0.021.31±0.05
    Ti2.80±0.053.01±0.071.50±0/021.43±0.031.97±0.031.83±0.03
    V1.62±0.031.57±0.020.75±0.010.79±0.011.84±0.051.68±0.02
    Cr0.93±0.011.04±0.032.40±0.032.31±0.022.75±0.032.82±0.03
    Fe5.10±0.125.23±0.103.65±0.053.71±0.048.06±0.137.82±0.16
    Ni1.66±0.021.74±0.030.69±0.010.64±0.011.73±0.041.81±0.04
    Cu4.77±0.084.92±0.092.87±0.042.82±0.063.21±0.033.39±0.05
    Zn3.45±0.043.36±0.051.21±0.011.16±0.022.27±0.022.32±0.02
    Table 6. Analytical results for determination of 10 ultra-trace metal elements in PGME (ng·g-1, n=6)
    Tan-ping LI, Ai-yang LI. Analysis of Ultra-Trace Metal Impurity Elements in Proprylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Tandem Mass Spectrometry[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(2): 618
    Download Citation