• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 51, Issue 5, 20210916 (2022)
Heli Wei1、2, Congming Dai1、2, Pengfei Wu1、2, Jianyu Li1、2, Fengying Sun1、2, Chaoli Tang3, Honghua Huang1、2, Xuebin Li1、2, Wenyue Zhu1、2, Ruizhong Rao1、2, and Yingjian Wang1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Optics, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
  • 2Advanced Laser Technology Laboratory of Anhui Province, Hefei 230037, China
  • 3Institute of Electrical and Information Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20210916 Cite this Article
    Heli Wei, Congming Dai, Pengfei Wu, Jianyu Li, Fengying Sun, Chaoli Tang, Honghua Huang, Xuebin Li, Wenyue Zhu, Ruizhong Rao, Yingjian Wang. Applications of scene calculations of atmopsheric radiative transfer by using of CART (Invited)[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(5): 20210916 Copy Citation Text show less
    Mie phase function and Lengdre extension with different Nstr=4,8,16,32,64. (a) Particle mean radius=0.5 μm; (b) Particle mean radius=1.0 μm
    Fig. 1. Mie phase function and Lengdre extension with different Nstr=4,8,16,32,64. (a) Particle mean radius=0.5 μm; (b) Particle mean radius=1.0 μm
    Sky radiance calculated using CART with the different Nstr of 4, 8, 16, and 32
    Fig. 2. Sky radiance calculated using CART with the different Nstr of 4, 8, 16, and 32
    Comparisons of Lengdre extension with different Nstr(4,8,16,32,64) and the H-G phase function. (a) g=0.8; (b) g=0.95
    Fig. 3. Comparisons of Lengdre extension with different Nstr(4,8,16,32,64) and the H-G phase function. (a) g=0.8; (b) g=0.95
    Aerosol scattered sky radiance calculated by using of CART with the Nstr of 4, 8, 16, and 32 for the case of H-G phase fucntion with g=0.95
    Fig. 4. Aerosol scattered sky radiance calculated by using of CART with the Nstr of 4, 8, 16, and 32 for the case of H-G phase fucntion with g=0.95
    Relationship between the time-consuming of CART multiple scattering calculation and the Nstr of Lengendre extension
    Fig. 5. Relationship between the time-consuming of CART multiple scattering calculation and the Nstr of Lengendre extension
    Comparisons of atmospheric thermal radiation vs. zenith angle and target altitude between CART calculations and fittings
    Fig. 6. Comparisons of atmospheric thermal radiation vs. zenith angle and target altitude between CART calculations and fittings
    Scene atmospheric thermal radiation vs. zenith angle and target altitude calcaulted with CART
    Fig. 7. Scene atmospheric thermal radiation vs. zenith angle and target altitude calcaulted with CART
    Comparisons of atmospheric average transmittance vs. zenith angle and target altitude between CART calculations and fittings
    Fig. 8. Comparisons of atmospheric average transmittance vs. zenith angle and target altitude between CART calculations and fittings
    Scene atmospheric transmittance vs. zenith angle and target altitude calcaulted with CART
    Fig. 9. Scene atmospheric transmittance vs. zenith angle and target altitude calcaulted with CART
    Heli Wei, Congming Dai, Pengfei Wu, Jianyu Li, Fengying Sun, Chaoli Tang, Honghua Huang, Xuebin Li, Wenyue Zhu, Ruizhong Rao, Yingjian Wang. Applications of scene calculations of atmopsheric radiative transfer by using of CART (Invited)[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(5): 20210916
    Download Citation