• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 9, 0917001 (2021)
Guang Han1、3, Jingjing Gao1, Mengru Tu1, Jia Shi2、3, Zhenhua Pan4, and Hongli Chen1、3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Life Sciences, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China
  • 2School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China
  • 3Tianjin Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Detection Technology and Systems, Tianjin 300387, China
  • 4Institute of Lung Cancer, General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0917001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Guang Han, Jingjing Gao, Mengru Tu, Jia Shi, Zhenhua Pan, Hongli Chen. Effect of Photobiomodulation Mediated by 808 nm Laser on Active Oxygen Steady-State in CCC-ESFs under High Glucose Environment[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(9): 0917001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Cell morphology observation results. (a) Normal medium; (b) high glucose medium
    Fig. 1. Cell morphology observation results. (a) Normal medium; (b) high glucose medium
    Absorbance of CCC-ESFs irradiated by 808 nm laser with different power densities (n=3;* means p<0.05, compared with high glucose control group)
    Fig. 2. Absorbance of CCC-ESFs irradiated by 808 nm laser with different power densities (n=3;* means p<0.05, compared with high glucose control group)
    Absorbance of CCC-ESFs irradiated by 808 nm laser with different energy densities (n=3; * means pp<0.01, compared with high glucose control group)
    Fig. 3. Absorbance of CCC-ESFs irradiated by 808 nm laser with different energy densities (n=3; * means p<0.05, compared with high glucose control group;** means p<0.01, compared with high glucose control group)
    Intracellular ROS level (n=3; * means pp pp<0.01, compared with high glucose control group)
    Fig. 4. Intracellular ROS level (n=3; * means p<0.05, compared with normal glucose control group; ** means p<0.01, compared with normal glucose control group; # means p<0.05, compared with high glucose control group; ## means p<0.01, compared with high glucose control group)
    Total intracellular SOD level (n=3; * means pp p<0.05, compared with high glucose control group)
    Fig. 5. Total intracellular SOD level (n=3; * means p<0.05, compared with normal glucose control group; ** means p<0.01, compared with normal glucose control group; # means p<0.05, compared with high glucose control group)
    TAC level of cells (n=3; * means pp pp<0.01, compared with high glucose control group)
    Fig. 6. TAC level of cells (n=3; * means p<0.05, compared with normal glucose control group; ** means p<0.01, compared with normal glucose control group; # means p<0.05, compared with high glucose control group; ## means p<0.01, compared with high glucose control group)
    Intracellular mitochondrial membrane potential level
    Fig. 7. Intracellular mitochondrial membrane potential level
    ParameterValue
    Wavelength /nm808
    Output modeContinuous
    Average radiant power /mW40
    Spot area /cm22
    Vertical distance /cm4
    Beam profileRound
    Beam divergence angle /(°)90
    Table 1. Irradiation parameters
    Power density /(mW·cm-2)Energy density /(J·cm-2)Irradiation time /min
    101.52.5
    35
    610
    1220
    201.51.25
    32.5
    65
    1210
    401.50.625
    31.25
    62.5
    125
    Table 2. Laser irradiation dose
    ItemNF-κB level /(pg·mL-1TNF-α level /(pg·mL-1IL-1β level /(pg·mL-1
    A450Standard deviationA450Standard deviationA450Standard deviation
    Control-HG1066.22±6.8174.11±0.5571.33±0.55
    Control-NG1171.22±10.86*78.23±0.37*74.92±0.15**
    3 J·cm-2-HG1061.22±66.3575.72±2.26**66.48±0.79**
    3 J·cm-2-NG1111.22±36.8##74.45±0.96#69.72±1.16##
    Table 3. NF-κB, TNF-α and IL-1β levels of cells irradiated by 808 nm laser
    Guang Han, Jingjing Gao, Mengru Tu, Jia Shi, Zhenhua Pan, Hongli Chen. Effect of Photobiomodulation Mediated by 808 nm Laser on Active Oxygen Steady-State in CCC-ESFs under High Glucose Environment[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(9): 0917001
    Download Citation