Fig. 1. Schematic of triangulation interpolation
Fig. 2. Original images. (a) GF-2 panchromatic image; (b) GF-2 multispectral image; (c) Superview-1 panchromatic image; (d) Superview-1 multispectral image
Fig. 3. GF-2 images after dehazing process. (a) Haze image in blue spectral band; (b) image of bright object in red spectral band; (c) dark channel image; (d) non-dark channel image
Fig. 4. Superview-1 images after dehazing process. (a) Haze image in blue spectral band; (b) image of bright object in red spectral band; (c) dark channel image; (d) non-dark channel image
Fig. 5. GF-2 images before and after dehazing processing. (a) Original panchromatic image; (b) panchromatic image after processing by Makarau's method; (c) panchromatic image after processing by proposed method; (d) original multispectral true color image; (e) true color image after processing by Makarau's method; (f) true color image after processing by proposed method
Fig. 6. Superview-1 images before and after dehazing processing. (a) Original panchromatic image; (b) panchromatic image after processing by Makarau's method; (c) panchromatic image after processing by proposed method; (d) original multispectral true color image; (e) true color image after processing by Makarau's method; (f) true color image after processing by proposed method
Fig. 7. Comparison histogram of GF-2 image quality parameters before and after dehazing processing. (a) Average gray-scale gradient; (b) edge energy; (c) contrast; (d) sharpness
Fig. 8. Comparison histogram of Superview-1 image quality parameters before and after dehazing processing. (a) Average gray-scale gradient; (b) edge energy; (c) contrast; (d) sharpness
Fig. 9. Schematics of color of local bright object before and after dehazing processing. (a) Original image; (b) image processed by Makarau's method; (c) image processed by proposed method
Fig. 10. Dehazing processing of whole scene image. (a) Original image and some details; (b) dehazing image and some details
Satellite | Launching time | GSD /m | Band range /μm |
---|
| | PAN: 0.8; | PAN: 0.45-0.90; | GF-2 | 2014-08-19 | MS: 3.2 | B1: 0.45-0.52; | | | | B2: 0.52-0.59; | | | | B3: 0.63-0.69; | | | | B4: 0.77-0.89 | | | PAN: 0.5; | PAN: 0.45-0.90; | Superview-1 | 2016-12-26 | MS: 2.0 | B1: 0.45-0.52; | | | | B2: 0.52-0.59; | | | | B3: 0.63-0.69; | | | | B4: 0.77-0.89 |
|
Table 1. Satellite parameters
Image quality parameter | Original image | Image processed by Makarau's method | Image processed by proposed method |
---|
Average gray-scale gradient | 0.4611 | 0.7480 | 1.0000 | Edge energy | 0.8397 | 0.9517 | 1.0000 | Contrast | 0.7933 | 0.9477 | 1.0000 | Sharpness | 0.4446 | 0.8882 | 1.0000 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of quality parameters of GF-2 panchromatic images before and after dehazing processing
Image quality parameter | Original image | Image processed by Makarau's method | Image processed by proposed method |
---|
Average gray-scale gradient | B1: 0.3393;B2: 0.3754;B3: 0.2580 | B1: 0.7621;B2: 0.9283;B3: 0.7554 | B1: 1.0000;B2: 1.0000;B3: 1.0000 | Edge energy | B1: 0.9398;B2: 0.9810;B3: 0.9702 | B1: 0.9709;B2: 0.9873;B3: 0.9893 | B1: 1.0000;B2: 1.0000;B3: 1.0000 | Contrast | B1: 0.5625;B2: 0.5535;B3: 0.7573 | B1: 0.8493;B2: 0.8812;B3: 0.9058 | B1: 1.0000;B2: 1.0000;B3: 1.0000 | Sharpness | B1: 0.6346;B2: 0.7083;B3: 0.4557 | B1: 0.8792;B2: 0.9102;B3: 0.7776 | B1: 1.0000;B2: 1.0000;B3: 1.0000 |
|
Table 3. Comparison of quality parameters of GF-2 multispectral images before and after dehazing processing
Image quality parameter | Original image | Image processed by Makarau's method | Image processed by proposed method |
---|
Average gray-scale gradient | 0.6526 | 0.8190 | 1.0000 | Edge energy | 0.9620 | 0.9871 | 1.0000 | Contrast | 0.8854 | 0.9383 | 1.0000 | Sharpness | 0.8040 | 0.9234 | 1.0000 |
|
Table 4. Comparison of quality parameters of Superview-1 panchromatic images before and after dehazing processing
Image quality parameter | Original image | Image processed by Makarau's method | Image processed by proposed method |
---|
Average gray-scale gradient | B1: 0.5377;B2: 0.5766;B3: 0.6233 | B1: 0.8528;B2: 0.8929;B3: 0.8547 | B1: 1.0000;B2: 1.0000;B3: 1.0000 | Edge energy | B1: 0.9435;B2: 0.9624;B3: 0.9773 | B1: 0.9772;B2: 0.9839;B3: 0.9959 | B1: 1.0000;B2: 1.0000;B3: 1.0000 | Contrast | B1: 0.4369;B2: 0.6321;B3: 0.7657 | B1: 0.8645;B2: 0.9115;B3: 0.9198 | B1: 1.0000;B2: 1.0000;B3: 1.0000 | Sharpness | B1: 0.7961;B2: 0.8046;B3: 0.8025 | B1: 0.9228;B2: 0.9388;B3: 0.9387 | B1: 1.0000;B2: 1.0000;B3: 1.0000 |
|
Table 5. Comparison of quality parameters of Superview-1 multispectral spectral images before and after dehazing processing