Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Measurement and Control and Optical Information Transmission Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Electro-Optical Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130013, Jilin , China2Unit 63850 of the People's Liberation Army, Baicheng 137001, Jilin , Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Coordinate systems and imaging model. (a) Relation among three coordinate systems; (b) pinhole imaging model
Fig. 2. T-type photoelectric theodolite imaging model. (a) Positive image; (b) inverted image
Fig. 3. T-type photoelectric theodolite for pole vertex imaging diagram. (a) Positive image; (b) reversed image
Fig. 4. Flow chart of proposed overall algorithm
Fig. 5. Performance with noise level on detection accuracy. (a) tz, ty; (b) g, h, cx, cy
Fig. 6. Performance with tx on detection accuracy. (a) tz, ty; (b) g, h, cx, cy
Fig. 7. Performance with near station pole distance on detection accuracy. (a) tz, ty; (b) g, h, cx, cy
Fig. 8. Picture of T-type photoelectric theodolite
Fig. 9. Captured images of station poles. (a) Near station pole under positive image; (b) near station pole under reversed image; (c) far station pole under positive image; (d) far station pole under reversed image
Fig. 10. Reprojection error distribution. (a) Before optimization; (b) after optimization
Parameter | ty /m | tz /m | g /(°) | cx /(°) | h /(°) | cy /(°) |
---|
Linear computed value | 0.0145 | 0.1450 | 0.3765 | 0.2765 | 0.0191 | 0.0346 | Optimized value | 0.0143 | 0.1444 | 0.3771 | 0.2756 | 0.0183 | 0.0351 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of linear calculation values and optimized values