Fig. 1. Spatial relation between PCS and absolute phase map
Fig. 2. Coordinate transformation relation. (a) Fringe projection 3D measurement system; (b) detailed coordinate transformation process
Fig. 3. Experimental setup
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of calibration procedure
Fig. 5. Calibration evaluation. 3D reconstruction result of the feature points while (a) n=3, (c) n=4; error distribution of the feature points while (b) n=3, (d) n=4
Fig. 6. Calibration target
Fig. 7. Distance error distribution. (a) Line AD; (b) line BC
Fig. 8. Fitting planes. (a) Proposed method; (b) 4th-PMM; (c) CPHCM
Fig. 9. 3D shape measurement results of a sculpture and a hand. (a),(b) Fringe patterns; (c),(d) absolute phase map; (e),(f) 3D reconstruction results obtained by proposed method; (g),(h) 3D reconstruction results obtained by 4th-PMM model; (i),(j) 3D reconstruction results obtained by CPHCM model
Position | Proposed method | 4th-PMM | CPHCM |
---|
RMS error | Distance error | RMS error | Distance error | RMS error | Distance error |
---|
1 | 0.027 | 0.032 | 0.032 | -0.038 | 0.042 | 0.034 | 2 | 0.026 | 0.046 | 0.035 | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0.048 | 3 | 0.028 | 0.028 | 0.037 | 0.039 | 0.041 | 0.030 | 4 | 0.027 | 0.020 | 0.036 | 0.050 | 0.041 | 0.047 | 5 | 0.026 | 0.012 | 0.037 | 0.061 | 0.037 | 0.041 | 6 | 0.026 | -0.001 | 0.038 | 0.011 | 0.036 | 0.005 | 7 | 0.026 | -0.033 | 0.039 | -0.053 | 0.043 | 0.055 | 8 | 0.025 | - | 0.035 | - | 0.035 | - |
|
Table 1. Fitting results evaluationmm