• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 22, 2212004 (2020)
Yingfu Guo1, Weiming Quan1, Wenyun Wang2、*, Hao Zhou1, and Longzhou Zou1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Electromechanic Engineering College, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
  • 2Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Health Maintenance for Mechanical Equipment, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.2212004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yingfu Guo, Weiming Quan, Wenyun Wang, Hao Zhou, Longzhou Zou. Crack Diagnosis Method of Wind Turbine Blade Based on Convolution Neural Network with 3D Vibration Information Fusion[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(22): 2212004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Binocular stereo imaging model
    Fig. 1. Binocular stereo imaging model
    Flow chart for making samples
    Fig. 2. Flow chart for making samples
    Improved CNN model
    Fig. 3. Improved CNN model
    Photogrammetry experiment chart. (a) Binocular high-speed camera measuring instrument; (b) wind turbine blade; (c) labels for different cracks; (d) code identification map
    Fig. 4. Photogrammetry experiment chart. (a) Binocular high-speed camera measuring instrument; (b) wind turbine blade; (c) labels for different cracks; (d) code identification map
    Vibration displacement curves of No.5 coded marker. (a) X direction; (b) Y direction; (c) Z direction
    Fig. 5. Vibration displacement curves of No.5 coded marker. (a) X direction; (b) Y direction; (c) Z direction
    Image samples. (a) YPA; (b) YPB; (c) YPC; (d) YPD; (e) YPE; (f) YPF; (g) YPG; (h) YPH
    Fig. 6. Image samples. (a) YPA; (b) YPB; (c) YPC; (d) YPD; (e) YPE; (f) YPF; (g) YPG; (h) YPH
    Image samples. (a) YPA; (b) YPB; (c) YPC; (d) YPD; (e) YPE; (f) YPF; (g) YPG; (h) YPH
    Fig. 7. Image samples. (a) YPA; (b) YPB; (c) YPC; (d) YPD; (e) YPE; (f) YPF; (g) YPG; (h) YPH
    Train accuracy. (a) Experiment 1; (b) experiment 2; (c) experiment 3
    Fig. 8. Train accuracy. (a) Experiment 1; (b) experiment 2; (c) experiment 3
    Confusion matrix for experiment 1. (a) Method 1; (b) method 2; (c) method 7
    Fig. 9. Confusion matrix for experiment 1. (a) Method 1; (b) method 2; (c) method 7
    LayerKernel or filter size, output channelOutput size
    Convolution1×1, 24294×294×24
    Convolution11×11, 2459×59×24
    Max pooling3×3, 2430×30×24
    Convolution5×5, 6430×30×64
    Max pooling3×3, 6415×15×64
    Convolution3×3, 6415×15×96
    Convolution3×3, 9615×15×96
    Convolution3×3, 9615×15×64
    Max pooling2×2, 648×8×64
    Fully connected,dropout512, 0.564
    Fully connected,dropout512, 0.564
    Fully connected, SoftMax88
    Table 1. Structural parameters of the proposed CNN model
    MethodMean accuracy /%Training time /s
    CNN (unfusion-signal)76.62323.45
    CNN (fusion-signal)89.54327.82
    LeNet-5 (fusion-signal)89.16423.59
    VGG11 (fusion-signal)92.271162.19
    Proposed-CNN (fusion-signal_A)93.24548.27
    Proposed-CNN (fusion-signal_B)93.32552.36
    Proposed-CNN (fusion-signal)93.41559.21
    Table 2. Contrast results of experiments
    Yingfu Guo, Weiming Quan, Wenyun Wang, Hao Zhou, Longzhou Zou. Crack Diagnosis Method of Wind Turbine Blade Based on Convolution Neural Network with 3D Vibration Information Fusion[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(22): 2212004
    Download Citation