• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 3, 030103 (2020)
Tiansong Li1、2、**, Xiang Gao1、2、*, Xiaoyan Zhou1, and Rongkai Yang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, 541004, China
  • 2Guangxi Key Laboratory of Precision Navigation Technology and Application, Guilin, Guangxi, 541004, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.030103 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Tiansong Li, Xiang Gao, Xiaoyan Zhou, Rongkai Yang. Characteristic Analysis of Underwater Laser Propagation Based on Sahu-Shanmugam and Fournier-Forand Volume Scattering Functions[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(3): 030103 Copy Citation Text show less
    Different scattering functions. (a) Scattering functions; (b) correlation coefficients of scattering functions
    Fig. 1. Different scattering functions. (a) Scattering functions; (b) correlation coefficients of scattering functions
    Scattering distribution function
    Fig. 2. Scattering distribution function
    Simulation program diagram of underwater photon transmission
    Fig. 3. Simulation program diagram of underwater photon transmission
    Time domain impulse responses in three typical waters. (a) Time domain impulse response in harbor water; (b) time domain impulse response in coastal water; (c) time domain impulse response in clear seawater
    Fig. 4. Time domain impulse responses in three typical waters. (a) Time domain impulse response in harbor water; (b) time domain impulse response in coastal water; (c) time domain impulse response in clear seawater
    Beam distribution on the receiving surface of clear seawater. (a) z=9 m; (b) z=12 m; (c) z=15 m
    Fig. 5. Beam distribution on the receiving surface of clear seawater. (a) z=9 m; (b) z=12 m; (c) z=15 m
    Beam distribution of receiving surface in coastal water. (a) z=9 m; (b) z=12 m; (c) z=15 m
    Fig. 6. Beam distribution of receiving surface in coastal water. (a) z=9 m; (b) z=12 m; (c) z=15 m
    Receiving surface beam distribution in harbor water. (a) z=9 m; (b) z=12 m; (c) z=15 m
    Fig. 7. Receiving surface beam distribution in harbor water. (a) z=9 m; (b) z=12 m; (c) z=15 m
    Beam power density distribution. (a) Clear seawater; (b) Coastal water; (c) Harbor water
    Fig. 8. Beam power density distribution. (a) Clear seawater; (b) Coastal water; (c) Harbor water
    Optical power density of beams with different transmission distances in three typical waters. (a) Clear seawater; (b) coastal water; (c) harbor water
    Fig. 9. Optical power density of beams with different transmission distances in three typical waters. (a) Clear seawater; (b) coastal water; (c) harbor water
    κdκeκfκgκhκiκjκkκlκoκpκqκ
    17×10-5-0.042-0.6810.08004×10-5-0.06-0.78-0.03-1.2×10-40.010.280.04
    21.9×10-5-0.144-0.9710.00071×10-50.010.290.22-2.1×10-40.01-0.05-0.62
    3-6×10-50.1153.200-0.9450-2×10-5-0.03-0.47-0.662.6×10-4-0.17-4.063.19
    Table 1. Computing the scattering function in range of 0.1°≤θ<5°
    κdκeκfκgκhκiκjκkκlκoκpκqκ
    1-0.00223-0.593-7.821.883-0.00028-0.098-1.0760.2370.000840.29733.147-0.749
    20.020095.15570.69-16.6570.002720.90110.017-2.203-0.00759-2.7348-29.6506.724
    3-0.06150-14.590-202.4347.885-0.00762-2.739-31.1396.5510.021828.182893.450-21.460
    40.0548812.940185.04-44.5130.007782.65830.378-7.101-0.02058-7.7529-96.29023.710
    Table 2. Computing the scattering function in range of 5°<θ≤90°
    Water typeScattering parameterAttenuation parameter
    Clear seawater0.0370.151
    Coastal water0.2190.398
    Harbor water1.8242.190
    Table 3. Channel simulation parameters
    Water typeProbability
    9 m12 m15 m
    Clear seawater99.9499.7799.35
    Coastal water99.5697.9193.55
    Harbor water44.9024.9516.65
    Table 4. Beam distribution probability with a receiving surface diameter of 6 m%
    Tiansong Li, Xiang Gao, Xiaoyan Zhou, Rongkai Yang. Characteristic Analysis of Underwater Laser Propagation Based on Sahu-Shanmugam and Fournier-Forand Volume Scattering Functions[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(3): 030103
    Download Citation