• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 55, Issue 6, 061503 (2018)
Hailin Kang, Ting Zhao, Hua Zhou, Qiao Liu*, and Zhengping Zhang
Author Affiliations
  • College of Big Data and Information Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP55.061503 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hailin Kang, Ting Zhao, Hua Zhou, Qiao Liu, Zhengping Zhang. Improved Long Time Tracking Algorithm by Combining BRISK and Region Estimation[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(6): 061503 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of TLD target tracking
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of TLD target tracking
    Layout strategy of tracking points. (a) Tracking points used by traditional TLD algorithms; (b)-(d) combination of uniform points and BRISK feature points
    Fig. 2. Layout strategy of tracking points. (a) Tracking points used by traditional TLD algorithms; (b)-(d) combination of uniform points and BRISK feature points
    Diagram of regional prediction
    Fig. 3. Diagram of regional prediction
    Diagram of Markov direction prediction
    Fig. 4. Diagram of Markov direction prediction
    Results of part test of different video sequences. (a) Truck; (b) pedestrian; (c) jumper; (d) bus; (e) motorcycle
    Fig. 5. Results of part test of different video sequences. (a) Truck; (b) pedestrian; (c) jumper; (d) bus; (e) motorcycle
    ImagenumberTLDRef. [10]StruckalgorithmProposedalgorithm
    Fig. 5(a)96.3398.0187.41100.00
    Fig. 5(b)91.1794.4863.8597.01
    Fig. 5(c)91.8494.23100.0091.99
    Fig. 5(d)92.5095.2981.3697.65
    Fig. 5(e)92.4695.2484.09100.00
    Table 1. Comparison of tracking success rate of different algorithms%
    ImagenumberTLDRef. [10]StruckalgorithmProposedalgorithm
    Fig. 5(a)9.587.7413.855.19
    Fig. 5(b)11.729.8124.618.27
    Fig. 5(c)12.415.365.024.85
    Fig. 5(d)9.668.2816.947.73
    Fig. 5(e)10.087.2913.666.48
    Table 2. Comparison of tracking center position precision of different algorithms
    ImagenumberTLDRef. [10]StruckalgorithmProposedalgorithm
    Fig. 5(a)14.3815.716.9121.63
    Fig. 5(b)15.9717.096.6720.29
    Fig. 5(c)17.7419.267.3322.73
    Fig. 5(d)11.5613.058.2518.41
    Fig. 5(e)14.2216.877.4920.04
    Table 3. Comparison of tracking speed of different algorithmsframe/s
    Hailin Kang, Ting Zhao, Hua Zhou, Qiao Liu, Zhengping Zhang. Improved Long Time Tracking Algorithm by Combining BRISK and Region Estimation[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(6): 061503
    Download Citation