• Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
  • Vol. 40, Issue 11, 3556 (2020)
Yu-ping HUANG1、1、*, De-zhen WANG1、1, Hai-yan ZHOU1、1, Yu-tu YANG1、1, and Kun-jie CHEN1、1
Author Affiliations
  • 1[in Chinese]
  • 11. College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)11-3556-06 Cite this Article
    Yu-ping HUANG, De-zhen WANG, Hai-yan ZHOU, Yu-tu YANG, Kun-jie CHEN. Ripeness Assessment of Tomato Fruit by Optical Absorption and Scattering Coefficient Spectra[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2020, 40(11): 3556 Copy Citation Text show less
    Different maturity stages for tomatoes based on their internal and surface color
    Fig. 1. Different maturity stages for tomatoes based on their internal and surface color
    Schematic of the spatially-resolved spectroscopy system (a), and the flexible probe (b)
    Fig. 2. Schematic of the spatially-resolved spectroscopy system (a), and the flexible probe (b)
    Procedure of calculating μa and μ's
    Fig. 3. Procedure of calculating μa and μ's
    Mean spectra of (a) absorption (μa) and (b) reduced scattering (μ's) coefficients for tomato fruit at the six maturity stages
    Fig. 4. Mean spectra of (a) absorption (μa) and (b) reduced scattering (μ's) coefficients for tomato fruit at the six maturity stages
    μaμ'sμa×μ'sμeff
    Six
    maturity
    Surface color0.8450.2300.8550.855
    Internal color0.7400.2050.7850.750
    Three
    maturity
    Surface color0.9350.5000.9450.930
    Internal color0.9400.4850.9400.940
    Table 1. The overall classification accuracies for tomato maturity in test set
    GreenBreakerTurningPinkLight RedRedClassification Accuracy
    GreenSurface
    Internal
    34
    29
    2
    7
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0.971
    0.967
    BreakerSurface
    Internal
    1
    1
    25
    12
    4
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0.833
    0.444
    TurningSurface
    Internal
    0
    0
    3
    8
    26
    30
    5
    1
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0.813
    0.732
    PinkSurface
    Internal
    0
    0
    0
    0
    2
    10
    25
    27
    2
    3
    0
    0
    0.781
    0.900
    Light
    Red
    Surface
    Internal
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    2
    2
    30
    24
    4
    3
    0.833
    0.706
    RedSurface
    Internal
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    4
    6
    31
    35
    0.886
    0.921
    Table 2. Classification accuracies for tomato of six maturity stages using μa×μ's in test set
    Green/BreakerTurning/PinkLight Red/RedClassification Accuracy
    Green/BreakerSurface
    Internal
    61
    54
    3
    2
    0
    0
    0.938
    0.947
    Turning/PinkSurface
    Internal
    4
    3
    60
    67
    3
    5
    0.938
    0.944
    Light Red/RedSurface
    Internal
    0
    0
    1
    2
    68
    67
    0.958
    0.931
    Table 3. Classification accuracies for tomato of three maturity stages using μa×μ's in test set
    Yu-ping HUANG, De-zhen WANG, Hai-yan ZHOU, Yu-tu YANG, Kun-jie CHEN. Ripeness Assessment of Tomato Fruit by Optical Absorption and Scattering Coefficient Spectra[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2020, 40(11): 3556
    Download Citation