Author Affiliations
1National Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science on Synthetic Vision, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan , China2College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan , China3Haina Tongchuang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Karamay 834000, Xinjiang , China4Wisesoft Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610065, Sichuan , Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Three-dimensional reconstruction platform based on speckle stripe structured light stereo matching
Fig. 2. Flow chart of three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm
Fig. 3. Digital speckle pattern
Fig. 4. Epipolar geometry in binocular stereo vision
Fig. 5. Principle of region-based stereo matching
Fig. 6. Standard sinusoidal grating fringe pattern
Fig. 7. Rough matching based on speckle
Fig. 8. Sub-pixel matching based on phase linear interpolation. (a) Matching point on the right side of Xr1; (b) matching point on the left side of Xr1
Fig. 9. Deformed grating stripes of the face to be tested. (a) Left camera; (b) right camera
Fig. 10. Processing of the truncated phase boundary. (a) Maximum point of wrapped phase map; (b) minimum point of wrapped phase map
Fig. 11. Modeling disparity map of the face of the model to be tested. (a) Coarse matching; (b) fine matching
Fig. 12. Experiment platform
Fig. 13. Modeling results of different methods. (a) Texture map of the face to be tested; (b) method I; (c) method II; (d) modeling results of texture sticking of our method; (e) modeling results of our method; (f) method III
Measure time | TFTS | Ours |
---|
Error /mm | Error ratio /% | Error /mm | Error ratio /% |
---|
Mean | 0.0328 | 3.08 | 0.0339 | 3.39 | 1 | 0.0199 | 1.99 | 0.0202 | 2.02 | 2 | 0.0458 | 4.58 | 0.0361 | 3.61 | 3 | 0.0327 | 3.27 | 0.0453 | 4.53 |
|
Table 1. Measurement results of distance of sphere centre
Measure time | TFTS | Ours |
---|
Error /mm | Error ratio /% | Error /mm | Error ratio /% |
---|
Mean | 0.0485 | 0.096 | 0.0543 | 0.107 | 1 | 0.0226 | 0.045 | 0.0346 | 0.068 | 2 | 0.0522 | 0.103 | 0.0271 | 0.053 | 3 | 0.0708 | 0.139 | 0.1012 | 0.199 |
|
Table 2. Measurement results of the diameter of right ball
Method | Average distance | Standard deviation |
---|
Method Ⅰ | 0.326626 | 0.110129 | Method Ⅱ | 0.294924 | 0.101619 | Ours | 0.245987 | 0.092571 |
|
Table 3. Face modeling errors of different methods
Method | Method Ⅰ | Method Ⅱ | Method Ⅲ | Ours |
---|
Time | 2.8 | 3.1 | 12.2 | 5.2 |
|
Table 4. Modeling time of four methods