Characterizing the state of polarization (SOP) of lasers plays an essential role in various fields, ranging from fundamental science to applications. At variance with single frequency lasers, ultrafast lasers have a much wider spectrum, due to mode-locking into ultrashort pulse trains. Recently, it has been found that ultrafast lasers may generate complex wavelength-dependent polarization structures [1–13]. Therefore, the precise characterization of the wavelength-resolved SOP of ultrafast lasers is of great fundamental and technological significance. For example, polarization-dependent regimes and complex polarization evolution processes, including polarization-locked [1,2] and polarization rotation phenomena [3–5], have been widely reported in laser cavities combining nonlinearity with dispersion. Ultrafast manipulation [14,15], pulse shaping [16,17], and biomedical imaging [18–23] require accurate measurements of the SOP of ultrafast lasers. Nevertheless, since high-speed detection and wavelength-resolved measurements cannot be simultaneously achieved by commercial polarization analyzers or channeled spectropolarimeters [24], single-shot measurements of the wavelength-resolved SOP of ultrafast laser pulses have, to our knowledge, rarely been reported.

Well-established polarization measurement methods have been proposed for characterizing continuous wave (CW) laser emission. However, methods such as time sharing or rotating wave plates suffer the disadvantage of low speed of operation [25,26]. Although beam splitting methods, such as the division-of-amplitude, where four components of rapidly varying signals can be simultaneously detected [27–31], permit high-speed SOP detection, they fail to be wavelength resolved, due to their lack of capability to perform high-speed measurement of wide spectrum data. Therefore, combining high-speed SOP detection with wavelength-resolved measurement is essential for carrying out single-shot measurements of the wavelength-resolved SOP from ultrafast lasers.

In this paper, we propose and experimentally demonstrate a new method for the single-shot measurement of wavelength-resolved SOP for ultrafast lasers. Our approach is based on combining the division-of-amplitude technique with the dispersive Fourier transform (DFT) method. In previous work, temporal–spectral mapping through time-stretching DFT was utilized for characterizing the rapidly evolving spectra from ultrafast lasers [12,13,32–43]. Here, we decompose the single-shot spectra by projecting them in a spatial optical module based on the division-of-amplitude principle. This permits us to detect the four intensity components necessary to obtain the SOP by means of a high-speed photodetection system. After calibrating our SOP detection system matrix by means of a CW laser with tunable wavelength, we are able to reconstruct a wavelength-resolved set of Stokes parameters. Our method is tested on a typical type of ultrafast laser, the dissipative soliton (DS). We identify wavelength-dependent SOP structures in a DS laser operating in the net normal cavity dispersion regime. Our method may thus lead to finding new regimes of fascinating SOP evolution dynamics in the emission of ultrafast lasers. These dynamics are otherwise hidden from us when SOP information is neglected in the study of ultrafast lasers.

The precise SOP measurement of any ultrafast laser can be achieved by obtaining the wavelength-resolved Stokes parameters with a high-speed detection system. As shown in Fig. 1, a single-shot spectrum measurement is performed via DFT within a section of dispersion compensation fiber (DCF). Due to the large group velocity dispersion, ultrafast pulses propagating in a DCF undergo far-field transformation. When neglecting higher-order dispersion terms, a linear wavelength-to-time mapping is obtained according to the relationship [32] Δt=|D|LΔλ,(1)where Δt is the time duration after mapping, D is the group delay dispersion coefficient, L is the propagation distance, and Δλ is the optical spectral bandwidth of the laser pulses.

After time stretching, the dispersed pulses are split into four optical channels by the division-of-amplitude technique [27,28]. For each individual wavelength λ, its SOP is described by a wavelength-resolved Stokes vector S(λ)=(S0,S1,S2,S3)T, which can be reconstructed at each wavelength from the measured intensity vector from the four channels I(λ)=(I0,I1,I2,I3)T at each wavelength. The intensity detected by the photodetector in each channel can be expressed as a linear combination of four Stokes parameters Ii(λ)=ai1S0+ai2S1+ai3S2+ai4S3. We use a 4×4 wavelength-dependent system matrix A(λ) to express the relationships between the vector of intensities and the Stokes vector as I(λ)=A(λ)S(λ). When the determinant of matrix A(λ) is non-vanishing, viz., det[A(λ)]≠0, the inverse of A(λ) can be found. Then, by measuring the intensities of the four channels, the wavelength-resolved SOPs can be calculated as S(λ)=A−1(λ)I(λ).(2)

Some additional SOP parameters can be deduced from the Stokes parameters. For example, the spherical orientation angle θ and ellipticity angle ψ of the polarization ellipse can be calculated from the Stokes parameters, θ=arctan(S2/S1)/2, ψ=arctan(S3/S12+S22)/2, whereas SOP fluctuations can be measured by computing the relative distance between two points on the Poincaré sphere: ΔS=(S1′−S1)2+(S2′−S2)2+(S3′−S3)2,(3)where Si (i=1,2,3) and Si′ (i=1,2,3) represent Stokes parameters of two points. Therefore, the deviation ΔS is not the simple average deviation of S1, S2, and S3.

As schematically depicted in Fig. 2, the DS ring cavity contains 20 m of erbium-doped fiber (EDF) with a dispersion of −12.2ps/(nm·km), forward pumped by a 976 nm diode laser through a 1550/980 nm wavelength division multiplexer (WDM). The saturable absorber (SA) is made from single-wall carbon nanotubes. The rest of the cavity includes a polarization-independent isolator (ISO), a polarization controller (PC), 6.8 m of single-mode fiber (SMF) with dispersion of 18 ps/(nm·km), and an optical coupler (OC1) with a 10% output port. The net normal dispersion is 0.155ps2. The DFT is achieved by using 2 km of DCF with dispersion of about −300ps/(nm·km). The temporal signal is fed into a high-speed photodetector with 8 GHz bandwidth. Moreover, taking into account the analog bandwidth of 20 GHz and maximum sampling rate of 50 GSa/s of the digital oscilloscope (Tektronix, DSA 72004B), the electronic response is mainly limited by the photodetector. The spectral resolution is mainly determined by the DFT, and the division-of-amplitude does not impose a spectral resolution limitation. Given the device parameters (group velocity dispersion, analog bandwidths of the photodetector and oscilloscope, and sampling rate of the oscilloscope) in our experiment, the spectral resolution is about 0.2 nm [32]. The optical spectrum of the output signal is measured by an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA, Yokogawa AQ6370). For the division-of-amplitude, we built the spatial system through a collimator (C0) leading to a parallel beam, which then is divided into four paths by three beam splitters (BS1–BS3) with a transmission reflection ratio of 5:5. The angles of four analyzers (P1–P4) are set to 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°, respectively, and the intersection angle between the quarter-wave plate (Q1) and analyzer in the fourth path is 45°. The orientation of 0° is parallel to the platform. In this way, any SOP, including linear polarizations and circular polarizations, can be recognized. To input an arbitrary SOP in the calibration process, a polarizer and a quarter-wave plate play the role of polarization state generator, which is shown on the pink plate and marked by a pink arrow. The outputs from the four channels are received by four collimators (C1–C4). Photoelectric conversion is achieved by four identical high-speed photodetectors (PD1–PD4) with a bandwidth of 8 GHz and a digital oscilloscope with a bandwidth of 20 GHz.

Before carrying out the measurements, the system of division-of-amplitude needs to be calibrated first, so the wavelength-dependent system matrix A(λ) can be determined. In this process, we used a tunable CW laser as the optical source, with a wavelength ranging between 1500 and 1630 nm. We conducted the calibration covering the spectral range of the signal under test. When using fiber with large dispersion and high-speed electronic devices, spectral resolution can be much higher. However, when following such a spectral resolution, the calibration of broad wavelength range matrices may be extremely time consuming. Therefore, a relatively large spectral step simplifies the calibration process, and also the following polarization reconstruction process. Therefore, we chose a step of 0.5 nm for calibration of matrices, and SOPs of intermediate wavelengths are reconstructed by interpolation. Next, we fixed the polarizer at the angle θ=90°, and we progressively rotated the quarter-wave plate from the intersection angle of 0° up to 180°, with a step of 5°, across a span of 180°. To reduce the effects associated with imperfections in optical elements, we used the equator-poles method for calibration [31]. Four points, located on the equator and at the poles, are chosen as four known vectors.

Figure 3 depicts the calibration results based on the equator-poles method. The four vectors of SOP are (1,−1,0,0)T, (1,0,1,0)T, (1,0,0,1)T, and (1,0,0,−1)T. As shown in Figs. 3(a)–3(c), the measured S1, S2, and S3 at 1550 nm overlap with the theoretical curves. A mean standard deviation of 0.03 was obtained between the positions of the measured and theoretical Stokes vectors on the Poincaré sphere, as depicted in Fig. 3(f). After calibration at 1550 nm, we tested the division-of-amplitude system over a wide wavelength range. As displayed in Figs. 3(d) and 3(e), the selected wavelengths are 1560, 1566, and 1572 nm. The corresponding deviations are almost the same for all the three wavelengths. The mean value of deviation for every rotation angle and for each of the three wavelengths is less than 0.07. After carrying out the calibration by means of wavelength tuning from 1555 to 1575 nm, we could perform accurate wavelength-resolved SOP measurements within a range of 20 nm.

When optical gain is provided by a 20 m EDF with normal dispersion, we obtain the generation of a DS in the dissipative fiber laser cavity, due to a balance of nonlinearity, dispersion, gain, and loss [33–35,44,45]. As shown in Fig. 4(a), the averaged optical spectrum ranges from 1561 to 1573 nm at the pump power of 28 mW. As the pump power is further increased, the wave-breaking-free rectangle shaped DS spectrum is gradually broadened. For the DFT method, higher order dispersion could distort the linear mapping from the spectral domain to time domain. In theory, higher order dispersion can be compensated for by fiber with inverse dispersion. The comparison between the averaged spectrum and that retrieved from a temporal waveform obtained by the DFT method is given in Fig. 4(a). As we can see, clear consistency is shown and the deviation comes from the EDF amplifier. Due to the negative dispersion of DCF, the label of a short time corresponds to that of a long wavelength. The DS autocorrelation trace is fitted by a Gaussian function, shown in Fig. 4(b), and the FWHM pulse duration is about 30 ps. Furthermore, as depicted in Fig. 4(c), we filtered the broad spectrum by a tunable optical filter (Santec, OTF-320) with a bandwidth of 0.2 nm: the corresponding SOPs along all of the filtered wavelengths were measured by means of a polarization state analyzer (General Photonics, PSGA-101-A). As can be seen, a nonlinear trajectory was obtained for the wavelength evolution of the SOP on the Poincaré sphere. The corresponding phase plane trajectory, based on the spherical orientation angle θ and ellipticity angle ψ, is illustrated in Fig. 4(d). The spherical orientation angle variation is about 0.25 rad, and the ellipticity angle variation is equal to nearly 0.3 rad. According to measurement details in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d), the absolute SOP of the output after the cavity would be distorted by the fiber between OC1 and the measurement device, consisting of a tunable filter and a commercial polarization analyzer. Therefore, the data in the two figures exhibit relative rather than absolute polarization distribution. For DSs, a strong linear phase chirp is expected across the broad spectrum, and their SOPs slowly vary along wavelengths. Moreover, for any stable mode-locked pulse laser with broad spectra, no matter whether transform-limited or phase chirped, there are always phase differences between lasing longitudinal modes, due to their wavelength differences. The phase differences across lasing wavelengths result in the evolution of SOPs along wavelengths on the Poincaré sphere. Further, as the SOPs tend to be evolving linearly, both ellipticity and direction of the major axis change gradually depending on the wavelength. It is should be noticed that the averaged polarization data in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) are time-averaged measurements for the DSs with stable operation. This result is not accurate enough, but is given to show that the DSs have wavelength-related polarization structures. The transient polarization dynamics during buildup of DSs can be resolved only by the single-shot measurement we proposed.

To unveil these dynamics, we performed single-shot wavelength-resolved transient SOP measurements during the build-up phase of the DS, when the pump power is switched on from zero up to 28 mW. The single-shot spectra detected within the four channels are shown in Figs. 5(a)–5(d). There are more than 9000 round trips with a temporal period of 134 ns. Here, the spectral information of the DS is time-stretched into 7.2 ns via DFT. In our detection system, any slight difference of arrival times within the four channels can be compensated for by precisely tuning the optical paths. Based on the detected spectral intensities in the four channels, and the inverse matrix of the division-of-amplitude system, we managed to reconstruct the wavelength-resolved evolution of the normalized Stokes parameters.

Specifically, in Figs. 5(a)–5(d) three regions, I, II, and III, are selected: each shows distinct dynamics. For region I, spectral broadening is initiated via self-phase modulation, and it is followed by spectral intensity fluctuations. As shown in Fig. 5(e), the corresponding SOP distribution is randomly distributed on the Poincaré sphere, in particular for wavelengths at the spectrum edges. Within region II, the broadened spectrum oscillates periodically: in Fig. 5(f), the corresponding SOP distribution appears to occupy specific regions on the Poincaré sphere. Whenever stable DSs are formed, such as in region III, the stable mode-locking mechanism appears to dominate the SOP evolution process. As depicted in Fig. 5(g), the SOPs are distributed within island-shaped regions. These single-shot results are different from the observations reported in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d), and the difference originates from the distortion induced by the tunable filter or fiber between OC1 and the commercial polarization analyzer. These two optical components distorted the absolute SOP of the output after the cavity. In fact, another wavelength-resolved polarization distribution for DSs using a filter-based conventional method has been obtained [12], which is more similar to the single-shot results. The point is that the time-averaged and distorted data for stable DSs are not accurate enough, when compared with those obtained from our proposed method, let alone for DSs with transient polarization dynamics. The physical mechanism behind the observed SOP dynamics can be associated with the large nonlinear frequency chirp of DSs, which eventually leads to a variation of the SOP for its different spectral components [44,45]. By increasing the pump power, the nonlinear chirp grows larger. This can be revealed by comparing the wavelength-resolved SOPs of stable DSs for different pump powers. As shown in Fig. 5(h), the SOP trajectories for three values of pump power are similar in the middle of the spectrum, both exhibiting zig-zag-shaped fluctuations. For wavelengths at the spectrum edges, intense SOP fluctuations occur, whose detailed behavior cannot be quantitatively resolved.

To quantitatively compare the differences in SOP evolutions within different round trips, in Fig. 6, we report the measured Stokes parameters. For wavelengths around 1561 nm in regions I and II, the Stokes parameters experience intense fluctuations, since they are associated with the newly generated frequencies that grow in the process of spectrum broadening [Figs. 6(a) and 6(b)]. For region III, associated with stable mode-locking, the Stokes parameters appear to be stabilized [Fig. 6(c)]. It should be pointed out that measuring Stokes parameters with zero values does not mean that the light depolarized. This is because in our data processing, we removed the Stokes parameter points whenever the intensities of the four channels were at low levels of electronic noise.

For wavelengths of 1564 and 1570 nm in region I [Figs. 6(d) and 6(j)], intense oscillations and polarization conversion are observed in the process of spectral broadening, whereas the corresponding Stokes parameters remain stable in regions II and III. For the wavelength at 1567 nm, namely, near the central part of the spectrum, the Stokes parameters always vary slightly, which suggests that SOPs within the central part of the spectrum are less affected by the process of DS build-up. As depicted in Figs. 6(m)–6(o), we computed the mean values and standard deviations of the Stokes parameters at the four selected wavelengths as a function of the number of round trips in regions I, II, and III, respectively. As can be seen, the SOPs of wavelengths located at the spectrum edges fluctuate more intensely than SOPs for the central portion of the spectrum, which is consistent with the previously discussed behavior. The observed large fluctuations originate from both the measurement error and the unique SOP dynamics of the DSs. Measurement error induced by electronic noise cannot be completely eliminated when the low light intensities of the four channels are close to the electronic noise level. In our experiments, electronic noise is at about 4 mV. Therefore, the lowest power of signals that can be resolved should be higher than 4 mV.

In our measurement system, several key parameters can be optimized, including the detection bandwidth, spectral resolution, and detecting precision. Primarily, the detection bandwidth of the measurement system is essentially determined by the optoelectronic components, including the bandwidth of the photodetector, the sampling rate of the digital oscilloscope or other electronic digitizers, and possibly the data processing speed, whenever a real-time measurement is desired. Key factors that limit the spectral resolution include group velocity dispersion, sampling rate of the oscilloscope, and analog bandwidths of the oscilloscope and detector. The mathematical expression can also be found in detail in Ref. [32]. In our system, a spectral resolution of 0.2 nm is obtained. Yet, this can be further reduced down to 0.08 nm by using 2 km of DCF and 20 GHz photodetectors. Of course, the nonlinearity of wavelength-to-time mapping, and the repetition rate of ultrafast lasers will limit the optimization of the available spectral resolution.

The detecting uncertainty, which can be partially revealed by the observed large SOP fluctuations, originates from the fact that we are measuring the wavelength-resolved SOPs of an ultrafast laser, rather than the SOPs of a single-frequency CW laser. When a Mueller matrix is performed, as occurs in the division-of-amplitude method, the measurement process averages all elements of the Mueller matrix via a convolution process, and the instrument response function is determined by the various instrument uncertainties, such as measurement time (determined by the bandwidth of our optoelectronics components) and spectral resolution [46,47]. For commercial polarization analyzers used with CW lasers at low measurement speed, the photocurrents detected by the photodetectors are integrated over a relatively long measurement time and a wide spectral bandwidth. Therefore, the obtained SOPs in Fig. 4(c) appear to be more stable and localized. In our case, the measurement time is much shorter, and the spectroscopy conducted through DFT further reduces the detected photocurrents, leading to larger uncertainties. Moreover, the measurement system, consisting of fiber, is sensitive to environmental vibration and temperature change, and these environmental factors would induce phase variation and birefringence of fibers, also resulting in detecting uncertainty. In the future, the environmental sensitivity can be reduced by free-space optics systems or on-chip integration systems.

SOPs measured by our system are consistent with the filtering results in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) to a certain extent, which suggests that wavelength-dependent characteristics of SOPs under wavelength-resolved single-shot measurement are indeed the intrinsic feature of DS. Yet, our measured SOPs are not exactly the same as those from the output of laser cavity, due to fiber-induced variation of SOPs through propagation between OC1 and C0. Nevertheless, the relative difference of wavelength-related SOPs inside each DS pulse can be identified. Wavelength-dependent SOPs do exist in our DS fiber laser cavity, as no polarization-dependent device is employed in it. In fact, wavelength-resolved SOPs are already observed by a filtering method [12], which implies that the dispersed DCF is not the reason for the observation of wavelength-dependent SOPs. Another point that should be noticed is that vector solitons revealed by DFT together with polarization orthogonal decomposition (i.e., polarization beam splitter) have been reported [3,4,6,8], but wavelength-resolved SOPs cannot be obtained from just two linear decomposition methods. On the contrary, for the method of division-of-amplitude that we used here, both linearly polarized and circularly polarized input signals can be recognized by virtue of polarizers and phase retarders. As a result, full-Stokes information can be obtained by the method proposed here, and it is anticipated that the wavelength-related, full-Stokes analysis would play a crucial role in the field of imaging and biomedical diagnosis.

Given the strong temporal–spectral correlation for ultrafast lasers, which is different from CW or quasi-CW lasers with single frequencies, it is worth discussing the physics of wavelength-resolved polarizations. According to the classical definition, the CW or quasi-CW laser is a kind of static or quasi-static electromagnetic field vector; the polarization is in the direction of the electric field or magnetic field for a single wavelength (or frequency). As they hold for a certain period, their polarization states can be determined precisely by time averaging. However, ultrafast lasers, through mode-locking, have broad spectra (thousands of longitudinal modes), and they are highly temporally–spectrally correlated. Therefore, for instantaneous electromagnetic field vectors, such as femtosecond lasers, the direction of the electric or magnetic field holds only for an ultrashort period, which is inaccessible for any electronic devices with limited responses. Due to the temporal–spectral correlation, the polarizations (or directions) across the lasing wavelengths can be measured in the spectral domain. Our proposed single-shot measurement, by combining DFT and division-of-amplitude, provides a reliable way to find the polarization distribution in the spectral domain. Further investigation and discussion about the physics are needed.

In conclusion, we demonstrated a new system for wavelength-resolved, high-speed SOP measurement, by combining the method of division-of-amplitude together with DFT under the far-field transformation. When the single-shot spectrum measurement by DFT is extended via the division-of-amplitude method, the wavelength-resolved SOP measurement for each optical pulse is achieved with high speed, by reconstructing the Mueller matrix. As a proof-of-concept demonstration, we experimentally investigated the nonlinear wavelength-resolved polarization dynamics in the build-up process of DSs. We believe that our SOP measurement method will find applications in fundamental physics, such as ultrafast laser measurements and studies of nonlinear optical processes, and will also expand the capabilities of different polarization-related techniques, such as pulse shaping and hyperspectral polarization imaging.