Author Affiliations
Institute of Nuclear Engineering, Rocket Force Engineering University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710025, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Illustration of calculating pixel's spectral anomaly index and spatial structure anomaly index
Fig. 2. Flow chart of SSAD algorithm
Fig. 3. Experimental data 1. (a) Grey-scale map of the 130th band image; (b) spatial distribution map of targets
Fig. 4. Experimental data 2. (a) Grey-scale map of the 30th band image; (b) spatial distribution map of targets
Fig. 5. Experimental data 3. (a) Grey-scale map of the 100th band image; (b) spatial distribution map of targets
Fig. 6. Comparison of detection results on data 1 with different anomaly detection algorithms. (a) RX algorithm; (b) CRD algorithm; (c) LSMAD algorithm; (d) SSAD algorithm
Fig. 7. Comparison of detection results on data 2 with different anomaly detection algorithms. (a) RX algorithm; (b) CRD algorithm; (c) LSMAD algorithm; (d) SSAD algorithm
Fig. 8. Comparison of detection results on data 3 with different anomaly detection algorithms. (a) RX algorithm; (b) CRD algorithm; (c) LSMAD algorithm; (d) SSAD algorithm
Fig. 9. Comparison of ROC curves for different anomaly detection algorithms. (a) Data 1; (b) data 2; (c) data 3
Inner windowsize /(pixel×pixel) | Data 1 | Data 2 | Data 3 |
---|
AUC | Execution time /s | AUC | Execution time /s | AUC | Execution time /s |
---|
3×3 | 0.9912 | 13.93 | 0.9042 | 9.862 | 0.9998 | 7.010 | 5×5 | 0.9960 | 16.10 | 0.8633 | 11.30 | 0.9997 | 8.039 | 7×7 | 0.9960 | 18.70 | 0.7949 | 13.20 | 0.9993 | 9.315 | 9×9 | 0.9949 | 21.77 | 0.7151 | 15.64 | 0.9993 | 10.85 | 11×11 | 0.9943 | 25.60 | 0.6470 | 18.17 | 0.9989 | 12.52 |
|
Table 1. Effect of inner window size on SSAD algorithm detection performance
Algorithm | Data 1 | Data 2 | Data 3 |
---|
AUC | Execution time /s | AUC | Execution time /s | AUC | Execution time /s |
---|
RX | 0.8003 | 2.488 | 0.7073 | 1.670 | 0.9983 | 1.280 | CRD | 0.9931 | 585.6 | 0.9260 | 102.6 | 0.9962 | 63.09 | LSMAD | 0.8820 | 8.401 | 0.4121 | 6.930 | 0.9995 | 3.766 | SSAD | 0.9960 | 16.10 | 0.9042 | 9.886 | 0.9998 | 7.010 |
|
Table 2. AUC and execution time of different anomaly detection algorithms