Author Affiliations
1School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, Shanxi, China2National Key Laboratory of Scattering and Radiation, Shanghai 201109, China3School of Information and Communication Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, Shanxi, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Comparison results of relationship between spatial frequency and minimum resolvable temperature difference
Fig. 2. Computational domain and grid
Fig. 3. Observation schematic diagram of ground-based infrared detection system
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of representative detection surface of aircraft
[22] Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of atmospheric transmittance
Fig. 6. Contours of aircraft flow field. (a) Pressure of flow field; (b) Mach number of flow field; (c) temperature of flow field
Fig. 7. Radiation intensities at different observation angles within detection surface 1
Fig. 8. Radiation intensities at different observation angles within detection surface 2
Fig. 9. Maximum detection range in long wave band of detection surface 1
Fig. 10. Maximum detection range in medium wave band of detection surface 1
Fig. 11. Maximum detection range in long wave band of detection surface 2
Fig. 12. Maximum detection range in medium wave band of detection surface 2
Fig. 13. Maximum observation range of ground-based infrared system
Fig. 14. Maximum observation range of MRTD visual range prediction model at different observation levels
Bullet surface temperature /K | 500 | 600 | 700 |
---|
Distance(Ref.)/km | 4.83 | 5.82 | 6.29 | Distance(Cal.)/km | 4.89 | 5.24 | 5.45 | Error /% | 1.24 | 9.97 | 13.35 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of calculation results of MDTD visual range prediction model
Parameter | Parameter value |
---|
Clear aperture(mm) | 125.00 | NETD(mK) | 80 | Average transmittance | 0.80 | Frame rate(f/sec) | 25.00 | Horizontal field of view wide/narrow(rad) | 0.15708/0.0524 | Vertical field of view wide/narrow(rad) | 0.11781/0.0393 | Detection element length(μm) | 28 | Detection element width(μm) | 25 | Detecting Element Numbers | 228×4 | Peak value D*(cmHz1/2W-1) | 2.3×1011 |
|
Table 2. Performance parameter of Catherine-GP
[23] Observation level | Discovery | Classify | Recognition | Identify |
---|
ne | 2.0 | 2.8 | 8.0 | 12.8 |
|
Table 3. Number of half cycles (ne) corresponding to different observation levels