Author Affiliations
1College of Marine Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China2Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China3Ocean Remote Sensing Institute, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China4Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao 266237, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Flow chart of ATLAS/ICESAT-2 data preprocessing and calibration
Fig. 2. (a) Photon distribution from sea ice surface (Height of each received photon, relative to the WGS-84 ellipsoid); (b) The photons vertical profile distribution, x-axis is normalized photon counts per bin and y-axis is altitude in meter. The altitude of peak surface return is set to 0 meter in (b)
Fig. 3. (a) Photon distribution from ocean surface (Height of each received photon, relative to the WGS-84 ellipsoid); (b) The photons vertical profile distribution, x-axis is normalized photon counts per bin and y-axis is altitude in meter. The altitude of peak surface return is set to 0 meter in (b)
Fig. 4. (a) Photon distribution from land surface (Height of each received photon, relative to the WGS-84 ellipsoid); (b) The photons vertical profile distribution, x-axis is normalized photon counts per bin and y-axis is altitude in meter. The altitude of peak surface return is set to 0 meter in (b)
Fig. 5. (a) Photon distribution from desert surface (Height of each received photon, relative to the WGS-84 ellipsoid); (b) The photons vertical profile distribution, x-axis is normalized photon counts per bin and y-axis is altitude in meter. The altitude of peak surface return is set to 0 meter in (b)
Fig. 6. Impulse response curves of six beams, in which the green curve is the impulse response function under the beam
Fig. 7. Impulse response of six beams
Fig. 8. Location of marine data used in this paper
Fig. 9. (a) Photon distribution from ocean surface (Height of each received photon, relative to the WGS-84 ellipsoid); (b) The photons vertical profile distribution, x-axis is normalized photon counts per bin and y-axis is altitude in meter. The altitude of peak surface return is set to 0 meter in (b)
Fig. 10. (a)-(f):Calibration results were obtained by using impulse response models under six beams, where the black curve represents the observed ocean profile, the blue curve represents the impulse response model, and the red curve represents the correction results
Fig. 11. The correction results of the observed ocean profile, where the black curve represents the observed ocean profile and the other color curve represents the deconvolution results of different beams
Parameters | Values | | Parameters | Values | Orbit inclination and coverage | 92°;88°S~88°N | Footprint size/m | ~17 | Altitude/km | 500 | | Along-track separation/m | ~0.7 | Track repeat period/day | 91 | Telescope diameter/m | 0.8 | Nominal duration of mission/year | 3 | Number of beams | 6 organized in 3 pairs | Laser wavelength/nm | 532 | Distance with a pair/m | 90 | Transmitted pulse width/ns | 1.5 | Distance between beam pairs/km | ~3.3 | Pulse repetition rate/kHz | 10 | Beam energy per pulse/μJ | 175±17,45±5 |
|
Table 1. Configuration parameters of ATLAS/ICESat-2
[2]