• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 19, 192801 (2019)
Anguo Dong1、**, Hongchao Liu1、*, Qian Zhang1, and Miaomiao Liang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Science, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710064, China
  • 2School of Information Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.192801 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Anguo Dong, Hongchao Liu, Qian Zhang, Miaomiao Liang. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Classification Based on Auto-Encoder[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(19): 192801 Copy Citation Text show less
    Auto-encoder model
    Fig. 1. Auto-encoder model
    Stack auto-encoder and classifier
    Fig. 2. Stack auto-encoder and classifier
    Hyperspectral remote sensing images. (a) True classification picture; (b) classification result of S-SAE algorithm; (c) spectral curves
    Fig. 3. Hyperspectral remote sensing images. (a) True classification picture; (b) classification result of S-SAE algorithm; (c) spectral curves
    Spatial-spectral feature extraction method based on rotation invariant property
    Fig. 4. Spatial-spectral feature extraction method based on rotation invariant property
    Hyperspectral neighborhood information. (a) Spatial position; (b) magnified picture; (c) neighborhood information of point E; (d) neighborhood information of point F
    Fig. 5. Hyperspectral neighborhood information. (a) Spatial position; (b) magnified picture; (c) neighborhood information of point E; (d) neighborhood information of point F
    Classification algorithm framework for deep learning combined with spatial-spectral information
    Fig. 6. Classification algorithm framework for deep learning combined with spatial-spectral information
    Selection of parameters. (a) Selection of number of principal components; (b) selection of window size
    Fig. 7. Selection of parameters. (a) Selection of number of principal components; (b) selection of window size
    Classification results of Pavia University dataset obtained by different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) true classification picture; (c) SVM; (d) CK-SVM; (e) OMP; (f) SOMP; (g) proposed method (unselect); (h) proposed method
    Fig. 8. Classification results of Pavia University dataset obtained by different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) true classification picture; (c) SVM; (d) CK-SVM; (e) OMP; (f) SOMP; (g) proposed method (unselect); (h) proposed method
    Classification results of Indian Pines dataset obtained by different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) true classification picture; (c) SVM; (d) CK-SVM; (e) OMP; (f) SOMP; (g) proposed method (unselect); (h) proposed method
    Fig. 9. Classification results of Indian Pines dataset obtained by different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) true classification picture; (c) SVM; (d) CK-SVM; (e) OMP; (f) SOMP; (g) proposed method (unselect); (h) proposed method
    Effect of number of training samples on overall accuracy of different datasets. (a) Pavia University; (b) Indian Pines
    Fig. 10. Effect of number of training samples on overall accuracy of different datasets. (a) Pavia University; (b) Indian Pines
    ClassNumber of samplesClassification accuracy /%
    TrainTestSVMCK-SVMOMPSOMPOur method (unselect)Our method
    Asphalt200643180.5097.9061.2082.1193.1198.10
    Meadows2001844984.4898.9579.4795.5096.1197.32
    Gravel200189978.9193.7768.0198.1195.2297.17
    Trees200286496.2498.9691.9596.2493.7499.35
    Painted metal sheets200114599.74100.0099.2299.06100.00100.00
    Bare soil200482983.9697.0669.8498.5596.9199.28
    Bitumen200113091.3999.5684.3998.3498.8199.51
    Self-blocking bricks200348281.2796.4576.5294.9096.3996.43
    Shadows20074798.4499.8798.0488.4497.99100.00
    OA /%84.9898.1676.6093.9395.8897.87
    Kappa0.800.980.700.920.940.97
    Table 1. Experimental data and classification accuracy of the Pavia University dataset
    ParameterClassification algorithm
    SVMCK-SVMOMPSOMPOur method (unselect)Our method
    OA /%73.0191.3665.8791.4690.1893.99
    Kappa coefficient0.690.900.610.900.890.93
    Table 2. OA and Kappa coefficient of the Indian Pines dataset obtained by different algorithms
    Anguo Dong, Hongchao Liu, Qian Zhang, Miaomiao Liang. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Classification Based on Auto-Encoder[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(19): 192801
    Download Citation