• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 3, 3010021 (2021)
Li Hu1、2, Wang Jianyu1、2、*, Hong Guanglie1、2, and Wang Yinan3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Space Active Optoelectronic Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China
  • 2Chinese Academy of Sciences University, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0301002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Li Hu, Wang Jianyu, Hong Guanglie, Wang Yinan. Simulation Analysis of Inversion Method of Atmospheric Temperature and Pressure for Laser Occultation[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(3): 3010021 Copy Citation Text show less
    Oxygen absorption cross-section in different conditions near 764 nm wavelength. (a) Position of oxygen absorption line and reference line for pressure inversion at 10 km; (b) oxygen absorption cross-section varies with temperature at 400 hPa; (c) oxygen absorption cross-section varies with pressure at 250 K
    Fig. 1. Oxygen absorption cross-section in different conditions near 764 nm wavelength. (a) Position of oxygen absorption line and reference line for pressure inversion at 10 km; (b) oxygen absorption cross-section varies with temperature at 400 hPa; (c) oxygen absorption cross-section varies with pressure at 250 K
    Flow chart of pressure iterative solution
    Fig. 2. Flow chart of pressure iterative solution
    Position of absorption line and reference line for temperature retrieval(10 km)
    Fig. 3. Position of absorption line and reference line for temperature retrieval(10 km)
    Results of simulation corresponding to 764.7 nm wavelength. (a) Differential transmittance corresponding to different tangent altitudes obtained by simulation; (b) relative error of differential absorption coefficient by inversion at different tangent altitudes
    Fig. 4. Results of simulation corresponding to 764.7 nm wavelength. (a) Differential transmittance corresponding to different tangent altitudes obtained by simulation; (b) relative error of differential absorption coefficient by inversion at different tangent altitudes
    Relative error of inversion pressure at different conditions. (a) Without temperature error and inversion error of differential absorption coefficient; (b) with only temperature error; (c) with only inversion of differential absorption coefficient; (d) with both temperature error and inversion error of differential absorption coefficient
    Fig. 5. Relative error of inversion pressure at different conditions. (a) Without temperature error and inversion error of differential absorption coefficient; (b) with only temperature error; (c) with only inversion of differential absorption coefficient; (d) with both temperature error and inversion error of differential absorption coefficient
    Results of simulation corresponding to 769.79759 nm wavelength. (a) Differential transmittance corresponding to different tangent altitudes obtained by simulation; (b) relative error of differential absorption coefficient by inversion at different tangent altitudes
    Fig. 6. Results of simulation corresponding to 769.79759 nm wavelength. (a) Differential transmittance corresponding to different tangent altitudes obtained by simulation; (b) relative error of differential absorption coefficient by inversion at different tangent altitudes
    Absolute error of inversion temperature at different conditions. (a) Without inversion error of pressure and differential absorption coefficient; (b) with only inversion error of pressure; (c) with only inversion error of differential absorption coefficient; (d) with both inversion error of pressure and differential absorption coefficient
    Fig. 7. Absolute error of inversion temperature at different conditions. (a) Without inversion error of pressure and differential absorption coefficient; (b) with only inversion error of pressure; (c) with only inversion error of differential absorption coefficient; (d) with both inversion error of pressure and differential absorption coefficient
    Temperature and pressure inversion results without differential absorption coefficient inversion error. (a) Temperature inversion results; (b) pressure inversion results of cycle 1
    Fig. 8. Temperature and pressure inversion results without differential absorption coefficient inversion error. (a) Temperature inversion results; (b) pressure inversion results of cycle 1
    Li Hu, Wang Jianyu, Hong Guanglie, Wang Yinan. Simulation Analysis of Inversion Method of Atmospheric Temperature and Pressure for Laser Occultation[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(3): 3010021
    Download Citation