Author Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Precision Opto-mechatronics Technology, Ministry of Education, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Video extensometer principle based on 2D vision measurement.
Fig. 2. Process diagram of sub-planes: (a) calibration target with 6×22 point fixed to coincide with the specimen surface, (b) extract and save sub-pixel coordinates of every reference point from the target image, and (c) establish the mapping model between each image sub-plane and measurement plane.
Fig. 3. Schematic of coordinate location method in sub-plane.
Fig. 4. Effects of the lens distortion: (a) real chessboard image and image with lens distortion and (b) pixel deviations before and after image distortion.
Fig. 5. Relationship between sub-planes interval and mapping accuracy, obtained using lens with first distortion coefficient k1=4.1×10−8: (a) fixed interval deviation distribution in whole view range 400 mm×400 mm and (b) relationship between maximum deviation and sub-planes interval.
Fig. 6. Principle of the out-plane effects.
Fig. 7. Process of measurement experiment: (a) calibration target fixed on stretching machine, (b) image for calibration, (c) matrix of circular center, (d) displacement measurement using two methods, (e) 81 pixels × 81 pixels correlation subset, and (f) gauge length measurement.
Fig. 8. Comparative results for calibration accuracy using the two methods.
Calibration Accuracy | Number | Maximum (μm) | Minimum (μm) | Average (μm) | Maximum (%) | Minimum (%) |
---|
Local Sub-Plane | X | 136 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.32 | 0.00 | Mapping Method | Y | 136 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.00 | Geometric Similarity | X | 136 | 28.08 | 0.12 | 12.22 | 4.68 | 0.02 | Method | Y | 136 | 27.62 | 0.15 | 13.07 | 4.60 | 0.03 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of Calibration Accuracy
Displacement Measurement/μm | Data Comparison |
---|
Proposed Method | 103 | 217 | 354 | 496 | 615 | 749 | 905 | 1103 | DIC Method | 102 | 217 | 359 | 501 | 616 | 750 | 909 | 1104 | Real Data | 103.7 | 218.2 | 356.1 | 497.8 | 614.3 | 747.7 | 907.1 | 1101.5 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of Displacement Measurement Accuracy
Gauge Length Measurement/μm | Data Comparison |
---|
Proposed Method | 5998 | 11995 | 18008 | 24014 | 35991 | 59,984 | 84,017 | Real Data | 6000 | 12000 | 18000 | 24000 | 36000 | 60,000 | 84,000 |
|
Table 3. Comparison of Gauge Length Measurement Accuracy