• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 1, 0128002 (2019)
Luoru Li*, Xin Xu*, Hao Dong, Rong Gui, and Xinfang Xie
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.0128002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Luoru Li, Xin Xu, Hao Dong, Rong Gui, Xinfang Xie. Gaussian Mixture Model and Classification of Polarimetric Features for SAR Images[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 0128002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Polarimetric SAR images from Radarsat-2 in San Francisco. (a) Pauli pseudo color image; (b) corresponding map; (c) ground truth
    Fig. 1. Polarimetric SAR images from Radarsat-2 in San Francisco. (a) Pauli pseudo color image; (b) corresponding map; (c) ground truth
    Polarimetric SAR images from Radarsat-2 in Flevoland. (a) Pauli pseudo color image; (b) corresponding map; (c) ground truth
    Fig. 2. Polarimetric SAR images from Radarsat-2 in Flevoland. (a) Pauli pseudo color image; (b) corresponding map; (c) ground truth
    Polarimetric SAR images from Radarsat-2 in Vancouver. (a) Pauli pseudo color image; (b) corresponding map; (c) ground truth
    Fig. 3. Polarimetric SAR images from Radarsat-2 in Vancouver. (a) Pauli pseudo color image; (b) corresponding map; (c) ground truth
    Fitting results of each feature at different distributions. (a) Water; (b) forest; (c) farmland; (d) urban
    Fig. 4. Fitting results of each feature at different distributions. (a) Water; (b) forest; (c) farmland; (d) urban
    Flow chart of constrained distance estimation algorithm
    Fig. 5. Flow chart of constrained distance estimation algorithm
    Distance function at different parameters
    Fig. 6. Distance function at different parameters
    Fitting results at different parameters. (a) k=1; (b) k=5; (c) k=8
    Fig. 7. Fitting results at different parameters. (a) k=1; (b) k=5; (c) k=8
    Flow chart of polarimetric SAR image classification algorithm based on GMM model
    Fig. 8. Flow chart of polarimetric SAR image classification algorithm based on GMM model
    Polarimetric SAR classification results in San Francisco. (a) KNN; (b) SVM; (c) RF; (d) WHRT; (e) GMM
    Fig. 9. Polarimetric SAR classification results in San Francisco. (a) KNN; (b) SVM; (c) RF; (d) WHRT; (e) GMM
    Polarimetric SAR classification results in Flevoland. (a) KNN; (b) SVM; (c) RF; (d) WHRT; (e) GMM
    Fig. 10. Polarimetric SAR classification results in Flevoland. (a) KNN; (b) SVM; (c) RF; (d) WHRT; (e) GMM
    Polarimetric SAR classification results in Vancouver. (a) KNN; (b) SVM; (c) RF; (d) WHRT; (e) GMM
    Fig. 11. Polarimetric SAR classification results in Vancouver. (a) KNN; (b) SVM; (c) RF; (d) WHRT; (e) GMM
    Overall accuracy vs. number of training samples
    Fig. 12. Overall accuracy vs. number of training samples
    DistributionWaterForestFarmlandUrban
    Gamma1.4140.6910.4361.221
    Log-normal1.2770.7960.4001.115
    K1.7641.1340.7841.515
    GMM0.2450.2570.2830.175
    Table 1. KS distance mean at different distributions
    DistributionWaterForestFarmlandUrban
    Gamma2.5440.9410.5372.087
    Log-normal2.2331.3870.5061.890
    K3.1351.4190.8822.551
    GMM0.3050.3220.4010.250
    Table 2. Maximum KS distance at different distributions
    PlaceAlgorithmWaterForestFarmlandUrbanOverallKappa
    San FranciscoKNN99.8298.28-69.1794.3491.16
    SVM99.6896.70-78.2695.0391.61
    RF99.7898.24-79.7395.9792.76
    WHRT99.4295.44-73.0193.0189.24
    GMM99.5098.98-95.8496.9093.23
    FlevolandKNN86.7791.1075.2974.9183.8576.23
    SVM82.4790.4272.8875.2982.7175.15
    RF85.9886.0373.6975.8883.0176.60
    WHRT85.6086.9672.0572.1980.8972.37
    GMM87.6985.8192.7088.1989.7082.11
    VancouverKNN99.2887.1573.8848.1981.0266.77
    SVM99.1884.7263.2066.1080.5765.45
    RF99.2886.8679.5672.5284.1669.35
    WHRT99.2188.7266.4986.2180.2166.22
    GMM99.6686.8880.0896.7189.9774.22
    Table 3. Experimental accuracy in classification of polarimetric SAR%
    Feature setsAlgorithmWaterForestFarmlandUrbanOverallKappa
    Cloude-PottierdecompositionKNN82.7395.5474.5915.5969.8761.74
    SVM77.4092.2379.8315.6769.7361.63
    RF84.0794.8783.0433.8477.7968.75
    GMM88.0076.4882.6782.4279.8670.58
    FreemandecompositionKNN92.5690.3987.5137.4178.8770.70
    SVM70.2089.5177.1334.2475.3869.22
    RF93.0186.0688.8851.1581.0071.58
    GMM94.5367.5789.7785.0382.3572.78
    YamaguchidecompositionKNN86.6189.0569.7670.4380.0970.78
    SVM89.3188.3167.7865.6075.8968.65
    RF86.3887.6877.0372.0080.6971.31
    GMM87.5884.5070.7192.9582.2372.61
    Table 4. Experimental accuracy in classification of polarimetric SAR under different features in Flevoland%
    Luoru Li, Xin Xu, Hao Dong, Rong Gui, Xinfang Xie. Gaussian Mixture Model and Classification of Polarimetric Features for SAR Images[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 0128002
    Download Citation