• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 2, 0228003 (2021)
Yani Wang and Xili Wang*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Computer Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710119, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0228003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yani Wang, Xili Wang. Remote Sensing Image Target Detection Model Based on Attention and Feature Fusion[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(2): 0228003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure of the AFFSSD model
    Fig. 1. Structure of the AFFSSD model
    Test results of different models of aircraft. (a) SSD model; (b) AFFSSD model
    Fig. 2. Test results of different models of aircraft. (a) SSD model; (b) AFFSSD model
    Test results of different models of vehicle. (a) SSD model; (b) AFFSSD model
    Fig. 3. Test results of different models of vehicle. (a) SSD model; (b) AFFSSD model
    Partial test results of the two models. (a) SSD model; (b) AFFSSD model
    Fig. 4. Partial test results of the two models. (a) SSD model; (b) AFFSSD model
    BranchLayer nameOutput sizeOperation of convolution
    Detection branchconv4_364×64×5123×3×1024
    fc632×32×10241×1×1024
    fc732×32×10241×1×2563×3×512
    conv8_216×16×5121×1×1283×3×256
    conv9_28×8×2561×1×1283×3×256
    conv10_24×4×2561×1×1283×3×256
    conv11_22×2×2561×1×1283×3×2563×3×256
    conv12_21×1×256--
    Attention branchatt_conv48×8×2561×1×1283×3×2
    att_conv58×8×2--
    Table 1. Specific parameter of the AFFSSD model
    Scale /pixelScale1 (<100)Scale2 (100--200)Scale3 (200--300)Scale4 (>300)Total
    Number(vehicle)370419869674577114
    Number(aircraft)10281438259323697482
    Table 2. Vehicle dimension in the UCAS-AOD data set
    MethodAP of plane /%AP of small-vehicle /%mAP /%S /s
    SSD88.1385.0986.610.36
    Ref.[17]90.6688.1789.410.34
    AFFSSD93.7091.3492.520.26
    Table 3. Detection results of different methods in UCAS-AOD data set
    MethodSSDAFFSSD
    AP of scale1/%57.1162.07
    AP of scale2/%64.0970.31
    AP of scale3/%69.0272.65
    AP of scale4/%69.7171.33
    S /s38.9038.10
    Table 4. Detection results of the two models on different scale targets
    ModelRICNN[18]SSDDSSD[19]Ref.[20]Deformable R-FCN[21]Faster R-CNN[22]AFFSSD
    Aircraft88.3584.3286.5095.2087.3094.6087.02
    Ship77.3462.9065.4079.7081.4082.3083.50
    Oil tank85.2778.2590.3073.7063.6065.3280.69
    Baseball diamond88.1289.3389.6096.4090.4095.5096.02
    Tennis court40.8379.4185.1071.6081.6081.9080.32
    Basketball court58.4587.6980.4072.1074.1089.7090.10
    Ground track field86.7380.6178.2099.7090.3092.4081.36
    Harbor68.6071.3770.5073.2075.3072.4075.80
    Bridge61.5165.3568.2057.0071.4057.5072.03
    Vehicle71.1062.3074.2072.0075.5077.8078.01
    mAP72.6376.1578.8479.0679.0980.9482.49
    Table 5. Detection results of different models in the NWPU VHR-10 data set unit: %
    Yani Wang, Xili Wang. Remote Sensing Image Target Detection Model Based on Attention and Feature Fusion[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(2): 0228003
    Download Citation