• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 55, Issue 5, 051101 (2018)
Xiaolong Wang1、2、1; 2; , Feng Wang1、2、1; 2; , Xiao Liu1、2、1; 2; , Yujian Cao1、1; , and Jintao Yu1、1;
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Army Artillery and Air Defense Academy, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
  • 2 Key Laboratory of Polarization Imaging Detection Technology in Anhui Province, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP55.051101 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiaolong Wang, Feng Wang, Xiao Liu, Yujian Cao, Jintao Yu. Hyperspectral Polarization Characteristics of Typical Camouflage Target Under Desert Background[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(5): 051101 Copy Citation Text show less
    Model of reflected light polarization characteristics
    Fig. 1. Model of reflected light polarization characteristics
    Imaging system of divided aperture simultaneous type hypersepctral polarization. (a) Physical map; (b) position of main filed of view
    Fig. 2. Imaging system of divided aperture simultaneous type hypersepctral polarization. (a) Physical map; (b) position of main filed of view
    Design diagram of divided aperture simultaneous type hyperspectral polarization imaging system
    Fig. 3. Design diagram of divided aperture simultaneous type hyperspectral polarization imaging system
    Experiment samples. (a) Desert camouflage net; (b) desert camouflage board; (c) shrinkage ratio target of tank; (d) shrinkage ratio target of Hummer
    Fig. 4. Experiment samples. (a) Desert camouflage net; (b) desert camouflage board; (c) shrinkage ratio target of tank; (d) shrinkage ratio target of Hummer
    Experimental design diagram
    Fig. 5. Experimental design diagram
    Flow chart of experimental data processing
    Fig. 6. Flow chart of experimental data processing
    Relative reflectance spectra of desert camouflage net under different illuminations. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Fig. 7. Relative reflectance spectra of desert camouflage net under different illuminations. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Relative reflectance spectra of desert camouflage board under different illuminations. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Fig. 8. Relative reflectance spectra of desert camouflage board under different illuminations. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Relative reflectance spectra of shrinkage ratio target of tank under different illuminations. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Fig. 9. Relative reflectance spectra of shrinkage ratio target of tank under different illuminations. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Relative reflectance spectra of shrinkage ratio target of Hummer under different illuminations. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Fig. 10. Relative reflectance spectra of shrinkage ratio target of Hummer under different illuminations. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Relative reflectance spectra of desert camouflage net under different observation angles. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Fig. 11. Relative reflectance spectra of desert camouflage net under different observation angles. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Relative reflectance spectra of desert camouflage board under different observation angles. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Fig. 12. Relative reflectance spectra of desert camouflage board under different observation angles. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Relative reflectance spectra of shrinkage ratio target of tank under different observation angles. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Fig. 13. Relative reflectance spectra of shrinkage ratio target of tank under different observation angles. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Relative reflectance spectra of shrinkage ratio target of Hummer under different observation angles. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Fig. 14. Relative reflectance spectra of shrinkage ratio target of Hummer under different observation angles. (a) Relative reflectance spectra of synthetic intensity; (b) relative reflectance spectra of polarization degree
    Serial numberParameterParameter value or property
    1Spectral range /nm450-950
    2Spectral resolution /nm2-8
    3Field angle /(°)6
    4Polarization direction /(°)0,60,120
    5Quantized value /bit12
    6Frame frequency /(frame·s-1)Maximum 20
    7Detection range /kmSuperior to 1 (fine weather)
    8Process modeFusion process spectral and polarization
    9Imaging power /W35.6
    10Standby power /W6
    11Spectral switch elapsed time /ms0.1
    12Focal length /mm78
    13Clear aperture /mm×mm8×8
    14Optical probe size /mm×mm×mm260×220×240
    15Linear polarization range /nm350-2300
    Table 1. Main performance indexes of divided aperture simultaneous type hyperspectral polarization imaging system
    Xiaolong Wang, Feng Wang, Xiao Liu, Yujian Cao, Jintao Yu. Hyperspectral Polarization Characteristics of Typical Camouflage Target Under Desert Background[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(5): 051101
    Download Citation