• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 41, Issue 9, 0911002 (2021)
Jingwei Song1、2、3, Changwei Li1、2、3、*, and Sijiong Zhang1、2、3
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Astronomical Observatories, Nanjing Institute of Astronomical Optics & Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042, China;
  • 2Key Laboratory of Astronomical Optics & Technology (Nanjing Institute of Astronomical Optics & Technology), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042, China;
  • 3School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202141.0911002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jingwei Song, Changwei Li, Sijiong Zhang. Quantitative Phase Imaging Based on Defocused Shack-Hartmann Sensor[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(9): 0911002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of defocused Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Fig. 1. Schematic of defocused Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Diagram of experimental setup for quantative phase imaging
    Fig. 2. Diagram of experimental setup for quantative phase imaging
    Phase retrieval flowchart
    Fig. 3. Phase retrieval flowchart
    Optical path difference of microlens array. (a) Result of phase imaging; (b) difference between theoretical value and phase imaging result
    Fig. 4. Optical path difference of microlens array. (a) Result of phase imaging; (b) difference between theoretical value and phase imaging result
    Phase imaging results of phase screen. (a) Input optical path difference; (b) optical path difference of phase imaging; (c) residual error
    Fig. 5. Phase imaging results of phase screen. (a) Input optical path difference; (b) optical path difference of phase imaging; (c) residual error
    Curve of evaluation function
    Fig. 6. Curve of evaluation function
    Phase imaging results of phase objects. (a) Optical path difference caused by object; (b) optical path difference obtained by phase imaging; (c) residual error
    Fig. 7. Phase imaging results of phase objects. (a) Optical path difference caused by object; (b) optical path difference obtained by phase imaging; (c) residual error
    Curve of evaluation function
    Fig. 8. Curve of evaluation function
    Phase imaging results of grating. (a) Input optical path difference; (b) optical path difference of phase imaging; (c) residual error
    Fig. 9. Phase imaging results of grating. (a) Input optical path difference; (b) optical path difference of phase imaging; (c) residual error
    Curve of evaluation function
    Fig. 10. Curve of evaluation function
    Evaluation function curves. (a) C1 and C2; (b) C3 and C4
    Fig. 11. Evaluation function curves. (a) C1 and C2; (b) C3 and C4
    Optical path difference and residual error of phase object imaging under different SNR. (a) 20 dB; (b) 30 dB; (c) 40 dB
    Fig. 12. Optical path difference and residual error of phase object imaging under different SNR. (a) 20 dB; (b) 30 dB; (c) 40 dB
    SNR /dBError /μm
    203.320×10-2
    302.800×10-3
    403.000×10-4
    Table 1. Error of phase imaging under different SNR
    Jingwei Song, Changwei Li, Sijiong Zhang. Quantitative Phase Imaging Based on Defocused Shack-Hartmann Sensor[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(9): 0911002
    Download Citation