• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 60, Issue 14, 1415005 (2023)
Xiaopin Zhong1, Junwei Zhu1, Zhihao Lie1, and Yuanlong Deng2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Mechatronics and Control Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 510086, Guangdong, China
  • 2Shenzhen Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518116, Guangdong, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP222111 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiaopin Zhong, Junwei Zhu, Zhihao Lie, Yuanlong Deng. Anomaly Detection Method of Polarizer Appearance Based on Synthetic Defects[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(14): 1415005 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of polarizer imaging experiment system
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of polarizer imaging experiment system
    Structured light imaging enhancement effect (left, uniform light; right, structured light)
    Fig. 2. Structured light imaging enhancement effect (left, uniform light; right, structured light)
    Overall framework of proposed model
    Fig. 3. Overall framework of proposed model
    Anti anomaly detection network model based on encoding and decoding structure
    Fig. 4. Anti anomaly detection network model based on encoding and decoding structure
    Anomaly detection process based on synthetic defects
    Fig. 5. Anomaly detection process based on synthetic defects
    Real defect examples. (a) Point defect; (b) foreign matter; (c) bubbles; (d) crease
    Fig. 6. Real defect examples. (a) Point defect; (b) foreign matter; (c) bubbles; (d) crease
    Examples of composite defects
    Fig. 7. Examples of composite defects
    Hyperparametric selection diagram of model loss weight
    Fig. 8. Hyperparametric selection diagram of model loss weight
    Relationship between number of training samples and model accuracy
    Fig. 9. Relationship between number of training samples and model accuracy
    Comparison of reconstruction results of some normal samples
    Fig. 10. Comparison of reconstruction results of some normal samples
    Comparison of reconstruction effect of defect samples
    Fig. 11. Comparison of reconstruction effect of defect samples
    Abnormal score graph of 100 normal samples and 100 defective samples
    Fig. 12. Abnormal score graph of 100 normal samples and 100 defective samples
    Precision-recall curve of various methods
    Fig. 13. Precision-recall curve of various methods
    Interference dataset images
    Fig. 14. Interference dataset images
    Frequency(fringe spacing)Width ratio of black and white stripesBrightnessSaturationRotationEdge distortionNoise impact
    1/2π-1/π0.2-550-2000-0.90-π0.1-5Gaussian exponent
    Table 1. Normal samples under different characteristics
    MethodAUCAverage time of single image detection /ms
    AnoGAN0.7187320
    VQ-VAE260.88325.1
    GANomaly0.79252.2
    Skip-GANomaly0.68637.4
    Skip-GANomaly(+proposed Llat0.73439.8
    Proposed method without proposed Llat0.91619.4
    Proposed method0.97919.2
    Table 2. Effect comparison of different methods
    MethodAUC of original test dataAUC of interference dataDecrease /%
    AnoGAN0.7180.62712.7
    VQ-VAE0.8830.74615.5
    GANomaly0.7920.65816.9
    Skip-GANomaly0.6860.4534.4
    Skip-GANomaly(+proposed Llat0.7340.64112.7
    Proposed method without proposed Llat0.9160.81810.7
    Proposed method0.9790.9334.7
    Table 3. AUC difference between different methods and original data under interference data
    Xiaopin Zhong, Junwei Zhu, Zhihao Lie, Yuanlong Deng. Anomaly Detection Method of Polarizer Appearance Based on Synthetic Defects[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(14): 1415005
    Download Citation