• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 48, Issue 12, 1204001 (2021)
Shaorong Xiao1、2、3、*, Bohan Liu1、2, Liufeng Shi3, and Biao Huang3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Laser & Infrared System (Shandong University), Ministry of Education, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China;
  • 2Center for Optics Research and Engineering (CORE), Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China
  • 3School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210044, China;
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202148.1204001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Shaorong Xiao, Bohan Liu, Liufeng Shi, Biao Huang. Influence of Scale Effect of Photodetector on Visibility Measurement Uncertainty[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(12): 1204001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Optical principle of transmission visibility meter
    Fig. 1. Optical principle of transmission visibility meter
    Experimental device for performance test of photodiodes
    Fig. 2. Experimental device for performance test of photodiodes
    Relationship between effective value of output voltage of two kinds of photodetectors and displacement relative to detector center
    Fig. 3. Relationship between effective value of output voltage of two kinds of photodetectors and displacement relative to detector center
    Relationship between responsivity of two kinds of photodetectors and displacement relative to center
    Fig. 4. Relationship between responsivity of two kinds of photodetectors and displacement relative to center
    Relationship between the relative deviation of the responsivity of the two photodetectors with respect to the center responsivity and displacement relative to center
    Fig. 5. Relationship between the relative deviation of the responsivity of the two photodetectors with respect to the center responsivity and displacement relative to center
    Relationship between relative deviation of output voltage of two photodetectors with respect to effective value of central output voltage and displacement
    Fig. 6. Relationship between relative deviation of output voltage of two photodetectors with respect to effective value of central output voltage and displacement
    Distance fromthe center ofthe light spot/mmOutputvoltage/VVoltagerelativedeviation/%Relative deviation of visibility(@V=2 km,L=70 m,β=1.596×10-3 m-1) /%Relative deviation of visibility(@V=2 km,L=30 m,β=1.596×10-3 m-1) /%Relative deviation of visibility (@V=10 km,L=70 m,β=3.912×10-4 m-1) /%Relative deviation of visibility(@V=10 km,L=30 m,β=3.912×10-4 m-1) /%
    02.9880
    0.102.98780.0070.060.150.260.60
    0.202.98740.0210.180.430.751.76
    0.302.98680.0410.370.851.493.48
    0.402.98600.0680.611.412.475.77
    0.502.98500.1010.912.113.708.63
    0.602.98380.1411.272.955.1612.05
    0.702.98240.1881.683.936.8716.03
    0.802.98080.2412.165.048.8220.58
    0.902.97900.3022.706.3011.0125.69
    1.002.97700.3683.307.6913.4431.37
    1.102.97480.4413.959.2216.1237.61
    1.202.97240.5214.6710.8919.0444.42
    1.302.96980.6085.4412.6922.2051.79
    1.402.96710.7016.2714.6425.6059.73
    1.502.96410.8017.1716.7229.2468.23
    1.602.96090.9078.1218.9533.1377.29
    1.702.95751.0209.1321.3137.2586.92
    1.802.95391.14010.2023.8041.6297.12
    1.902.95021.26611.3326.4446.23107.88
    2.002.94621.39912.5229.2251.09119.20
    2.102.94201.53813.7732.1356.18131.09
    2.202.93771.68515.0835.1861.52143.54
    2.302.93311.83716.4538.3767.10156.56
    2.402.92831.99717.8741.7072.92170.14
    2.502.92342.16319.3645.1778.98184.29
    Table 1. Contribution of spot drift on sensitive surface of UV-0**DQ type photodiode to relative uncertainty of visibility measurement
    Distance fromthe center ofthe light spot/mmOutputvoltage/VVoltagerelativedeviation/%Relative deviation of visibility(@V=2 km,L=70 m,β=1.596×10-3 m-1) /%Relative deviation of visibility(@V=2 km,L=30 m,β=1.596×10-3 m-1) /%Relative deviation of visibility (@V=10 km,L=70 m,β=3.912×10-4 m-1) /%Relative deviation of visibility(@V=10 km,L=30 m,β=3.912×10-4 m-1) /%
    02.4270
    0.102.42660.0160.140.330.591.37
    0.202.42570.0540.491.131.984.62
    0.302.42420.1151.032.394.189.76
    0.402.42220.1971.764.127.2016.80
    0.502.41970.3022.706.3011.0225.72
    0.602.41660.4293.848.9515.6536.53
    0.702.41300.5785.1712.0721.1049.23
    0.802.40880.7496.7015.6427.3563.81
    0.902.40410.9428.4319.6834.4180.29
    1.002.39891.15810.3624.1842.2898.65
    1.102.39311.39612.4929.1550.96118.91
    1.202.38681.65514.8234.5760.45141.05
    1.302.38001.93717.3440.4670.75165.08
    1.402.37262.24220.0646.8281.86191.00
    1.502.36472.56822.9953.6393.78218.81
    1.602.35622.91726.1160.91106.50248.51
    1.702.34723.28729.4268.66120.04280.10
    1.802.33773.68032.9476.86134.39313.57
    1.902.32764.09536.6685.53149.54348.94
    2.002.31704.53240.5794.66165.51386.19
    2.102.30594.99244.68104.25182.29425.33
    2.202.29425.47348.99114.31199.87466.36
    2.302.28195.97753.50124.83218.26509.28
    2.402.26926.50358.21135.82237.47554.09
    2.502.25597.05163.11147.26257.48600.79
    Table 2. Contribution of spot drift on sensitive surface of 2CU** type photodiode to relative uncertainty of visibility measurement
    Shaorong Xiao, Bohan Liu, Liufeng Shi, Biao Huang. Influence of Scale Effect of Photodetector on Visibility Measurement Uncertainty[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(12): 1204001
    Download Citation