• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 16, 1610004 (2021)
Xiangsheng Zhang* and Qing Shen
Author Affiliations
  • School of Internet of Things Engineering, Key Laboratory of Advanced Control of Light Industry Process, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1610004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiangsheng Zhang, Qing Shen. Multitarget Tracking Algorithm Based on an Improved YOLOv3 Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(16): 1610004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure of standard convolution filters
    Fig. 1. Structure of standard convolution filters
    Structure of depthwise convolution filters
    Fig. 2. Structure of depthwise convolution filters
    Structure of pointwise convolution filters
    Fig. 3. Structure of pointwise convolution filters
    SENet structure
    Fig. 4. SENet structure
    Improved YOLOv3 network model structure diagram
    Fig. 5. Improved YOLOv3 network model structure diagram
    Multi-target tracking algorithm flow
    Fig. 6. Multi-target tracking algorithm flow
    Intersection-over-union of different number of anchors
    Fig. 7. Intersection-over-union of different number of anchors
    Comparison of algorithm tracking results based on MOT15-PETS09 sequence. (a) YOLOv3-Deep-SORT tracking results; (b) our algorithm tracking results
    Fig. 8. Comparison of algorithm tracking results based on MOT15-PETS09 sequence. (a) YOLOv3-Deep-SORT tracking results; (b) our algorithm tracking results
    Comparison of algorithm tracking results based on MOT16-06 sequence. (a) YOLOv3-Deep-SORT tracking results; (b) our algorithm tracking results
    Fig. 9. Comparison of algorithm tracking results based on MOT16-06 sequence. (a) YOLOv3-Deep-SORT tracking results; (b) our algorithm tracking results
    Comparison of algorithm tracking results based on ETHZ-eth02 sequence. (a) YOLOv3-Deep-SORT tracking results; (b) our algorithm tracking results
    Fig. 10. Comparison of algorithm tracking results based on ETHZ-eth02 sequence. (a) YOLOv3-Deep-SORT tracking results; (b) our algorithm tracking results
    k=7k=8k=9k=10k=11
    (18,69)(17,70)(16,69)(18,40)(18,72)
    (26,82)(23,62)(18,40)(18,75)(20,40)
    (28,64)(25,81)(20,80)(23,64)(23,80)
    (33,96)(31,72)(23,64)(25,83)(26,64)
    (34,74)(33,92)(26,82)(31,73)(28,80)
    (41,85)(38,77)(31,72)(33,99)(34,89)
    (49,113)(43,94)(33,94)(37,86)(34,72)
    (52,122)(39,79)(38,74)(36,105)
    (46,107)(46,101)(38,85)
    (62,132)(44,83)
    (51,114)
    Table 1. Size of a priori boxes with different numbers of a priori boxes
    Detection algorithmAvgmisrate /%F1 /%FPS
    Faster RCNN32.1588.575.52
    YOLOv327.8095.4115.65
    Our algorithm13.6096.5622.35
    Table 2. Target detection algorithm performance comparison results
    SequenceAMOT /% ↑PMOT /% ↑sIDFN↓
    Venice-155.177.6411212
    KITTI-1930.269.4911626
    KITTI-1640.871.933619
    ETH-Crossing66.380.415252
    PETS09-S2L255.673.11772938
    TUD-Crossing76.872.821202
    Table 3. Comparison of the indicators of the test set on different sequences
    AlgorithmAMOT /% ↑PMOT /% ↑sIDFPS↑
    YOLOv3-SORT46.861.9102
    Faster RCNN-Deep-SORT35.356.572
    YOLOv3-Deep-SORT54.868.0682.8
    YOLOv3-Kalman[14]39.266.2107
    SiamCNN[15]45.370.4105
    MOTDT[22]57.375.370
    MDP[23]46.471.393
    Our algorithm56.078.2574.4
    Table 4. Comparison of evaluation indexes of multi-target tracking algorithms
    Xiangsheng Zhang, Qing Shen. Multitarget Tracking Algorithm Based on an Improved YOLOv3 Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(16): 1610004
    Download Citation